@QiaochuYuan and what about the biggest scientific revolution of the 2200s? not planting seeds of mathematical understanding is unwise if we care about future progress
@47fucb4r8c69323 I think I get what you are saying. In the example, gauging the attitudes of the people closest to the front lines of usage (are they excited/impressed etc.) makes sense and also not something most would do if i had to guess (those probably an edge). Thanks
@47fucb4r8c69323@47fucb4r8c69323 how do you deal with these worries? how do you gauge when a qualitative insight is strong enough to trust and rare enough to provide an edge? like with your LV facial recognition example
@47fucb4r8c69323 to the quantitative minded, i think it is difficult to trust the insight of yourself or another. everyone who skillfully uses quantitative methods has had the experience of a high conviction intuition turning out to be false.
there is also the fear: is your insight "priced in" ?
@JohnnyPalomba1@TheMathFlow its not nonsense, its an intuitive visual way to understand WHY that consequence of leibniz's rule is true. understanding must come before rigor
Printers never work because they are an affront to God. Man was not meant to pull objects from the digital realm into the real world. Icarus is flying too close to the sun.
@ysoh@shakoistsLog too complex, too many degrees of freedom. ML forcefields are here and a major development but it remains extremely difficult and expensive many-body problem. -- theoretical chemist & physicist
The issue with modern politics is that Iβm not allowed to think this is fucking cool without accusations of being right wing
But Iβll take the accusations because this is fucking cool for a MMA weigh in