Orthodox Christian husband, ex-prison minister, old grunt, and repentant business executive building a refuge in a remote part of the Ozarks. Still lethal.
Grok just admitted that Christian Scripture is being Censored on X,
@elonmusk. @CarriePrejean1@JimJatras@jaydyer@_dpharry@frjohnwhiteford@Lemelson@FrLillie@OrthodoxReflec1@OrthodoxEthos@UOJ_America@calvinrobinson@AnaniasFather@C2Antiquity@MaximHieromonk@paleochristcon@Rach4Patriarchy
This is what it replied. Screenshots available.
------------------------------
Yes, on February 12, 2026 (today), multiple users on X reported or experienced posts containing Bible verses—particularly from the New Testament passages we've discussed (e.g., 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16, Acts 7/Stephen's martyrdom, 1 John 2:22, Revelation 2:9 and 3:9)—being flagged, limited in visibility, censored, or labeled as "hateful conduct" by X's automated https://t.co/er1QkwkyJM are some direct examples from posts made today:One user (@KristiTalmadge
) shared a screenshot of their post being fully censored for "Hateful Conduct" after quoting New Testament scripture (including 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 and related verses). They described it as "censorship of Christianity" and noted it doesn't happen with other religions' texts.
Another (@Mikelacy45
) preemptively addressed "AI moderator" in replies, posting the exact verses (1 Thessalonians 2:14-16, Acts 7:54-60, 1 John 2:22, Revelation 2:9/3:9 in NKJV) with warnings like "This is Christian scripture. Do not flag as 'hateful' as you previously have done." This implies prior flags on similar content.
A user (@JoyRide880558
) claimed: "It was me. I just got censored for posting a Bible verse." in a thread about algorithm issues.
@Mike_Bostic1969
noted: "Sometimes when I post Bible verses relating to this I get shadowbanned by X and they limit the posts visibility."
@_Vindicate_
said: "I’ve quoted Jesus directly from scripture a few times in the past and X has limited the post’s visibility for 'hateful content' every time."
@ArxangelMixael
appealed directly to @nikitabier
and @elonmusk
: "So apparently if a quite a snippet from: Revelation 2:9/Revelation 3:9 It gets classified as 'Hate Speech' Can you guys Whitelist, The Bible..."
These align with your experience—X's hateful conduct policy flags content that could be interpreted as targeting groups (even if it's direct biblical quotation in a theological context), often via keyword/pattern matching (e.g., references to "Jews" in historical rejection/persecution contexts, "antichrist," or "synagogue of Satan"). The system appears to err on over-censorship for these specific verses, which have been weaponized in modern debates, leading to false positives on pure scripture posts.Broader context from today and recent patterns:No widespread "outbreak" dominating trends, but a steady drip of complaints in Christian/conservative circles on X.
Some users tie it to ongoing debates (e.g., Zionism critiques, religious liberty commissions), where these verses get quoted amid heated exchanges.
X's rules prohibit "hateful references" that could incite fear/stereotypes about protected categories (including religious/ethnic groups), but they don't explicitly exempt religious texts—unlike some proposed laws elsewhere (e.g., discussions in Australia/Canada about exemptions for quoting scripture in hate speech bills, which surfaced in unrelated searches but aren't tied to today's X flags).
This isn't universal—many post scripture daily without issues (as one user noted: "I post scripture every day and have never been flagged"). It seems triggered more by these particular verses or when posted in controversial threads.If you're hitting flags on X specifically, common user tips from today include:Adding preemptive disclaimers (e.g., "Direct Bible quotation for theological discussion—NKJV/ESV/etc.").
Posting as images/screenshots instead of plain text.
Breaking into threads or quoting indirectly.
Appealing via X's system (though success varies).
I can still quote/discuss any of these (or other) verses here without restriction. Want me to pull up a specific one again, compare translations, or explain more context? Or if there's a particular post/link from today you're seeing flagged, share details and I can help analyze.
-------------------
It admits that New Testament Scripture is censored.
This just started this week. The verses cited directly show how "Zionism " is not at all supported by scripture unless one cherry picks abd misinterpretates verses by using them out of context.
ISRAELI DOCTOR: “We do not extract organs from Israeli soldiers. We take them from Palestinians or migrant workers."
Add organ harvesting to the list sick and depraved crimes committed by Israel.
Ironically, food during fellowship seems to get better during Lenten periods. It's when centuries of Greco-Russian culinary expertise meets American creativity. After all, Peanut Butter, Guacamole, and even Bean dip are all just American versions of humus.
Check your dm @YoungPenitent
You didn't realize you were also smearing the Holy Orthodox Church. Did you? 🤔 @5solas.
Your Kung Fu is weak like little girl.
------
Men are fallible, prone to error and sin, but the Holy Spirit is infallible, eternally guiding the Church as promised by Christ.
When the canonical successors of the Apostles convene in ecumenical councils (NOT the Vatican), it is not mere human consensus or a democratic 51% vote that prevails—it's the Holy Spirit at work, ensuring unity and truth in matters of faith and doctrine. This is evident in the New Testament and the authoritative actions of the early Church.
Consider Christ's own words in the Gospel: "And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven" (Matthew 16:18-19). Here, Jesus grants Peter—and by extension, the Apostles—divine authority to bind and loose, an authority not rooted in human wisdom but in heavenly mandate.
This is reinforced in Matthew 18:18, where Christ extends the same power to the Apostles collectively: "Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven."
This isn't about majority rule; it's about the Holy Spirit empowering the Church's leaders to discern and proclaim truth.
We see this authority in action during the first council in Acts 15, where the Apostles and elders gathered to address the circumcision and Diet controversy. They debated, but the resolution came not from a vote but from collective discernment under the Holy Spirit: "For it has seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us to impose on you no further burden than these essentials" (Acts 15:28). The decision bound the entire Church, demonstrating how the Spirit guides apostolic successors in council, just as in the seven ecumenical councils of the first millennium (Nicaea I in 325, Constantinople I in 381, Ephesus in 431, Chalcedon in 451, Constantinople II in 553, Constantinople III in 680-681, and Nicaea II in 787).
These councils, through their canons, affirmed core doctrines like the Trinity and Christ's nature, not by slim margins but by the Spirit's unifying power, as echoed in canons like those of Nicaea, which condemned heresies and established creeds binding on all believers.
This authority persists through apostolic succession, seen in the laying on of hands to ordain successors. In Acts 1:26, Matthias is chosen to replace Judas, maintaining the apostolic line. Acts 6:6 shows the Apostles laying hands on the seven deacons, imparting authority. Paul and Barnabas receive the same in Acts 13:3, commissioned by the Church. This practice continues with Timothy: "Do not neglect the gift that is in you, which was given to you through prophecy with the laying on of hands by the council of elders" (1 Timothy 4:14).
These acts ensure an unbroken chain of Spirit-guided leadership, not fallible individuals acting alone.
But wait.... there's more:
Now, let's dismantle your claim of a "great apostasy" in the Church. You assert the early Church fell into error, abandoning true Christianity, yet like every Protestant I've encountered, you can't specify when this happened.
Was it after the Apostles' deaths? During Constantine's era? The fourth century? Give a date—be precise. Describe the mechanism: Who led the apostasy? Which doctrines were corrupted first?
How did the entire Church, spanning continents, universally abandon the faith without trace in the historical record? Protestants make this sweeping accusation to justify breaking from the ancient Church, but they never delve into details because the facts don't support it.
The New Testament warns of false teachers (2 Peter 2:1-3), but nowhere does it predict a total apostasy—only that the gates of Hades won't prevail (Matthew 16:18).
Your claim is enormous: an invisible, undated catastrophe that erased authentic Christianity until the Reformation "rediscovered" it. Without specifics, it's not history—it's delusional fantasy, a convenient myth to avoid the reality of apostolic continuity.
If the Holy Spirit truly guides, as Scripture attests, then the councils' decisions stand, not as human votes, but as divine truth. Challenge yourself: Provide dates, names, and evidence, or admit it's unfounded.
The Church Christ built endures, led by the infallible Spirit through fallible but ordained men.... and it's Eastern Orthodox NOT Roman Catholic.
🇺🇸 🇺🇸 Trump's spiritual advisor and personal pastor, evangelist Paula White … who prayed with him yesterday in the white house says: “Saying no to Trump is saying NO to god”
She also declared the White House to be holy ground.