Antonio Rabbi Comma

[Thanos Angelopoulos @Th_Angelopoulos]

It is not just the far right. It is the media themselves, including the so-called progressive ones.

Violence in Britain has fallen 83% since the mid-1990s. Burglary 86.6%. Vehicle theft 86.4%. ONS, Crime Survey for England and Wales, forty years of data.

89.5% of prisoners serving for violence against the person are British nationals. 89.4% for sexual offences. 73% of the prison population is white.

Convictions by ethnicity are 84% white, matching population share almost exactly. Violence is the largest arrest category at 47%, and the MOJ confirms this is "broadly consistent across ethnic groups".

The disproportionality is in drug offences and weapons possession, not violent crime.

The Oxford Migration Observatory found that controlling for age and sex, foreign nationals are underrepresented in prison: 3,193 fewer than demographics predict.

The LSE found "the increase over time in offending is much stronger among the British than the Foreigners. Indeed there is essentially no change in the violent incarceration rate of foreigners over the whole period in spite of the two large immigrant waves that occurred".

A study of 55 countries over three decades (Journal of Economic Perspectives) found no correlation between immigration and crime. Homicide fell by a third globally from 1990 to 2019 while the immigrant population grew by two thirds. A separate analysis of 216 regions across 23 European countries found "no significant link between immigration levels and crime rates".

Yet the public believes the opposite. A MORI survey found the British public believed 23% of the population was foreign born. At the time, the actual figure was around one in nine. The public perceives the most negative impact of immigration to be crime. The data says foreign nationals are underrepresented in violent crime. That gap is not an accident. It is a product.

Violent crime is over 60% of tabloid crime coverage despite being 20% of reported crime. An analysis of 402,819 articles found the immigration-crime link in public perception exists because of selective coverage and breaks when native criminality is given equivalent prominence.

Arendt (2010) found over-representation of "foreign crime" articles directly led to readers overestimating foreign offenders.

Blinder and Jeannet (2017, British Journal of Political Science) showed media depictions directly affect the accuracy of British public perceptions.

The Erasmus study found coverage "disproportionately focused on crimes involving immigrants, fueling misconceptions even when data showed no substantial increase". A CEPR study found this coverage directly increased populist voting by 5%.

And it is not just the tabloids. Conservative papers focus on immigrant crime. Liberal and progressive papers focus on "group-related problems". Both frame immigration through threat.

A study of 40,000 articles found systematic bias against Muslims across UK media. The BBC, Sky, ITV, the Times, the Guardian: they all amplify crime when the perpetrator is an immigrant or non-white, not because it is more common, but because it is more engaging.

A domestic murder in Sunderland does not get 3.4 million views. A white British man who commits one of the nine out of ten violent offences in this country does not trend.

The result: a population that believes crime is rising when it has collapsed, believes immigrants are dangerous when they are statistically less so, and believes the country was safer decades ago when every dataset says the opposite.

The far right did not build this machine. The media did. The far right just learned how to drive it.

[Antonio Rabbi Comma @MissedTheMarx]

@RedRobinUK @investor_bod @patcondell What happened to the figures after 2005?

[yeshiva frat leader @TullamoreJew_]

I don't think extremely rare random acts of violence should determine national policy

[Antonio Rabbi Comma @MissedTheMarx]

@DweeBwae @TheEggpie Yeah I think the thing to remember is that these are traders in a far-flung outpost of the Norse world, living in a mostly male society, so yeah they probably don't keep up to the same hygiene standards as the homeland.

[Thanos Angelopoulos @Th_Angelopoulos]

You say that post-Floyd DEI training created the policing culture that killed Henry Nowak. This is testable. If you're right, the pattern should begin after 2020. It doesn't.

Christopher Alder, 1998. Falklands veteran. Dragged handcuffed and unconscious into a Hull custody suite. Left face down on the floor. Officers stood around while he choked to death. Ten minutes before anyone helped. Inquest: unlawful killing. Five officers charged. All acquitted.

Sean Rigg, 2008. Schizophrenic man, died at Brixton police station after restraint. Inquest found "unsuitable and unnecessary force" and police failings "more than minimally" contributed to his death.

Robert Edwards, 2011. Died in a Suffolk cell. The IPCC found police "failed to take appropriate care" and didn't carry out proper welfare checks. The coroner said he should never have been deemed fit for detention.

Wayne Couzens, 2015–2021. Reported for indecent exposure in 2015. Kent Police had his name, address, and plate number. The investigating sergeant knew his brother, also a police officer. No action. Failed vetting twice, still became a Met officer. Exposed himself days before murdering Sarah Everard. The investigating officer lied about CCTV. Three forces had twenty years of red flags. Nothing to do with DEI

Post-Floyd, still no DEI involvement: Stephen Reardon, 2023, had seizures in a police van while the officer said he was "playing games". Died. Jerome Cowan, 2022, found unresponsive in a library, officers failed to provide first aid. Died. A man at St Erth, 2022, left drunk and vulnerable outside a railway station on a cold night, officers drove past without stopping. Died. All officers dismissed or facing gross misconduct.

Same pattern every time. A person in distress needs help, officers dismiss it or walk away. It happened in 1998, 2008, 2011, 2022, 2023, and 2025. DEI didn't create it. It predates it by a generation.

You also claim "determined, institutional silence". The Speaker acknowledged the case on 1 June. The Home Secretary called it "a horrifying act" and Digwa's false accusation "an evil act" in an oral statement to the Commons on 2 June. Debated in both Houses. Starmer and Baddenoch clashed over it. Front-page news for a week. There is no silence. You invented it because your baseless argument needs it.

You ask pretentiously what you call a system where a dying teenager's word counts for less than his killer's.

I'd ask you: what do you call a system where Christopher Alder choked to death on a custody floor in 1998 while officers stood around, and twenty-seven years later Henry Nowak bled to death saying the same words?

That is an ideology. But not the one you're describing. It's an institutional ideology of indifference to people in police custody, and it has been killing people for decades.

Blaming a training course that's existed for five years for a rot that's existed for hundreds of years isn't analysis. It's a deflection that protects the actual dangerous ideology.

[Dan Evans @dai_alectic]

Utterly damning. A disgrace. This is what happens when the union bureaucracy becomes severed from the rank & file, reduced to an arm of the Labour Party and career opportunity for labour spads

[Antonio Rabbi Comma @MissedTheMarx]

@MissInformx4f0 @BretDevereaux Religious tolerance was absolutely not a new thing, even in that region. The Achaemenid Persians from the time of Cyrus practiced religious tolerance, even for conquered peoples, a good 200 years before Alexander.

[George @SocDemGeorge]

They did it again

[lewis @Lewiswbt1]

LOUIS THEROUX: (shouting at ceiling) Hi Wallace, it's Louis. Are you coming down?
V.O.: I'd been told to expect the unexpected when Wallace came down for breakfast.
WALLACE: Be there in a minute! Enjoy the show!
LOUIS: (to Gromit) Is this normal?

[Antonio Rabbi Comma @MissedTheMarx]

@intentionalisms @souljagoyteller Of course they had an economic incentive! The last thing you want if you abolish the slave trade is other imperial powers to double down and try to leverage that into an advantage.

[Antonio Rabbi Comma @MissedTheMarx]

@Anarchosuchus @R0nStaedtler @Bigmonger Only the IWA-AIT, the CIT define themselves as "revolutionary syndicalist"

[Antonio Rabbi Comma @MissedTheMarx]

@RodDMartin @David6179188752 The trick is to force defensive engagements even as you're taking territory through manoeuvre and subterfuge. Austerlitz, for example, was set up as a defensive battle, Wellington was also a master of engineering a defensive situation, forcing the opponent to take the initiative.

[Antonio Rabbi Comma @MissedTheMarx]

@itsjohncrotty @KarolusWangus Michael O'Dwyer was an Irish Catholic who was lieutenant governor of Punjab from 1913-1919, (indirectly, but endorsed it afterwards) responsible for the most shocking act of imperial violence in India in the 20th century - the Jallianwala Bagh massacre.

[PRO-IWA KOREA | 국제노동자협회(IWA) 한국 지역 준비위 @PRO_IWA_KOREA]

전 세계 노동자 동지들께 연대의 인사를!

​한국 PRO IWA KOREA는 IWA 원칙을 지지하며, 이 땅에 아나코-생디칼리슴의 기치를 세우고자 합니다. 노동조합 설립과 운동의 확산에 함께하실 분들을 기다립니다.
​참여 문의: [email protected]
​#아나코생디칼리슴 #IWAAIT #아나키즘

[anna @jpadlovely]

the biggest disconnect between me and everyone mad at me today seems to be that idgaf that langdon committed a crime. just like I don’t care that dana punched someone. and I don’t care that mckay had an ankle monitor. and I don’t care that abbot forged papers. who cares acab

[Conner O'Malley @conner_omalley]

Irish Zionism

[Dohaciel Ygzgzot @ygzgzot]

“The worker only feels himself outside his work, and in his work feels outside himself. He feels at home when he is not working, and when he is working he does not feel at home. His labour is therefore not voluntary, but coerced; it is forced labour.”—Karl Marx

[Antonio Rabbi Comma @MissedTheMarx]

@Spectral___001 @Jimcrowdemocrat @asuka_aryan Oh I'm not saying Trianon was necessarily too harsh, just demonstrably harsher than Versailles.