@Allen12545830 @mattsheffield@JuIianAssagne@Comey@realDonaldTrump immunity for a conversation about national security and breaches ... yeah. that makes them all so bad. why would anyone think negative on a meeting with assange about solving a very cirtical situation meaning leaked information and how to move forward with this information.
@MollyMcKew nobody is good or bad. but he has info that would definitley be helpful and could be crossed checked. They were interested for that reason, not to make Assange a hero. But everybody is way too envolved on a personal level it seems to actually see the chance to get some truth.
@MollyMcKew maybe you need to read again. it says there was a deal to be made that would have solved problems in security and given more info on the question if Russia was a part. Why not meet with Assange and get more details? Because maybe there are details nobody SHOULD see.
@LouiseMensch@911CORLEBRA777 @FelisDave @thespybrief@xtrixcyclex@counterchekist@ericgarland@wikileaks they should have done the deal, gotten the info who hacked it, fixed the breach and be happy they weren't embarrassed any further. maybe you should take a step back and reevaluate. or ask your government. if you can still find someone you can trust there. So not Comey.
@emptywheel@nycsouthpaw you obviously never used signal. just because warner deleted them doesn't mean that waldman had the same setting. If he didn't, the texts weren't deleted on his phone.
@epicciuto if someone stole all your money out from under your nose, especially if it's people you paid to take care of it and trusted with it, would you not sue them?