@lexi_lambda As someone that's been using Racket/Scheme for a little over a year that's been learning Haskell for the last month, I think it comes down to two things: the explicit precedence (yay parens) in Scheme, and the density of non-obvious operators.
@tjmahr This is a really good example for the dangers of defaults in analysis software. Sometimes I think we should all be forced to specify all options at least one time per project. In practice it'd just lead to more copy and pasting from SO though.
This was a really interesting paper. I’ve always had this (maybe?) controversial opinion that neural networks are really good in domains where generalization is essentially overfitting. It explains why “data augmentation” helps them generalize.
John von Neumann: "with four parameters I can fit an elephant"
Meanwhile, this paper https://t.co/n15oCHoK3U: "How to fit any dataset with a single parameter"
Here's a function with a *single* parameter. Even worse: it's differentiable and continuous!
@PhDemetri Oh man, really? I do this to my coworkers, but it’s because I don’t want to interrupt their thinking time, and I usually have an open schedule. Do they secretly hate me?!
@ChelseaParlett I asked for a large bag of pepperoni to make pizza. They didn’t have that size, so they gave me *6* regular sized bags of pepperoni. The large was maybe 4oz bigger...
@PhDemetri@statacake A slight alteration of Fried Liver called the Lolli attack Nxd5 followed by d4 is my go to. It’s razor sharp if black deviates from their best line.