@mikeroche@historyinmemes you've got it. the way to keep tuition down is obviously to have banks issue federally backed loans as middlemen, accepting the profit while leaving the government on the hook for the risk.
it just makes sense.
@Comptroller252@ThomasE57249211@LeeMZeldin again, you can't actually be this dumb.
the plane was painted to resemble civilian aircraft, not military. it attacked with hidden weaponry.
if you cannot see how that uses civilians as shielding, you actually might be as dumb as you are pretending to be.
@Comptroller252@ThomasE57249211@LeeMZeldin and they hid the weapons.
it was made to look like a civilian craft, not a military plane.
are you okay with using civilians as shields?
you know the difference. quit pretending.
@Comptroller252@ThomasE57249211@LeeMZeldin you aren't so dumb that you think camouflage is the same as disguising a military asset as a civilian asset.
you might be very dumb, but nobody is that dumb.
@TheTruth1021420@Mystek111@lawandglitter22@cturnbull1968@FBIDDBongino and you could recognize that he could "honestly" claim all background check requirements had been met even if some of those requirements were waived- as the article claims.
His post doesn't address the claims, it sidesteps them.
@TheTruth1021420@Mystek111@lawandglitter22@cturnbull1968@FBIDDBongino clearly he's counting on people like you having the inability to recognize when they're being conned.
he could have given a straight answer. he didn't. he just referenced unstated standards that may or may not exist, and you ate it up, because you lack critical thinking.
@FBIDDBongino he did not clarify anything.
in fact, it seems very clear that he went out of his way to obfuscate.
he did not say he underwent a new background check, or that he had retained a security clearance from his previous employment.
why not? because he didn't.
@musashi_riposte @AI_EmeraldApple@amuse what kind of jackass reneges on a contract on a house he bought weeks earlier?
being old doesn't make you a good person