Elon just gave back $200 billion. We all now have $200 billion according to 🧠🪱 dipshits who conflate wealth and capital. We can now fix world hunger and save all the children
El titular de EC se puede resumir en lo siguiente:
- “Los abogados” mutualistas han aportado tradicionalmente muy poco a su plan de jubilación (la mutualidad)
- “Los abogados” se han dado cuenta de que, a aportaciones bajas, las pensiones de la mutualidad son bajas (algunos lo sabíamos desde que entramos en la mutualidad, pero seguramente porque estudiamos algún módulo en finanzas).
- “Los abogados” quieren que el Estado les garantice una pensión mínima, por encima de lo que hubieran recibido de haber cotizado cantidades equivalentes al RETA (sistema al que podían haberse afiliado libremente desde 1996).
- Las pensiones son el mayor agujero a las cuentas públicas, con un déficit estructural de €60.000-€70.000 al año (y subiendo), que se cubre con otros impuestos y deuda (= impuestos futuros)
- Los políticos (o politicastros) no se atreven a enfrentarse a colectivos organizados que representan decenas de miles de votos y pueden decir unas futuras elecciones (abogados, jubilados…).
- A los políticos (o politicastros) les importa un bledo la sostenibilidad del sistema o el futuro del país (como le importaría a un estadista).
- Salvo que España se convierta en un hub tecnológico y la productividad por hora se dispare hasta la estratosfera, los jóvenes no van a tener un trato parecido (ni de broma), a pesar de que sus salarios son esquilmados a base de cotizaciones para pagar pensiones actuales
- Los jóvenes deberían estar quemando las calles o emigrando (en función de su nivel cabreo), porque el único intetés que tienen los políticos españoles es que engrosen la masa de cotizantes y pagadores de impuestos para seguir con la ficción de que el sistema es sostenible.
Assume the movie had flopped and the director lost his entire $750,000 investment. How many crew members would have voluntarily returned their fees to help offset his loss?
This is the fundamental asymmetry in risk and reward. When someone puts up their own capital and shoulders the real financial risk especially in a high-failure industry like entertainment they alone bear the downside.
Yet the moment the project succeeds, suddenly everyone who was paid upfront wants a bigger piece of the pie. The same people who would not have shared in the loss now feel entitled to share disproportionately in the upside.
If you accept payment for your work regardless of outcome, you’ve already been compensated for your risk (or lack thereof). Why should the person who risked everything not be allowed to reap the rewards when their gamble pays off?
Oh yes, I remember that Bond film where the villain decarbonized the auto industry, brought fast internet to everyone on the planet, and helped paralyzed people interact with the world again.
Dear Microsoft, when I hit the Windows Start menu key and start typing a word to autocomplete a search, I never, ever, EVER want it to return results of something not on my computer. Ever. Like, ever, ever, never.
History's first trillionaire is a guy who catches rockets out of the sky with chopsticks and beams internet to every dead zone on the planet.
Same guy ships cars that drive themselves, humanoid robots for the factory floor, brain chips that let paralyzed people move a cursor with pure thought, and an AI running on a supercomputer his team stood up in months instead of years.
And the people crashing out about his net worth are doing it on the app he owns. The same app governments spent years trying to censor.
You cannot legislate a rocket into orbit.
Voyager 1 is 24 billion kilometers from Earth.
It communicates with us using a 23-watt transmitter.
Less than a refrigerator light bulb.
The signal takes 22 hours to reach us, traveling at the speed of light.
By the time it arrives, it's 20 billion times weaker than the power of a digital watch battery.
NASA's Deep Space Network picks it up using 70-meter dish antennas cooled to near absolute zero to reduce electronic noise.
The engineering required to hear a 23-watt signal from 24 billion km away is arguably more impressive than the spacecraft itself.
Launched 1977.
Still transmitting.
Still being heard.
We built something that works perfectly, 47 years later, in conditions no one has ever tested in.
That's what engineering for the long term looks like.
Creer que "redistribuir la riqueza" acabará la pobreza, es como creer que promediar la nota del salón, acabará con la ignorancia del que no estudia. Esto solo es invento del socialismo.
Hot take: machine learning and AI did more to understand the nature of knowledge, and our relation to reality than 20 centuries of philosophy.
I am ready to kind of defend this hill.