@AbeNormal93@tmaxftw It’s the same amount of work regardless of the sale price. It should be either a flat fee or a flat fee plus a much smaller commission.
@Tech_Vikin@edgecase411@Tesla_AI Seeing exactly this as well on city streets. However, these interventions should be classified as navigation. Critical should be reserved for actual danger.
@bowste42@TheDivorceTeam@niccruzpatane The shortest version is, if I didn’t have a car at all and was starting front scratch, I’d buy the Y over the S.
Sounds like you feel differently, and that’s ok.
@virginiabeach1@TheDivorceTeam The engineering on the Y is better, as is the seating position and overall functionality. For example, acceleration isn't smooth because of the front CV joints.
The S is still a GREAT highway car and the seats nice and wide. But feels like a burden around town - even with FSD
@TheDivorceTeam@niccruzpatane I have a '24 Model S and second this. The S is a very cool, great-looking vehicle, but the Y is honestly just far superior.
@camoPirate_xXx@SawyerMerritt Pacific Ocean is a great place for Starlink and a terrible place for Fiber - thus the "where it is available" in my comment.
Fios is extremely reliable, but my comment is more generally speaking, from a theoretical standpoint. Wired is always going to be superior.
Like you mentioned, there are going to be service providers that have issues of their own, but that is outside of the scope of the general topic of wired versus wireless.
Regarding the speed of light being faster in a vacuum, that is irrelevant for client terminals. They do not work optically; they work through RF, which is susceptible to interference, attenuation, etc.
The laser links are specifically for inter-constellation connection. It has nothing to do with client connectivity.
@365_Solved@QEDvinci@SawyerMerritt I work with critical broadcast transmission in a professional setting. We would never choose wireless because it has better signal integrity - it does not. There are other advantages to wireless, but reliability and signal integrity are not on that list.
@sphigel1@QEDvinci@SawyerMerritt That site not being suitable for fiber is a huge assumption to make based on that photo.
Atarlink still doesn't have the upload speeds or low cost of fiber. That could change, but it isn't the case currently.
@Exogynous@SawyerMerritt Having both with fail-over or bonding is the best. I have 3 separate fiber services all with 3 years of 100% up time. Starlink is around 99% UT. What provider do you have for fiber?