Disappoints who exactly?
Should be titled “Dave Chappelle doesn’t think and say the things that I want him to and that bothers me and those who shape the ideological slant of the news agency I work for”
@reksmore @CEEG_Official @Motionii I agree, it isn't a good look by any stretch of the imagination. But it's a little more complicated than you and I deciding what we deem to be right and wrong. And to mitigate that, we can go off of what has been predetermined to be "right and wrong" by the rules set in place.
@reksmore @CEEG_Official @Motionii I agree... but if there is a call for motion to face consequences, then those consequences should be justified by proof of breaking TOS. Not because someone found his actions or the actions of his team distasteful
@CEEG_Official @reksmore@Motionii I'm also not in disagreement with you here but rules are rules. I don't think any were broken but if they were then I think Reksmore has a point. If no rules were broken then I would suggest turning off in game voice comms...
@CEEG_Official @reksmore@Motionii We can use it, if the TOS was broken then her call for retribution is valid (which I don't believe it is) but if TOS wasn't broken, then it would appear to me as a cry for attention and a classic "woe is me, words hurt me" tale.