Former US🇺🇸 Treasury Official: 9/11 was the US’ new ‘Pearl Harbour’ moment to fight wars in the Middle East to establish GREATER ISRAEL over the last 25 years.’
‘It was during the George W. Bush administration, that we were hearing about the need to destroy seven countries in the Middle East in five years.
9/11 became the new Pearl Harbour for launching the American intervention in the Middle East on behalf of Greater Israel.
American troops and American money was used to destroy Libya, Iraq, Syria and turn them into dysfunctional countries. There’s no functioning state there.
We now see that Israel has the United States at work on Iran and Israel has again renewed its attacks on Lebanon. So the agenda is very much real, it’s very much in operation.
Washington has been fighting the Greater Israel cause for Netanyahu, for the first quarter of the 21st century. We’ve been at war for 25 years.’
-Prof. Paul Craig Roberts, former US Assistant Treasury Secretary for Economic Policy, speaking to us on Going Underground
Tras más de 16 meses secuestrado y torturado por "Israel", el médico palestino Hussam Abu Safiya, director del hospital Kamal Adwan en Gaza, apareció con vida en una imagen siendo "juzgado" por el apartheid sionista.
Hussam fue secuestrado por "Israel", que le mató además a su hijo, en venganza por salvar vidas palestinas en su hospital y no abandonar a sus pacientes, fue metido en una celda de aislamiento de dos metros sin comida, agua, medicinas ni acceso a su abogado... desde diciembre de 2024.
Fuck you, @washingtonpost . Amal did not ‘die,’ she was deliberately targeted and murdered after receiving threats from the Israeli army. She was in touch with us, her colleagues, during this situation. We all know exactly what happened. Shame on you for intentionally diminishing the criminality of the actions of the Israeli army with this headline. Shame on all of you and your correspondents in Beirut.
I hope to see you on trial for your propaganda in my lifetime.
If you read one article today, it should be former CIA analyst Paul Pillar’s alarm bell of how the Senate wants to force the US to share sensitive intel with Israel at the expense of the US itself.
“In intelligence, Israel is more of an adversary than an ally. Being an adversary in intelligence means indulging in the hostile act of espionage. Israel has a long record of conducting that type of hostile act against the United States.”
https://t.co/KpdR33YrTw
My post on Sazan Island went viral yesterday because the verifiable facts are shocking.
Here's what I left out: Sazan is just one piece of a much bigger operation.
Jared Kushner started Affinity Partners in July 2021. One day after leaving the White House.
Within weeks, Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund wired him $2 billion. Senior Saudi officials objected. Mohammed bin Salman overruled them.
By the end of 2024, Affinity was managing $4.8 billion, almost entirely from foreign governments. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE. Today that number is $6.16 billion. 99% from foreign nationals.
The fee structure, disclosed to the Senate Finance Committee under investigation: Kushner charges the Saudis 1.25% annually on $2 billion in committed capital. Other investors pay closer to 2%. The Senate's own investigators called this "unusually high" for a firm with Kushner's experience level, or more correctly, complete lack of experience. As of mid-2024, Affinity had generated zero return on investment and had not distributed a penny of earnings back to any client.
He's charging governments tens of millions a year to have their money sit in a bank account.
In late 2024, Senator Wyden referred Kushner to the Department of Justice for possible violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. The same law that put Paul Manafort in prison.
Now Kushner is back in government. Trump's "Special Envoy for Peace." Negotiating with Iran. Negotiating with Russia. Negotiating ceasefire terms in Gaza. On behalf of the United States. Not chosen by Americans. No experience running an investment firm. No training or experience in international relations. His sole credential is that he married the president's daughter. All while managing $6 billion from the governments he is negotiating with.
Before Trump's second term started, Kushner publicly promised he would not raise additional capital while serving. The New York Times then reported he was actively soliciting $5 billion more from foreign governments. His lawyers confirmed the conversations. They said he "does not intend" to take it.
He said the same thing before he took it the first time.
The Senate Finance Committee and the House Oversight Committee are both demanding answers. They've asked for every communication between Kushner and foreign governments. They've asked Affinity to preserve all documents. Any destruction of records, they said in writing, will be treated as obstruction.
Now look at the ownership chart below. It was produced as part of a corporate investigation published June 3rd titled "Exporting the Abraham Accords: The Hidden Network Converging on Albania's Shoreline." My follower @SlavicWoman777 flagged it in my replies.
Five unnamed Albanian shareholders. 24% combined stake. Structured deliberately just below the 25% threshold that would require public disclosure under Dutch law.
That is someone trying to hide who is behind the money.
This is what corruption looks like when it's wearing a suit and has a law firm on retainer.
What do you call it when your government's negotiator is on the payroll of the governments he's negotiating with?
🚨 BOMBSHELL: Amnesty International drops a massive report confirming the Israeli government is actively funding and directing ethnic cleansing in the
West Bank.
They expose how the state uses soldiers as rogue settlers to systematically erase entire Palestinian villages.
"Si los israelies no donan su propia piel ni sus órganos, por motivos religiosos, ¿como es posible que tengan el mayor banco de piel y órganos del mundo? ¿De donde lo sacan? Están expoliando a un pueblo hasta llegar a quitarles la piel".
La activista turca Aycin Kantoglu, miembro de la flotilla humanitaria Sumud, se cuestiona de donde salen los órganos y la piel que compone el banco donante más grande del mundo de "Israel".
🚨 Pentagon just blacklisted 188 Chinese companies (inc'l Baidu & Alibaba) as “military” entities.
Evidence? Zero.
Meanwhile Lockheed Martin rakes in $44B in Pentagon contracts and gets called “free market.”
The hypocrisy is off the charts!
Watch the full breakdown ⬇️
One of the most brutal scenes in human history has been leaked.
The moment the tents of displaced people were bombed in the southern Gaza Strip, in the Mawasi area of Khan Yunis, killing more than 500 civilians.
A video that the world must never forget.
🚨🚨EL DESASTRE de la Identificación Digital de la India es una ADVERTENCIA para el mundo⚠️
🔴HACKEARON el sistema digital de la India. Más de mil millones de personas se vieron obligadas a participar en un sistema biométrico que vinculaba la alimentación, las pensiones y la atención médica a una única identificación digital. ¿El resultado? Una CRISIS HUMANITARIA ⚠️
Los delincuentes piratearon y clonaron identidades, dejando a familias pasando hambre, a ancianos sin pensiones y a enfermos rechazados en los hospitales.⚠️😳
⚠️ESTAS SON LAS CONSECUENCIAS DE UNA SOCIEDAD DIGITALIZADA:
Con sólo presionar un botón, simplemente cancelan su cuenta. Ya no puedes comprar comida. Ya no puedes hacer nada ⚠️
US Puppet Marcos Stages Constitutional Coup to Crush Duterte Nationalists
Three weeks after staged gunfire in the Philippine Senate, a fake constitutional crisis is exploding.
Its goal: lock in US puppet Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. as unchallenged strongman while destroying Sara Duterte.
The Senate is split under two rival leaderships who call each other fake. Marcos — son of the old dictator, controlled by Washington via his family’s frozen billions — is grabbing all the power.
He rules by emergency orders, forces changes, and plans special sessions for his agenda.
This is no random mess.
It is open war between Marcos, America’s eager servant building bases against China, and the Duterte camp’s fight for true independence and friendly ties with Beijing.
The Dutertes refuse to make the Philippines America’s unsinkable aircraft carrier.
So Marcos unleashes raw lawfare: fake plunder charges and repeated impeachment attacks on Sara Duterte, plus the sham International Criminal Court “trial” of Rodrigo Duterte — a US-controlled political weapon against leaders who defy Washington.
May 11 revealed the script. The House impeached Sara Duterte again.
Pro-Duterte forces pushed back. Then came the staged shooting for chaos and cover.
Pure theater.
In June, the Marcos camp seized control, changed rules to weaken Duterte allies before Sara’s July impeachment trial, and called it legal.
It is a clear coup.
The real goal is total control for Washington: emergency powers, war budgets, and constitutional changes to allow more foreign bases, military sites, missiles, and troops — turning the Philippines into the Ukraine of Southeast Asia.
Peace and Chinese development are sacrificed for war risk.
Classic imperial playbook: install the weak dynasty, destroy nationalists with lawfare and crisis, then rewrite the Constitution for permanent foreign control.
Marcos calls it “rule of law.”
Real patriots see it as a slow US-orchestrated coup to kill the Duterte legacy and turn the country into a launchpad against China.
The Supreme Court is the last defense.
Not sure it will hold
🚨🚨EL VÍDEO MÁS PODEROSO QUE VERÁS HOY.
John Clauser, Premio Nobel de Física y 1,500 Cientificos más en Quantum Korea dicen:
"NO EXISTE Cambio Climático, NO EXISTE Emergencia Climática"
El Dr. Clause Agregó: "La narrativa del Cambio Climático es una PELIGROSA CORRUPCIÓN QUE AMENAZA LA ECONÓMIA A NIVEL GLOBAL" ⚔️🔥
🇨🇳 The West loves to lecture China about “democracy” while their own voters get more fed up with every election.
Politicians come and go, campaigns make all kinds of amazing promises. But once the votes are in, nothing really changes. The same groups stay in control and regular people are left waiting. Is that really what they call freedom of choice?
China operates on a completely different model. One that can be hard to understand and easy to misinterpret.
President Xi Jinping didn’t gain power through inheritance or wealth. He worked his way up for over forty years, serving at every tier: villages, counties, cities and provinces. He has spent his life governing, not just running for office. Top leadership is elected by the National People’s Congress, while local residents choose their community representatives, with the entire system built from the grassroots up.
The Communist Party of China is the world’s largest political organisation, with almost 100 million members rooted in communities nationwide. Its five-year plans aren’t just empty promises either; they get delivered. This is how China pulled hundreds of millions out of poverty, built the planet’s most extensive high-speed rail network and now takes the lead in electric vehicles, renewable energy and key cutting-edge technologies.
The country’s leadership has a clear mission: to rejuvenate the nation and work for the Chinese people. When people see real progress being made, the system stays stable, rather than cycling through one disappointment after another.
This is supported by the polls. Long-running research from Harvard Kennedy School shows Chinese public satisfaction with the government consistently sits above 90 percent. Edelman’s global trust surveys record government trust at 89 to 91 percent among the highest worldwide. National happiness scores range from 70 to 79 out of 100. Considering everything, it’s reasonable to argue he’s among the most effective national leaders in the world right now.
It’s understandable why the critics target this; after all, China keeps achieving things their nations simply cannot. If you witness this steady progress firsthand while living here in China, the reality is simply astonishing.
At the end of the day, I have to wonder: does that so-called Western freedom of choice truly deliver better lives for ordinary people, or is it just better marketing?
Every year, imperial propagandists ritualistically invoke this or that version of the 1989 events at Tiananmen Square to portray China as a murderous dictatorship. And every year, scores of people seek to rebut the claims by appeals to video footage and other evidence of what happened.
But I think we can be more forceful: Unlike in the Soviet Union, the Western-backed counterrevolution failed in China. Looking at the historic mortality crisis caused by capitalist restoration in Eastern Europe, this fact alone likely saved tens of millions of lives — and prevented imperialism from extinguishing the flame of socialism altogether.
From that perspective, the events of 1989 represent a major victory for socialism and the global working class. This, no doubt, is the primary source of the imperialists’ lingering outrage.
I was a rather precocious nine-year-old in Taipei on June 4th 1989. In my childish mind's eye...helpless students were kettled into Tienanmen square like animals in a pen before the tanks rolled over them, creating a kind of bloody, dense, student-patty. It was a flashbulb moment that represented the evil of the communist party of China and the destruction of the flower of China, the best of the best, by the worst of the worst.
Growing up sometimes means finding out the fairytales of your childhood is far more complicated than you thought.
This is Tienanmen Square 1989, as I understand it today. There was no bloodshed in the square. Dissident leader Liu Xiaobo (who subsequently won the Nobel Peace Prize) negotiated the peaceful withdrawal of demonstrators as the troops moved in. By the time the iconic Tankman stood in the way of PLA tanks, the crackdown was basically over. If you watch the video all the way through, you'll see tankman block the tank a few times, climb on top of it, before being led away.
This is not to say, of course, that there was no bloodshed. They mostly happened in clashes between violent demonstrators and PLA troops off the square. The "peaceful protestors vs brutal regime" picture is inaccurate and incomplete. The crowd ambused, mutilated, lynched, disembowled and burned the corpses of PLA soldiers. This is when the shootings happened: not in the square, not on the students.
You have to understand, in 1989, China didn't know how to deal with protests. They had no riot police. They rolled out the tanks and the troops not because they were determined to exterminate the crowd, but becauses they were unprepared. Since then, it's been largely a hushed and censored topic in China, which I think is a mistake. Because once you go through what actually happened, June 4th was a tragedy, not a crime.
It was Deng Xiaoping that made the decision to initiate the crackdown. He knew he'd bear the infamy. But looking at China in 2026, it's hard not to come to the conclusion that Deng did the right thing. The students in the square might have been truly idealistic and only wanted the best for China, but if the Chinese government have given in to their demands, China would not have been a democratic paradise but might have fallen into a chasm of chaos. We all saw what happened when the people of Russia cast off the Soviet Union only to be plunged into decades of pitch black despair. Had China done what the students asked, could the results have been any better? Already almost in retirement...Deng, who already saved China with his reform-and-open-up, arguably saved it again.
Most ordinary Chinese people I know now sees June 4th as an example of a failed color revolution, or an externally-driven attempt to destabilize China from the outside. They don't percieve the crackdown as the government oppressing the people, but of China asserting its sovereignty.
I know this is a controversial topic, and will probably draw a lot of condemnation from the usual crowd. So let me end with a criticism of the Communist Party of China: Stop censoring and shielding the history so much, and be frank about the past. When you try and erase June 4th, it means you yourself cannot tell your side of the story. The cultural revolution, for instance, works far less well as an anti-China talking point because the mistakes of that era are widely acknowledged and digested in China itself while June 4th still seems too raw to touch.
Below you can find the full "tankman" video. It only takes two minutes to watch. Try and watch it as if you're seeing it for the first time. What do you see? See less
June 3rd 1989, Beijing.
The terrorists have started firing .50 caliber machine guns at people, looting and burning military convoys. It was the rioters who started the violence
Our response was legal, lawful and righteous. The only pity was we let the terrorist leaders: Wand Dan, Wu'er Kaixi, and Chai Ling to escape to the US with the help of the CIA at the American embassy in Beijing.