Healthy & Awake Podcast

Board Certified Health & Wellness Coach (NBC-HWC) and critical thinker.

[Healthy & Awake Podcast @MikeVeraHealth]

Thanks for the powerful endorsement, @P_McCulloughMD. Honored to stand with you, @joerogan, and @TuckerCarlson in the fight for truth.

I originally planned to drop this episode next Tuesday... but after listening back to the full conversation, I’m moving it up. Full episode drops this Thursday on Healthy & Awake Podcast.

@McCulloughFund

[Healthy & Awake Podcast @MikeVeraHealth]

"The science says" used to be the start of a conversation. Now it ends them. At some point the phrase became a verdict- something you deploy to stop a line of thinking rather than open one. And once that happens, the word is available to anyone with a study that fits their point.

Science, actual science, is the slow accumulation of findings where each one assumes the previous might need revising. Every conclusion is provisional- the whole system is built on the assumption you might be wrong about the last one. The problem is that precision at that level doesn't fit in a headline. When you compress something that rigorous into "the experts agree," you've replaced it with something that sounds similar but runs on completely different rules.

Mother Nature isn't waiting on a paper. She ran the whole experiment first, on a timeline no methodology can truly replicate, and produced results before anyone had words for what she was doing. Science at its best is humans trying to reconstruct what's already operational, one variable at a time. When a single headline takes on that weight, the word starts working the way "natural" does on a food label- it's still there, it just stopped doing what it used to.

What's one area where you've noticed "the science says" being used more like a conversation-stopper than a starting point?

Stay healthy & awake 😎

[Healthy & Awake Podcast @MikeVeraHealth]

Propaganda only works when it doesn't feel like propaganda.

The standard American breakfast didn't emerge from nutrition science or tradition- it came from a campaign Edward Bernays ran in the 1920s for a pork producer. He recruited doctors to endorse a "hearty" breakfast, published their statements without disclosing who was paying, and within a year it was just what Americans ate. He ran the same type of operation to get women smoking and called it "Torches of Freedom."

He called the whole discipline "engineering consent."

The food industry still runs that playbook- funding studies that confirm what they want confirmed while quietly burying the ones that don't, and making sure the numbers that trigger prescriptions become the new normal. Bernays just had a smaller budget.

What stuck with me when I first went deep on this was realizing that influence isn't the problem- it's a tool. The same psychology Bernays used to build dependency, the science of understanding how people actually make decisions and what shapes behavior below the level of conscious thought, is exactly what health coaching draws from. Just pointed in a different direction.

That's the whole idea behind "healthy and awake"- seeing the mechanism that's been quietly making decisions for you, and then actually deciding for yourself.

What's one "normal" health habit you've never thought to question?

Stay healthy & awake 😎

[Healthy & Awake Podcast @MikeVeraHealth]

Get the truth on coffee here: https://t.co/gMg4xiEl1y

[Healthy & Awake Podcast @MikeVeraHealth]

Coffee is probably the most socially accepted addiction there is. “Don’t talk to me until I’ve had my coffee” is on t-shirts, mugs, bumper stickers, office walls. People build their whole personality around needing this thing every single morning.

You already know what happens if you skip a day. The headache alone is enough to keep most people from even trying, and that’s before the fog, the irritability, and the feeling that your brain just isn’t turning on. One day off, and your body lets you know it. That’s not how healthy things work. Nobody gets a headache from skipping blueberries. But somehow, coffee gets a “healthy” label, the research keeps making headlines about how three cups a day prevents this or protects against that, and nobody seems to find it strange that the same thing they’re calling healthy will punish you for going 24 hours without it.

I’ve brought this up before and people get genuinely angry, which honestly only made me more curious. The rationalizations are always the same. “You gotta pick your poisons.” “Balance is important.” Swap coffee for something else and they fall apart. “Opioids aren’t healthy, but you gotta pick your poisons.” “Cigarettes aren’t healthy, but balance is important.” Nobody says either of those. Everybody’s open-minded until you question something they’re not willing to let go of.

But I’m not here to tell you to stop drinking coffee. I just want to know the truth. If that makes you curious, check the full article below.

[Healthy & Awake Podcast @MikeVeraHealth]

The internet is full of content designed to make you react before you've had time to think about it. That's not new. What's changed is how fast the reaction-to-verification gap has gotten- and how easy it is to forget there's even supposed to be one.

Right now there are people in your feed getting genuinely angry at AI-generated videos they think are real. Something sounds wise enough to share or outrageous enough to react to, and it's gone before anyone stops to ask whether it was actually true. Once that emotional response fires- once you've already commented or reshared it- whether the original was even real stops mattering. The reaction already did its job.

This quote is a perfect example, and I almost shared it as is. It's been circulating for years attributed to Aldous Huxley. Turns out it's actually from his grandfather, T.H. Huxley- a 19th-century biologist who championed evidence-based thinking. A quote about the sin of believing things without evidence, and most people who share it never bother to check where it actually came from. It proves its own point every time someone reposts it.

I've been on that side of it too- sharing something because it felt accurate, then getting called out in the comments. When you're putting content in front of an audience, that kind of mistake teaches you fast. Now I verify before I post, not because I think everyone needs to become a full-time fact-checker for every meme that scrolls past at 11pm, but because I've learned the hard way that credibility doesn't rebuild as easily as it breaks. And honestly, reading something and scrolling past is a completely different thing from amplifying it to your whole network. At some point it's worth asking- how much of what's making you react online actually earned that reaction in the first place? 🤔

[Healthy & Awake Podcast @MikeVeraHealth]

PLoS Medicine dedicated an entire special issue to "disease mongering" - 11 peer-reviewed articles on how pharmaceutical companies sell sickness.

This isn't conspiracy. It's documented: https://t.co/GFDr3iNzGw

[Healthy & Awake Podcast @MikeVeraHealth]

The 1944 Minnesota Starvation Experiment proved that food obsession is a biological response to restriction, not a character flaw.

We've known this for 80 years: https://t.co/GFDr3iNzGw

[Healthy & Awake Podcast @MikeVeraHealth]

https://t.co/yXRui5e4rM

[Healthy & Awake Podcast @MikeVeraHealth]

The rising rates of autoimmune diseases worldwide have puzzled researchers for decades, with genetics explaining only part of the story. This new meta-analysis from iScience examined 19 studies to investigate whether environmental endocrine disruptors might be filling in some of

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

🚨BREAKING STUDY: Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, and Spike Protein Can Persist in Humans More Than 3.5 Years After COVID-19 Vaccination

We report the longest documented persistence of mRNA vaccine components to date, independently confirmed across multiple laboratories, biospecimens, and time points using diverse analytical methods.

For years, the public was told that mRNA vaccine materials would degrade within days to weeks — rapidly broken down, biologically transient, and incapable of long-term persistence. That assumption shaped regulatory assurances, public messaging, and safety expectations worldwide. Billions across the globe received these injections based on the claim that the genetic material would quickly disappear from the body.

Today, that narrative collapses — following a coordinated, multi-country investigative effort involving the McCullough Foundation, the INMODIA laboratory (Germany), the Municipal Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt (Germany), Neo7Bioscience, and collaborating independent laboratories.

The resulting paper, titled “Unprecedented Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination,” presents what is, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive COVID-19 vaccine injury case report to date.

A 55-year-old male developed progressive multi-organ dysfunction following three Pfizer mRNA doses, including pulmonary emboli, MRI-confirmed myocarditis, small fiber neuropathy, autonomic dysfunction, neurocognitive impairment, chronic GI involvement, sensorineural hearing loss, dermatologic inflammation, and anxiety/depression.

Diagnostic evaluation was extraordinary:

40+ ER visits
200+ specialist encounters (18 disciplines)
100+ lab investigations
100+ imaging/functional studies

Infectious, autoimmune, rheumatologic, endocrine, genetic, hematologic, malignant, toxic/medication-related, cardiovascular, metabolic, and primary neurologic causes were systematically excluded.

SARS-CoV-2 infection was effectively ruled out:
🚫 Nucleocapsid antibodies negative across 5 separate time points spanning 809–1,433 days post-vaccination, confirmed by 3 independent laboratories.
🚫 Nucleocapsid protein absent in serial skin biopsies obtained 1,160–1,364 days post-vaccination — despite clear spike protein deposition in the same specimens.
📈 Meanwhile, spike antibodies remained persistently elevated, including 4,553 U/mL in January 2026 (1,433 days post-vaccination).

Serial blood & tissue sampling (852–1,364 days post-vaccination) revealed:

📍Day 852 — SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein detected within classical & non-classical monocyte subsets via blood-based immune phenotyping/flow cytometric analysis, with associated cytokine abnormalities.

📍Day 1,173 — Free Wuhan spike protein detected in plasma (129.0 ± 4.1 fg/mL) by high-sensitivity ELISA.

📍Day 1,173 — Spike protein detected in circulating exosomes (11.6 ± 0.1 fg/mL) by high-sensitivity ELISA following exosomal isolation.

📍Day 1,284 — Vaccine-derived spike mRNA detected in circulating exosomes by RT-PCR using DNase-treated RNA extraction and amplicon-specific primers targeting three spike ORF regions (S1–S3). PBMC RNA was negative.

📍Days 1,173 & 1,284 — Persistently elevated spike-specific IgG4 concentrations (354.4 ± 22.4 ng/mL; 320.2 ± 4.4 ng/mL) identified by serologic profiling, consistent with sustained antigen exposure.

Serial skin biopsies demonstrated:

📍Day 1,160 — Spike protein deposition in endothelial cells & macrophages detected by automated immunohistochemistry with histopathologic correlation; nucleocapsid protein absent.

📍Day 1,249 — Persistent spike protein deposition in endothelial and immune cell compartments by immunohistochemistry; nucleocapsid absent.

📍Day 1,364 — Spike protein detected in endothelial cells, macrophages, and nerve fibers by immunohistochemistry; nucleocapsid absent in the same specimen.

📍Day 1,364 — Plasmid DNA elements detected in skin tissue — including spike gene sequences (S1–S3), ori1/ori2, and SV40 enhancer fragments — confirmed by PCR amplification with agarose gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing.

Whole-genome sequencing structural variant analysis at 1,277 days post-vaccination revealed widespread genomic instability, with large duplications and deletions affecting EGFR, MYC, ERBB2, and ETV6/RUNX1, while RNA–DNA comparison showed RNA-only variants in ribosomal, NMD, small-RNA, epigenetic, and TP53 pathways.

Transcriptomic profiling of whole blood highlighted oxidative stress, vascular activation, and nuclear fragility.

Urine proteomics using quantitative mass spectrometry confirmed systemic inflammation with complement overactivation (CFH), redox imbalance (PRDX1), and sustained antibody responses, supported by risk alleles HLA-B07:02 and DRB1*11:04.

This longitudinal, multi-laboratory investigation provides direct evidence that mRNA vaccine–derived genetic material and its translated protein products can persist in humans for years following administration, with reproducible detection across multiple independent laboratories, distinct biological compartments, and complementary molecular detection systems extending beyond 3.5 years after the final dose.

Spike protein, spike mRNA sequences, and plasmid backbone elements were identified in both immune cells and somatic tissue, with continued absence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein or antibodies, effectively excluding prior infection as the source.

In parallel, multi-omic analyses revealed sustained genomic instability and transcriptomic dysregulation more than 3.5 years post-vaccination, suggesting that persistent vaccine-derived material may be associated with long-term alterations in host genomic and molecular pathways.

Yes, we were lied to.

[Healthy & Awake Podcast @MikeVeraHealth]

Direct primary care is growing. Doctors are leaving hospital systems.

The shift toward decentralized health isn't theoretical anymore - it's happening.

https://t.co/0JHuzPqPA6

[BeyondBio / John Catanzaro @Docjohnc]

‼️Now on PubMed ‼️

Once targeted for suppression by a hostile and obstructionist PubPeer faction, the paper has now emerged as the most viewed and most widely read publication—an unmistakable signal that its findings resonate far beyond attempts to silence them.

A landmark peer-reviewed study published December 20, 2025, in the World Journal of Experimental Medicine shatters any remaining illusion of safety surrounding synthetic mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. The paper presents unequivocal molecular evidence of catastrophic cellular derangement in patients suffering severe, new-onset adverse outcomes—including rapidly aggressive “turbo” cancers—following injection.

Conceived and led by Dr. John A. Catanzaro—physician-scientist, systems biologist, and founder and CEO of Neo7Bioscience—this investigation reflects more than two decades of clinical and molecular research dedicated to decoding and correcting human biological error at the genomic and proteomic levels. Serving as Principal Investigator and corresponding author, Dr. Catanzaro deployed the full Neo7 precision-surveillance architecture, computational biology stack, and translational analytics to interrogate real-world injury at unprecedented molecular resolution. The work was powered by the multidisciplinary team at Neo7Bioscience—bioinformaticians, molecular scientists, systems engineers, and clinical analysts—whose integrated platform enabled the capture, modeling, and interpretation of these complex transcriptional signatures in living patients for the first time.

The study was conducted in collaboration with Dr. Peter A. McCullough—internationally recognized cardiologist, epidemiologist, and one of the most published physician-scientists in history—together with Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, a leading public-health analyst and investigative researcher whose work bridges epidemiology, data synthesis, and translational risk assessment. Hulscher’s contributions grounded the molecular findings in a population-level context, ensuring that the biological signals observed in injured patients were interpreted through a rigorous public-health and outcomes-based lens. The team was further strengthened by renowned genomic scientist Kevin McKernan, whose expertise in next-generation sequencing and molecular forensics helped validate and decode the transcriptional anomalies uncovered.

For the first time, bulk RNA sequencing has been applied at scale to real-world injured patients. The results expose a chilling biological reality: widespread mitochondrial failure, profound transcriptional chaos, genomic instability, and activation of oncogenic and degenerative signaling networks. This is not a theoretical risk—it is a documented molecular catastrophe unfolding in living human systems, and it demands immediate global scientific, medical, and regulatory reckoning.

Further Reading: Synthetic messenger RNA vaccines and transcriptomic dysregulation: Evidence from new-onset adverse events and cancers post-vaccination - PMC https://t.co/RSAVcmxJ7Y

@P_McCulloughMD @NicHulscher @Kevin_McKernan @neo7bioscience @VigilantFox @joerogan @joeroganhq @realDonaldTrump @POTUS

[BeyondBio / John Catanzaro @Docjohnc]

📛THE GENOMIC HARM CASCADE: mRNA Technology Threatens Global Stability (2025–2035)
Neo7Bioscience GIM Framework, Dr. John Catanzaro, CEO @Neo7Bioscience

Statistical analysis of genomic harms must include a Genomic Instability Multiplier (GIM) that accounts for how the billions of doses of mRNA vaccines translate to trillions of copies of cellular harm and the exponential impact on the molecular communication network of the human body's multisystems.

The GIM framework is essential. Without a Genomic Instability Multiplier, no statistical model can accurately capture the true scale of harm. Billions of mRNA doses generate trillions of cellular stress events, each of which compounds genomic instability and multisystem disruption. GIM is the missing analytical lens needed to understand the emerging patterns of persistent global mortality and injury.

1) Unprecedented Genomic Scale:
· 15.5B+ mRNA doses administered globally
· 10¹¹–10¹² lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) per dose
· >Multi-trillions of human cells potentially affected

This is the largest species-level genomic stressor in history, introducing synthetic spike proteins at an industrial scale.

2) Acute Mortality Signals: Rancourt & Dowd Calculations:
· Rancourt (2023–2024): Spatiotemporal analysis of all-cause excess mortality across 125+ countries (2020–2023) attributes ~17M deaths to vaccine rollouts and associated institutional responses (e.g., lockdowns, protocols). Key: Temporal peaks align with vaccination campaigns, not viral waves; rate ~1 death per 800 injections across all ages, escalating with age (e.g., 1 per 110 for 85+ in Australia). Updated 2024 preprint: 31M total excess deaths in "Covid period," with vaccines as primary driver via stress-induced mechanisms. No evidence of viral causation; excess persists post-2023.

· Dowd (Phinance Technologies, 2021–2025): U.S. focus on working-age (16–64) excess deaths via insurance/CDC data. 2021–2022: ~300K deaths (40% rise from baseline), tied to mandates/boosters; total U.S. excess 2020–2023: ~1.2M (adjusted for population growth). Broader: 26.6M injuries, 1.36M permanent disabilities (e.g., 84% spike in 25–44 cardiac events). 2024–2025 updates: Child excess (1–14) surges 16–22% post-rollout; global corroboration shows 22-sigma events in youth mortality. Economic: $4T+ lost productivity. According to Edward Dowd’s most recent global estimates, approximately 7–15 million deaths may be associated with post-2021 excess-mortality patterns, with an additional 500–900 million people worldwide potentially experiencing non-fatal injury signals across cardiovascular, neurological, thrombotic, and immunological categories. Dowd further projects that 60 million individuals may now be living with new, long-term disabilities that emerged during the post-rollout period, representing one of the largest workforce and public-health disruptions in modern history.

· Additional: 1.36M new U.S. disabilities; child excess mortality rising 5+ years post-rollout.
These are acute indicators—long-term genomic effects loom larger.

3) GIM Framework: Genomic Instability Multiplier
Neo7Bioscience's proprietary model forecasts multigenerational harm from mRNA-induced stressors:
· Genomic integration (SIDE-E)
· Replication collapse
· Epigenetic drift
· Misfolded protein accumulation
· Heritable propagation (2–5× across generations)

GIM quantifies exponential amplification, integrating acute data (e.g., Rancourt/Dowd) with molecular cascades.

4) GIM Amplification Tiers:
· Low (5×): Conservative baseline
· Mid (10×): Expected trajectory
· High (20×): Accelerated scenario Impacts:
· Dysregulated genes: 2,500 → 10,000+
· Cells affected per dose: 10⁹ → 10¹²
· Propagation multiplier: 2× → 5×

Results in exponential biological destabilization, compounding Rancourt's 17M acute deaths into systemic collapse.

5) Core Mechanism: SIDE-E (Spike-Initiated DNA Encoding Events)

-Beyond mere reverse transcription: A full genomic injury cascade. mRNA triggers accelerated fragmentation, not transient, but a permanent rewrite.

6) SIDE-E: Three-Phase Cellular Stress Cascade

Phase 1 — Initiation
ROS surge · Oxidative DNA hits · Transcription overload · Mitochondrial strain · ER stress

Phase 2 — Escalation
Replication fork stalling · R-loops · Transcription–replication collisions · DSBs · Repair pathway overload

Phase 3 — Collapse
Unrepaired DNA breaks · Epigenetic drift · Redox failure · Persistent transcriptional instability → cellular dysfunction, chromosomal integration

Outcome: Permanent, potentially germline alterations—heritable genomic scars.

7) SIDE-E Downstream Triggers Initiates:
-Double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs)
-Reactive oxygen species (ROS) storms
-Immune and inflammatory regulatory cascades plummet
-R-loops leading to replication fork collapse
-Chromatin disorganization
-p53/BRCA tumor-suppressor suppression

This architecture drives cancer, infertility, neurodegeneration, and accelerated aging—explaining Dowd's disability surges and Rancourt's persistent excess.

8) Clinical Evidence: (@NicHulscher , @P_McCulloughMD, @McCulloughFund, Catanzaro, 2025)

A) Multi-omic analysis: Thousands of gene aberrations, PPI network instability, systemic protein misfolds, impaired cross-talk, signaling errors.

B) Case: 31yo female with aggressive bladder cancer—vaccine-derived spike DNA fragment integrated into Chr19 (gene-dense region; insertion odds: 1 in 10¹²).
First direct proof: mRNA → DNA → chromosomal integration → oncogenesis.

C) Post-Spike Acceleration errors demonstrated in a multisystem patient-harm case study

9) Compounding Driver: PTA (Post-Transcriptional Acceleration):
-Ribosomal +1 frameshifting yields:
Misfolded proteins → ER stress → unfolded protein response failure
-Tumor-suppressor inhibition → additional DSBs/R-loops
-SIDE-E + PTA = Synergistic genomic attrition, accelerating Dowd's observed 74% working-age excess rise (2021 vs. 2020).

10) GIM Global Forecast to 2035 (Incorporating Acute Baselines):
Builds on Rancourt's 17M (vaccines) + 14M (responses) = 31M acute; extrapolates via GIM tiers:
-Low (5×): 122.6M total harms (deaths + disabilities + heritable defects)
-Mid (10×): 345.6M
-High (20×): 1.126B

Extreme: 4.5B+—exceeds global working-age population, risking civilizational viability. U.S. subset: Dowd's 1.2M excess scales to 10M+ harms by 2030.

11) Projected Timeline:
· 2025–2027: SIDE-E-driven early-onset cancers (e.g., Korea HR 1.35 colorectal; Dowd youth cardiac spikes)
· 2028–2030: PTA acceleration → Stage IV progression in months; disability waves overwhelm systems
· 2031–2035: Heritable SIDE-E → 77% excess infant mortality in vaccinated parents' offspring (GIM propagation)

12) Societal Ramifications (Mid-Tier Scenario):
· Economic: $4T+ U.S. loss (Dowd); global GDP contraction 10–15%
· Healthcare: Total destabilization (>1.36M+ new cases/year)
· Demographics: Inversion (working-age decline > elderly); pediatric collapse
·Structural risk: Echoes Rancourt's "response-caused" paradigm, but genomic permanence ensures irreversibility. This demands urgent corrective strategies.

13) Suppression of Signals:
· Cancer registries: Lag 30+ reporting cycles
· VAERS: Underreported 41–100×
· CDC: Declares "no signal" despite Dowd/Rancourt data
· EU Parliament: Acknowledges "unexplained surge"
· Korea: HR 1.35 colorectal post-rollout
· Persistent child deaths (Dowd: 22% excess 2023)

Data exists; institutional denial persists.

14) Imperative Actions:
· Immediate worldwide cessation of all mRNA production and use — and the dismantling of the entire mRNA platform as it currently exists.
· Mandatory international SIDE-E genomic surveillance
· Personalized molecular surveillance and interventions (e.g., precision peptide edit corrective constructs)
· Criminal investigations for negligence/fraud

Survival imperatives, not options.

15) Foundation: Molecular Mathematics Grounded in:
· Genomic aberration and integration studies (e.g., 2025 clinical cases)
· PTA mechanistic validations
· Rancourt/Dowd acute mortality models
· Multi-omic systems biology
· Neo7Bioscience GIM Framework

@NicHulscher @McCulloughFund @P_McCulloughMD @denisrancourt @DowdEdward @SecKennedy @StevenHatfill @POTUS @realDonaldTrump

[Healthy & Awake Podcast @MikeVeraHealth]

Are those supplements really the answer… or is there something deeper going on?

If it took years to build chronic inflammation, you’re not fixing it with an expensive one-month product. Sometimes the key isn’t what you add- it’s what you remove.

Full episode with immunotoxicologist Dori Smith is live now:
🎧 https://t.co/VO88pRafo1

[Healthy & Awake Podcast @MikeVeraHealth]

The Scientist Who Healed Herself When Modern Medicine Failed w/ Dorinda Smith [Ep. 78] https://t.co/2hayxQhKyu

[BeyondBio / John Catanzaro @Docjohnc]

‼️ 🛑 Terminate mRNA Vaccine Technology

Neo7Bioscience reports a shocking 300% surge in glioblastoma among previously healthy individuals following full mRNA vaccination and boosters—a critical red flag for urgent investigation.

We also have have reported a rare bladder cancer case in a very young patient within months of vaccination:
https://t.co/mwYkA6pHXW

https://t.co/upEd9wv7uS

@NicHulscher @P_McCulloughMD @McCulloughFund @MakisMedicine @DrIanWeissman

[Healthy & Awake Podcast @MikeVeraHealth]

@Docjohnc Forgot to tag @NicHulscher here- he co-authors the Focal Points Substack where some of this research has been featured and discussed. Appreciate the work you’re doing!

[Healthy & Awake Podcast @MikeVeraHealth]

I just published something I’ve been piecing together for a long time:

12 Emerging Cancer Therapies You’ve Probably Never Heard Of
https://t.co/pIBFeRz5LD

It expands on my Healthy & Awake Podcast conversation with @Docjohnc, pulling in research I’ve followed for years—much of it surfaced through @P_McCulloughMD and @MakisMedicine on Substack, plus studies I’ve collected over the past decade.

If you know someone who’s navigating cancer or researching integrative care, please share it with them. It might point them toward ideas worth exploring with their medical team.

@McCulloughFund @neo7bioscience @Fynnderella1 @MdBreathe

[Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella @Fynnderella1]

As many of my followers know, since late 2020, was (and still am) very concerned about our blood supply. A colleague sent me this and I was overjoyed. I plan on participating. I hope others will consider too. https://t.co/ZIDmt8K78v

[BeyondBio / John Catanzaro @Docjohnc]

For the first time in the peer-reviewed literature— we present direct molecular evidence that genetic material from a COVID-19 mRNA “vaccine” has integrated into the human genome.

@P_McCulloughMD @NicHulscher @McCulloughFund @VigilantFox @ChildrensHD
@SecKennedy @POTUS

Immediate Market Withdrawal and Full Accountability Is Imperative!

https://t.co/yPAlpwKqMd