MikeLee1459

Race truck engineer/builder/driver. Ancient history enthusiast. Astronomy major. Electrician. Welder. Artist. Beat the Legend of Zelda in less than an hour.

[Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok]

This dude pretending to be a girl was just arrested for trying to burn down a Republican Party office in Michigan

According to his bio: s*xually fluid gender fluid autistic bipolar emo goth with he/they/xe/she pronouns.

I’m not kidding.

Trans violence is out of control.

[Nick Freitas @NickJFreitas]

Remember when we said that it was only a matter of time before they started pushing this...well, it's here.

[MikeLee1459 @MikeLee1459]

@jsolomonReports Wow..... I'm so shocked... that the exact thing that we all said was going to happen right from the beginning is happening. Crazy.....

[MikeLee1459 @MikeLee1459]

Your missing it. IF there was ever evidence that the FBI and DOJ had that implicated others in the Epstein deal, and they DIDN'T charge anyone with it, then if that evidence was still around, this administration could have used that and charged them with conspiracy. You think that they would just leave Trump's people all the evidence they needed to implicate them in serious crimes? Of course not. What was left for this administration is just enough to make Trump and his administration look bad.

[MikeLee1459 @MikeLee1459]

No.... your misunderstanding me. I'm not saying it doesn't matter, I'm saying that the last administration was never going to leave evidence for this administration to use to charge them with covering up crimes. Even if there ever WAS evidence, why would they just leave that for Trump's people? It would prove that they were complicit. So if there was any evidence, it's long gone, and the only thing that is left there is whatever the last administration WANTED this administration to have. And what did it do? It resulted in this chaos that we have now. Bondi fell for the trap. That's why Trump is saying pull out now, because it's we'd have to be crazy to think that they were just going to leave us proof that they were complicit in covering up crimes, and whatever it is that is going on right now is exactly what they hoped would happen.

[MikeLee1459 @MikeLee1459]

I think Trump is correct, and even more so than people realize. What this all is, is a fucking TRAP. The previous administrations who had any evidence of serious crimes would have either used it to charge people, OR destroyed it, because the existence of it could be used against them. So, MAGA and Trump are all fired up going into office, publicly talking about how they are going to release the truth.... and then they get there and there's nothing there. Because think about it... if there WAS any evidence of serious crimes by third parties, then that would mean that the Trump administration could charge the people in the previous DOJ for covering up serious crimes. There is no way that they would leave that for Trump's people to use against them. But what they probably WOULD do, is leave just enough to keep the hype going, so that Trump and his administration would look like fools, and people would question them. Trump is the only person who is realizing that this is a trap, that it's being weaponized to divide everyone, and derail the agenda. Bondi fell for it, she over-promised, and everyone got hyped up, all over the idea that the previous administration just LEFT this administration proof that they covered up crimes. It's a DUMB error.

[MikeLee1459 @MikeLee1459]

If the previous administration's DOJs had evidence hidden away that they chose not to use to prosecute serious crimes for against powerful people.... why would they then just leave that evidence for this next administration to find, which would only make that previous administration look corrupt and likely warrant criminal charges? If they had any truly damning evidence against third parties, then that shit is gone, if for no other reason than to make sure Trump's DOJ didn't find it and use that against them.

[MikeLee1459 @MikeLee1459]

What bothered me about this whole thing, was that everyone COMPLETELY missed the implications of it. They all wanted to just call her a hypocrite, say she should get the same fine that she advocated that others get and blah blah..... NO. That was not the important part of that situation. That important part, was that the Speaker of the House, one of the people with the highest security clearances in the country and has direct access to the best intel in the country, and was also in the age group with the highest risk of mortality, didn't actually believe that she was in any danger. And what does that mean? Well, if nothing else, it at least means that she didn't think a mask would change anything, and she didn't think that the threat was even high enough to go without getting her hair done... so not that big of a threat. It means that everything we were told was complete nonsense.

[MikeLee1459 @MikeLee1459]

@Greyinggeek1 @Lukewearechange I would be advocating for the people on social media and the influencers to take break until they actually have something other than speculation to report.

[MikeLee1459 @MikeLee1459]

It's not that I think We should be allowed to kill someone just because they are in our home, the framing on this is all wrong. When someone has BROKEN INTO your home, the only thing that you can be sure of is that their intentions are to cause some kind of harm to you, and you have the right to defend yourself and your property from them.

[MikeLee1459 @MikeLee1459]

@SnkBrs "Look..." -- nothing you just said matters

[MikeLee1459 @MikeLee1459]

I'm of the opinion that all of this drama is being engineered as a means of breaking up the MAGA coalition. People are hysterical like they've been hypnotized, all over something that is based almost purely on years of speculation and rumor. Example, everyone wants some "list", we have never had any confirmation that this guy actually had an actual client list, and even beyond that, you can't charge someone with a crime because they put your name on a list. You can investigate them, but just being on some guy's list isn't a crime. And Trump made a pretty good point in his post too, can we actually trust anything left behind by the previous administration? By Wray, Garland, or even Barr? All I know is that this is getting ridiculous, no one knows what they are talking about, everyone is pointing fingers and nothing good is coming out of this.

[MikeLee1459 @MikeLee1459]

Ok, I REALLY wish that people would understand this.... Even if there was a "list" of names that the DOJ was in possession of that they found while searching Jeffery Epstein's property.... you realize that it's not enough to convict anyone of anything, right? Like, it's not a crime for some guy to write your name down on a list. It might be grounds to open an investigation, but it's not in of itself proof of any wrong doing. If you were a prosecutor, and you brought charges against someone based on nothing more than their name being a list, your case would be thrown out of court, if it ever even got that far. And on top of that, I actually don't even think it's legal for them to just publish something like that. And here's why... if it's not enough to charge them with a crime, then it's just slandering them. And if they are using that as a basis for an investigation into them, then they also aren't going to release that because it would compromise the investigation.

Everyone has gotten into this very strange frenzy, like they've been hypnotized, "we want the damn list!!!", with no evidence that there ever even was a "list", it's just been a trope in social media that people have repeated so many times that it's become "fact" to everyone. And as far as the "files", I'm guessing that you mean statements from witnesses or notes on the investigation into his crimes? What exactly do you mean by the "files"? And again, "files" are not proof of a crime either. Do you all mean that you want to see the EVIDENCE that they collect? Well we'd all like to know where all of that stuff went, but as far as I know, the previous FBI "misplaced" all of it or destroyed it. I'm sure that they've found all kinds of surveillance camera footage from his residences, but I would almost guarantee that there is nothing "damning" on any of it, it's all been taken already.

And now, I actually get what Trump was talking about. I think this subject was intentionally pushed in the way that it was to the public by intentional intelligence operations, specifically to get it to this point. Get everyone into a frenzy based on incorrect information and expectations that they intentionally planted into the collective consciousness, so that it would rip this movement apart.

[MikeLee1459 @MikeLee1459]

@BrightInsight6 I think they've definitely been doing exploratory searching for a way into it, I just doubt that they've figured out a plan yet.

[MikeLee1459 @MikeLee1459]

The concept of communal living works better and better the smaller the group that is involved, and the deeper the relationship between the people. Like a family. A family can live pretty well in a communal fashion. But even then it's a struggle when one person isn't pulling their weight. Now add an extra person who has no relationship to that family and shares few of their values or interests. Now add some lazy people. It very quickly turns into a nightmare situation and we're not even in a triple digit population. The larger it gets, the more difficult it gets to maintain.

[MikeLee1459 @MikeLee1459]

I'm of the opinion that no cases handled by Wray, Brennan, Garland, Barr, etc, can be trusted. None of the material can be verified as real, and so much time has gone by and has traded so many hands that we have no idea what's been taken or added into it. I feel like this entire drama is being pushed along to make the MAGA coalition fall apart, by pushing lots of speculation and rumor into the fold as if it was fact. We actually know very very little about what Epstein was doing, almost everything is based on loose speculation and the testimony of a few people, and it's gone from rumors that he was trafficking teenage girls to his island to give his wealthy friends "massages" (and more) to now "he had tens of thousands of small children on his island and he recorded all the worlds elite having sex with them". That's a big jump, but everyone has just been accepting that jump as fact. I really think that this whole thing is being weaponized against us, and we need to be careful.

[MikeLee1459 @MikeLee1459]

@BreannaMorello Because even if they disagree with their actions, they don't disagree with their motivations or reasoning, they are, in the end, on the same side.

[MikeLee1459 @MikeLee1459]

I'm not in shape. I'm overweight. But I'm working on it. And I know how to lose weight, it's not that hard. EAT FUCKING LESS. Sure, there are ways to make it easier, certain foods that get your body more in "burn fat" mode or whatever, but if you just keep a calorie deficit, you will consistently lose weight. I cut out sugar, and most dairy, and just reduced the overall amount of food I ate, and I'm down around 15 pounds. You can either burn off the calories by being extremely active, or just not consume them in the first place. Some degree of both is ideal.

[MikeLee1459 @MikeLee1459]

I think it's pretty simple, the previous administration already had their hands on it. Same with the Epstein stuff, the JFK stuff, etc. Anytime you have different groups of people with different interests investigating something and being in control of the evidence, it's going to get harder and harder, if not impossible, to actually get to what really happened. Do you trust that everything done under Wray and Garland is going to be above board? That they just did things by the book and didn't remove evidence or cover things up that went against their various narratives? I think we STILL have people within our institutions that would work to that effect, but last year, the entire system was set up that way. So no, I don't think it's weird at all that we've gotten no answers. They knew that these would be things that the new administration would focus on, and they prepared accordingly. I would be very surprised if we got any concrete answers on any of these things. This is why I'm with President Trump on this. We can't really do shit about previous investigations, they are already tainted. What we can do, is focus on things that actually have an impact on CURRENT issues, and there are plenty of things to focus on. We need to be going after Antifa, we need to be digging into corruption within each administration, we need to be digging into Act Blue, securing our voting systems, etc.