I was obviously brought into the gender ideology fight because of women’s rights & women only spaces, but I genuinely believe that this is an issue that impacts everyone. Women’s rights are the canary in the coal mine and should have been listened to 20+ years ago.
Gender ideology attacks human beings at one of our most basic instincts: sex recognition. An evolutionary skill that is so instinctual, we don’t even realize the moment we’re acknowledging biological sex in every interaction we ever have, whether it matters or not. But it’s there.
Everyone should have the right to acknowledge a man is a man, a woman is a woman, a boy is a boy, a girl is a girl, and it’s impossible to change or be neither.
If the state can force you to accept men as women, they can force you to accept anything. Don’t let them.
🚨🚨 This week, @AustralianLabor and the @Greens blocked not one, but TWO bills in the Senate to amend the Sex Discrimination Act, and restore rights and protections for women and girls on the basis of biological sex.
They know their position to allow men claiming to be women in female-only spaces, services and sports is indefensible, so they won't even debate the issue.
What an absolute disgrace.
Thank you to @OneNationAus Senator @PaulineHansonOz and @LiberalAus Senator @SenatorCash for attempting to restore safety, fairness, dignity and sanity to our laws.
📣 Tell @AlboMP enough is enough: https://t.co/R2K4FyE9D0
#FixTheSDA #IStandWithSallGrover #Auspol
@ArianwenTaffen@salltweets@PaulineHansonOz Bigger than the physical and psychological torture and mutilation of innocent and confused young people, and the erasure of women’s hard-won rights???
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
RECKONING CODE
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
THE TWO EXTREMES
AND THE PROFIT
BETWEEN THEM
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
From chemical castration
of homosexuals in
the Alan Turing era
to the surgical and chemical
reconfiguration
of healthy children today.
Both ends
of the spectrum
are wrong.
But only one now denies
biological reality itself
while wrapping the blade
in empathy.
This is not progress.
This is devolution
disguised as compassion
- and the ledger shows
who cashes the cheque.
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
THE BRUTAL DISTINCTION
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
The past wrong:
Recognised sex,
targeted orientation.
Cruel, unscientific,
state-enforced conformity.
The present wrong:
Denies sex as immutable.
Replaces it with feelings,
declarations, and profit-driven
medical intervention
- especially on minors.
Cases like Chloe Cole
- placed on puberty blockers
then testosterone,
followed by double mastectomy
at 15 amid social influence
and comorbidities
- illustrate the shift from suppressing
what bodies do
to rewriting what bodies are.
Both medicalised vulnerability.
Only one pretends
biology is optional.
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
CT10 X AUDIT
The Gender Industry Ledger
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
1. Is it organic
or does it feel staged?
Real dysphoria exists.
The post-2010 explosion
- especially in adolescent females
with comorbidities
- tracks social media,
peer groups,
and affirmative pipelines.
The scale feels manufactured.
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
2. Who is amplifying it
- and why?
Clinics, surgeons, pharma,
private operators (e.g. GenderGP),
captured institutions, and media.
Amplification sustains the pipeline
from distressed child
to lifelong patient.
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
3. Is division being fuelled
through emotional connection?
Yes. 'Affirm or suicide,'
'listen to the child,'
'bigot' labels.
Empathy is weaponised
to shut down scrutiny
while the interventions roll on.
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
4. What’s the next move
in the playbook?
Push earlier access,
expand 'minor' definitions,
fight restrictions in court,
and frame any caution as harm.
More self-ID laws
and medical tourism pipelines.
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
5. What new laws, policies,
or narratives are being proposed?
Self-ID expansion,
conversion therapy bans
that criminalise
exploratory therapy,
insurance mandates
for affirmation,
and redefinition of sex
in law and language.
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
6. What bigger story
is this distracting from?
The profit model.
Vulnerable youth
- including cases like Chloe Cole
- funnelled
into irreversible pathways
while root causes
(mental health, trauma,
social contagion) are ignored.
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
7. What patterns
does this follow?
Classic medical profit cycle:
identify vulnerability
→ medicalise it under compassion
→ recurring revenue
→ smear critics.
Mirrors opioids,
over-prescribed psych drugs,
and past scandals.
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
8. Why now?
Social media contagion +
captured institutions +
massive financial upside
met a post-2010
cultural window.
The money machine
found the perfect market
at the perfect time.
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
9. Who benefits from this?
Pharma (blockers/hormones),
gender clinics, surgeons,
affirming therapists,
private providers,
and the broader
medical-industrial complex.
Not the kids.
Not the de-transitioners.
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
10. How do we
break the cycle of manipulation?
Demand transparent long-term
outcome data.
Therapy-first,
evidence-based caution on minors.
Adult informed consent only.
Follow the money relentlessly.
Refuse the empathy shield
when it protects profit over reality.
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
THE EVOLVING VERDICT
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
Both extremes were wrong.
The past pathologised
orientation while accepting sex.
The present pathologises sex itself
while profiting from its denial.
Greed,
wearing the mask of empathy,
is the through-line.
Without the money -
the clinics, the drugs,
the procedures, the incentives
- this industry withers.
Biology is not bigotry.
Reality is not optional.
Children are not profit centres.
The ledger shows
the human entries:
detransitioners like Chloe Cole
bearing the permanent costs
(lost natural development,
mastectomy scars, fertility
and sexual function risks)
of a compassion-framed industry
that denied immutable sex.
The middle path is simple:
mental health first,
evidence-based caution on minors,
adult informed consent,
and zero denial of immutable sex.
Anything else
is just another ledger entry
in the long con.
For a firsthand account,
watch Chloe Cole’s
“How I Fell
for the Transgender Lie”
https://t.co/i7VGjwJKZn
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
TRUTH ABOVE ALL
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
Attached video -
@ChloeCole
- US Senate Testimony.
Medicalised at 15.
Speaking of the cost
the ledger never shows.
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
“Gender ideology, transgenderism, isn’t true. Every single aspect of it is a lie. In fact, every claim it makes, the exact opposite is true. Men are not women, women are not men, no one is born in the wrong body, sex is not changeable, gender identity isn’t real.”
@srsjeff@Bernard_Lane So sue the dentist / oral surgeon. Sounds like she/he did a really bad & incompetent job. I’ve had mine out but I was in my mid-30s and I am fine.
“The editorial comments that came back [from the ABC] about this piece were that terms like ‘biological reality’ & ‘truth’ were offensive. If that’s the standard we’re applying, I don’t think there’s going to be any pieces published by the ABC critical of gender ideology.”
One of those things that never happens if you open up women's changing rooms to any man who wants to come inside has happened. Again.
https://t.co/B3CoQkqcNF
For the past 3 weeks, I have been trying to get an op-ed published at the ABC. The suspicion has long been that the ABC is ideologically captured but when the editorial director assured Senators during the recent Estimates that ABC does publish diverse views, I said let’s see…
This is so hard to hear. The disgrace this whole disgusting episode brings upon the UK is unspeakable. What punishments are appropriate here? For both the rapists and for those who allowed/ignored the rapes.
🚨 Jasmine Sussex - who is being sued for saying men can’t breastfeed - returns to QCAT TODAY to set a date to appeal the January decision denying her legal team access to medical information about the applicant’s “chestfeeding.”
“A vilification claim will not change the biological reality that only women can breastfeed. It is wrong that innocent babies are being used as props to validate an adult’s gender identity,” writes our Head of Advocacy @stephbastiaan.
➡️ Catch up on the case: https://t.co/KKHxx7WcJL
#IStandWithJasmineSussex #Auspol
Hey Jasmine…
Black pilot here.
I think you missed the plot.
Then again, that’s becoming a pattern.
I graduated from West Point.
I went through Army flight school.
I learned to fly the AH-64 Apache.
I deployed to combat and flew 55 combat missions over Baghdad.
Nobody handed me a cockpit because of my skin color.
Nobody lowered the standards for me.
Nobody looked at me and said, “Let’s check a diversity box.”
That’s what people like you don’t seem to understand.
Suggesting that Black pilots, Black engineers, Black doctors, or Black leaders need special preferences to succeed is not empowering, it’s insulting.
I didn’t want a different standard.
I wanted the same standard.
And when you’re flying into combat, the American people don’t care what race the pilot is.
They care whether the pilot is qualified.
Merit isn’t racist.
Excellence isn’t discriminatory.
And reducing every achievement to skin color says far more about your worldview than it does about mine.