This really shouldn’t surprise anyone. The fact that it does says much about how we’ve been collectively conditioned to act against our interests. Obviously it doesn’t only apply to women as judges but any and all areas of public (as opposed to private/home) decision making.
Pensé que era joda pero no:
En un estudio científico, pusieron a gente a jugar un juego y a otra gente a observar a los jugadores.
Los que jugaban, lo hacían correctamente o haciendo trampas, y estaban conectados a unos cables de electroshock
Los que observaban, estaban conectados a sensores que medían la actividad cerebral.
Cuando a los que no hacían trampa les daban un electroshock, en los cerebros de todos los observadores -hombres y mujeres- se encendían los centros de empatía.
Pero acá viene la cosa: cuando a los que SÍ hacían trampa les daban un electroshock, en los cerebros de las mujeres se SEGUÍAN encendiendo los centros de empatía, pero en los de los hombres no sólo que no sino que -al contrario- se encendían los centros de placer. Los varones sentían placer por la justicia. A las mujeres las tenía sin cuidado, sólo respondían al sufrimiento inmediato.
Esto, sobre el tema de juezas mujeres en el poder judicial.
Aquí el estudio:
https://t.co/BCbDmWzLgR
As we went from neutral world into negative world, it became extremely popular within evangelicalism to assert "this is good, actually" because soft persecution and an oppositional culture would mean conversions were more genuine.
It became a trope that the fire of affliction makes the church more pure.
Never did anyone analyze this from historical perspective of where dramatic cultural decline was actually good for the church anywhere. There is no good example historically of a society getting worse and the church getting better.
When a church faces any kind of persecution you have many who submit to its demands. Cultural decline means apostasy within the church even more than it means those who convert have negative incentive to do so and therefore theirs are genuine. Pastors and leaders conform to the oppositional culture far more than professors become more genuine. I don't think I have to provide any examples for you of this; we all see them everywhere.
This kind of thinking perfectly parallels accelerationism politically. No, things do not get better as things get worse. Everything gets worse; even the things you think will get better.
What is needed in both cases is men of adamantine will to stand for what is good, true, and beautiful.
Women and queers have taken over the Church of England.
We must ask, why has this been permitted?
“Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves.”
The CofE is a Church for sin, not sinners
Rejecting God’s word to put a woman in charge of your church during a Muslim invasion seems like an apocalyptic move for a country
But what do I know. I’m just a dumb hillbilly
Everything wrong with the Church of England in one photograph. The Dean of Canterbury (a homosexual in a civil partnership with another man) installing the fake Archbishopess (1 Timothy 2:12) on St. Augustine's chair as a gaggle of female clergy watch on. No wonder the CofE is dying, the hierarchy has completely sold out to the world, the flesh and the devil. The feminist take over is total, the full apostasy is now complete.
🚨 LEAKED FOOTAGE FROM O’HARE AIRPORT BAG ROOM — THIS IS WHAT THEY DO TO YOUR LUGGAGE WHEN YOU’RE NOT LOOKING
Suitcases getting LAUNCHED full force like garbage.
No hesitation. No care. Just straight impact.
This is the same bag you trust with everything you packed… getting thrown like this.
And airlines still charge you extra for it.
This isn’t a mistake.
It’s routine.
So when your bag shows up cracked open, items missing, or completely destroyed… was it ever “lost”… or just handled like this the entire time?
How many times has YOUR bag been treated like this?
We will not lie to the British people. Restoring Britain will require decisions that are controversial and unpleasant.
We are going to strip millions of healthy Brits who refuse to work of benefits. If that causes outrage from those who think the taxpayer owes them a living, so be it.
We are going to deport all illegal and burdensome migrants. If that means millions go, so be it.
We are going to outlaw incompatible cultural and religious practices. If that means those who refuse to integrate no longer feel welcome, so be it.
We are going to execute pedophiles, rapists, and murderers if that is what the British people want. If that means we are condemned by subversive "human rights" groups, so be it.
We take no pleasure in these measures. It is a damning indictment of our political class that they are necessary in the first place.
But necessary they are.
Christianity changed the world.
It changed the world so radically that in the countries of the West, most people think that the values and principles by which we live are simply natural.
They're not natural.
They're the result of the radical changes that the Christian gospel brought to our lands. It changed our culture; it changed the way we value and treat women; it changed the way we value and treat children.
You can see the evidence for yourself. It's right before your eyes. Look at the places where the Christian foundations of our civilization are being dismantled, despised, destroyed. See how women and children are being treated. See how human live is being valued.
What you're seeing is a small beginning of the return to how life used to be before our our culture was transformed by the gospel. The more we collectively turn our backs on God, the greater the horrors, injustices, and total disregard for human rights, the value of human life, and the dignity of the weak and the vulnerable.
No dancers, no costume changes, no over the top stuff, just a man and his band taking an entire stadium full of people by the hand and leading them wherever he wants. I miss when music was good!!🥰
Someone will ask why an account about nutrition and training has made a dozen posts on a bull in Ledbury, a goat without borders, and a ewe with a complicated relationship with topographic dips.
Here is why.
Because the argument that these animals are destroying the planet is not a fringe position. It is in the newspaper. It is in the policy document. It is in the dietary guideline. It is being taught to children and repeated by adults and acted on by governments and it is wrong, and it is wrong in a specific, demonstrable, measurable way that becomes obvious the moment you look at an actual field with an actual animal in it.
Gerald is not an abstraction.
Keith is not a statistic.
Doris is not a carbon calculation.
They are specific, real, working animals doing specific, real, measurable things to specific, real pieces of land, and the argument against them has never once required anyone to look at the land.
So we looked.
And the land is fine.
The land is better than fine.
The land is a meadow in Ledbury, a fell in the Lake District, and a Devon field with a rank corner that Keith has been improving without Brian's permission for four months.
Come back tomorrow.
There's more.
We put the land use argument to Keith.
Keith. You are occupying agricultural land that could, theoretically, be used to grow crops. How do you respond?
Keith stopped chewing.
He looked at the field.
The field is on a 30-degree slope in Devon. The topsoil is clay. The drainage is complicated. No tractor has successfully operated in the lower section without becoming a story people tell in the village pub.
Keith looked at us.
Keith, do you believe this field could produce food crops without you on it?
Keith walked to the lower section of the field. He ate a thistle. He stepped on a bramble runner and ate that too. He looked at the clay in the corner where it waterlogged every winter and produced nothing except rushes, which Keith also ate.
Are you saying the field is only productive because you're on it?
Keith looked at us with the expression of an animal that has grasped the argument entirely and found the question slightly beneath him.
He then left through the gate he had opened by himself.
He was in the road for nine minutes.
He ate a passing cyclist's energy bar.
We are not including this in the land use efficiency report.
This is profoundly true. From Galileo, through Newton and Leibniz, all the way to Heisenberg and Einstein, great scientific geniuses believed in God.
The figure of the nerdy atheist only emerged with Carl Sagan and Stephen Hawking. And the result is that contemporary science is stagnant due to nerdy positivism.
The nerd, in truth, does not love science - which is a divine gift -, but rather his own personal technical brilliance. This causes him to become mentally stagnant and never discover anything truly grand.