mongoose

[Josephine Ridad @JosephineRidad]

My Tesla prevented an accident . Before my brain could process what was happening my car stopped abruptly and resumed running after the dashing boy cleared the path.I couldn’t have prevented this on my own and the aftermath is tragic and unimaginable. Thank you Elon.

[Diego Angulo @AmoaHamlet]

Durante mi militancia en el marxismo asistí a muchísimas charlas. Y con el tiempo empecé a notar un patrón muy interesante:

Podíamos pasar diez horas hablando de cómo tomar el poder.

Diez horas hablando de revolución, de estrategia, de organización, de activismo, de cómo derrotar al enemigo de clase, de cómo transformar las relaciones de poder.

Pero había una pregunta que nunca aparecía:

¿Y después qué?

Es decir:

¿Cómo vamos a crear riqueza?

¿Cómo vamos a organizar los incentivos?

¿Cómo vamos a asignar recursos escasos?

Silencio.

Y fue ahí cuando lo entendí.

El marxismo tiene una obsesión patológica con conquistar el poder y una pobreza extraordinaria de respuestas sobre cómo utilizarlo para construir una sociedad funcional.

La revolución está perfectamente descrita.

La sociedad posterior, en absoluta oscuridad.

Porque decir que algún día llegará una sociedad sin explotación, sin clases y sin contradicciones es muy fácil.

Lo difícil es explicar cómo llegas hasta ahí sin destruir en el camino los mecanismos que permiten a una sociedad producir y prosperar.

Y cuanto más preguntaba, más evidente se volvía.

El marxista podía explicarte durante horas quién tenía la culpa.

Pero cuando preguntabas cómo funcionaría concretamente esa nueva sociedad, las respuestas se hacían más oscuras.

Y quizá por eso, cuando intentaba ahondar en estos temas, la conversación siempre volvía al mismo lugar: cómo tomar el poder. No pasaban de eso.

Por eso hoy, cuando escucho a alguien hablar durante horas sobre la explotación, destruir el sistema y construir una sociedad nueva, mi primera pregunta es:

¿Cómo vas a hacerla funcionar?

Nunca verás a un marxista responderte esto porque literalmente no puede, no sabe.

Entonces deduce que, al igual que como con cualquier otra estafa piramidal, cuando hagas preguntas directas y concretas al marxismo, este intentará evitar en todo momento darte respuestas claras.

Nunca lo olvides.

[Naval @naval]

The left is on a project to enforce equality, despite biology and markets.

The goal of equality gives claim to the moral high ground, but contradicting biology and markets requires censorship and violence, which makes the whole project immoral.

[Handre @Handre]

Rome handed out free grain to 40,000 citizens in 73 BC. By 46 BC, Julius Caesar found 320,000 people lining up for their monthly ration. That eight-fold expansion happened in under three decades, and it shows you how welfare states actually grow.

No Roman senator stood up and announced a plan to addict a third of the city to government bread. It happened incrementally, through political competition. Each magistrate who wanted votes expanded eligibility. Each expansion normalized the next one. The citizen who once considered the dole shameful eventually expected it, then demanded it, then organized politically to protect it.

This is the core mechanism free market thinkers have identified across every era: once you create a transfer program, you create a constituency for that program. Recipients vote. Administrators build careers. Grain merchants who supply the state develop a stake in keeping the contracts flowing. The political economy locks in.

Caesar, to his credit, actually cut the rolls back to 150,000 through verification audits. It was one of his more economically coherent moves, though the Senate still murdered him. His successors quietly let the numbers climb again.

What did the dole require? Massive grain imports from Sicily, Sardinia, and Egypt, organized through state logistics at state expense, funded by taxation and conquest. When the conquest revenue dried up, the obligation remained. Rome had written a check against future military success, and future military success eventually failed to arrive.

The lesson is not complicated. Distribute a benefit and you distribute dependency. Distribute dependency and you distribute political power to whoever controls the distribution. The grain dole didn't weaken Rome overnight, but it made every subsequent reform politically impossible.

[Devon Eriksen @Devon_Eriksen_]

It's useless to warn people about something if no one can have a conversation about why it's happening and what must be done to stop it.

And that conversation is something that the tech elite are totally unprepared to have, because the solution will hit them directly in the pocketbook.

I can tell you how to fix the fertility crisis in three words.

But I can't actually fix the fertility crisis with those words, because y'all are not ready to do what's necessary. You think you are, but you're not. And you'll understand why I say you're not when I tell you the three words:

Stop. Hiring. Women.

Now do you get it?

A moment ago, you thought you were willing to do anything to fix this existential threat to every part of the world that matters.

Now, you want to ask me if there isn't, possibly, some gentler way that doesn't involve any nasty shocks to our nice, peaceful, tolerant, inclusive liberal way of life.

Or you're just calling me a big meanie.

Doesn't matter. When you argue with the point I am making here, you are arguing with Mother Nature, and I promise that Mother Nature cannot hear you, and she does not care.

Women already have a job, a job they evolved for. A job that is so demanding that they have to 100% specialized for it.

Women's job is making humans.

And there's only 15 years between the age when it's a felony to make a human with them, and the age when the stuff they need to make humans starts to not work so well.

If they are filling the role of men during that time period, they cannot do their own full-time, maximum effort job, and you get no new humans.

This is precisely why Mother Nature designed women to only mate with men who are wealthier and more powerful than they are. Because a woman, who is working full time at making humans, needs to be supported.

A baby human is an investment in the future. You can't make investments in the future without someone else supporting you in the present.

If men cannot do this, women won't have babies with those men.

This is why every single high-tech civilization has the fertility crisis.

Because every time a civilization gets high-tech, the elites, who buy labor, have a bright idea. Let's start educating the women, they say. That way, we can hire them and double the supply of labor. Which is totally good for society, and the fact that we, personally, will benefit most from this is a total coincidence, and not in any way the whole reason that Wall Street loves feminism.

Everyone knows that there's a near-perfect correlation between female education and the fertility crisis.

But very few people have truly understood why. It's not the education. It's what the women are being educated for.

If you just wanted to teach them matters animal, vegetable, and mineral, along with many cheerful facts about the square of the hypotenuse, there would be no problem at all.

But women are not being educated so they can be interesting conversationalists, or well-rounded human beings. They are being educated so they can sit in a cubicle eight hours a day between the ages of 20 and 35, and answer emails or design marketing campaigns.

That leaves them neither the time nor the resources nor the inclination to make humans, because men aren't any more powerful than they are. Which gives them the ick.

And, of course, they're miserable, because they are genetically programmed to be happy when they do their real job, which is making and refining little humans. Not emails or spreadsheets or marketing campaigns.

But no one is ready for this conversation, because it would involve admitting that every change in Western values after WW2 was a huge mistake.

@elonmusk isn't going to stop hiring women. Hell, it's not even legal to stop hiring women. You can get sued into oblivion for that.

But woman can't make little humans unless the other responsibilities of life are somebody else's problem.

And she doesn't want to make little humans with any man who cannot shield her from all those extra duties.

The bar for being able to do that used to be "reasonably successful tradesman". Now it's actual serious wealth.

We can't IVF our way out of this problem. And we can't just sit around posting "have more babies" on twitter. We have to address the real obstacles that prevent women from having kids.

And the biggest of those is that we have, in effect, demanded that they share every single adult male responsibility from career-building to voting to military service.

All of these responsibilities and burdens were sold to women as opportunities. But nothing is an opportunity if you can't opt out. Just try being 18 years old and finding a man who will 100 percent support and take care of you while you bear his children and do a little light housework.

It's possible, but you had better be exceptionally beautiful, with a sunny personality to match, and social access to the right set of men.

Because the average man can't offer you that deal anymore.

Not won't. Can't.

And there aren't enough rich men to go around.

[Bojan Tunguz @tunguz]

Datacenter ban would do for America what nuclear plant ban did for Germany.

[mongoose @Mongoose1827]

@ItIsHoeMath Hang in there. I personally really value your work and have learned a lot from you. You are having an impact. Keep doing it, if you can, but ultimately do what’s right for you. Thanks for everything you’ve done already🙏

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

This just broke my brain

Writer: Ian

[The Rabbit Hole @TheRabbitHole]

George Floyd’s death was used as an excuse for over 500 riots and to spread a false narrative of police-on-black brutality.

[Jack Posobiec @JackPosobiec]

BREAKING: GiveSendGo launched for New Chauvin Legal Appeal to Overturn Conviction

https://t.co/5PLao9UQ8H

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Derek Chauvin was unjustly convicted of murder, therefore he should be freed.

The facts show that he was not the cause of death, nor did he at any time intend for a death to occur. Whatever else he may be, he is not a murderer.

That is the truth.

[Skscartoon @skscartoon]

Derek Chauvin was not convicted on the evidence. He was convicted out of fear of riots and sacrificed to appease the left-wing mob that was looking for trouble during the height of the COVID

His imprisonment remains one of the most shameful injustices in history, a wrong that still awaits correction

[Tesla @Tesla]

Show us the wildest accident FSD Supervised has helped you avoid

Just reply with your video below

[Joel Pollak @joelpollak]

3 questions for @elonmusk about @ScottAdamsSays: Scott was always flattered when you would comment on his posts on @X. How closely did you follow his work, and did you tune in for the daily live streams and the "simultaneous sip"? (1/3)

[TeslaZoa @TeslaZoa]

Tesla FSD reportedly avoided a crash by moving onto the shoulder just before impact.

According to the driver’s frame-by-frame analysis, FSD began reacting about 0.17 seconds before the at-fault vehicle started moving toward the Tesla.

The other vehicle ultimately crashed into two cars, while the Tesla sustained no damage. No injuries were reported.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Écoute Matthieu.

Tu dis que qualifier Hitler de socialiste, c’est du révisionnisme.

Pourtant le programme du NSDAP de 1920 (points 11 à 17), Mein Kampf, ses discours et ses conversations privées disent exactement le contraire : destruction du capitalisme financier, nationalisation, contrôle total de l’économie « au nom du peuple », priorité absolue de la collectivité sur l’individu.

Ce n’est pas une invention de 2026. C’est écrit noir sur blanc.

Que des industriels aient mis de l’argent en 1933 ne change rien à la structure.
C’est exactement le même argument que ceux qui disent que les partis socialistes ou communistes n’étaient plus de gauche parce que des capitalistes les ont financés à certains moments. Ridicule.

Sur les « privatisations » : oui, ils ont parfois transféré des titres. Sous un contrôle étatique si total que la propriété n’était plus qu’un mot. Mises l’avait déjà décrit à l’époque : les entrepreneurs devenaient des *Betriebsführer*, des gestionnaires qui exécutaient les ordres de l’État sur les prix, les quantités, les salaires et les matières premières.
C’est du socialisme de fait. Pas du capitalisme.

Et maintenant regardons tes contradictions.

La gauche actuelle défend :
- le contrôle de l’économie par l’État
- la planification
- la priorité du collectif sur l’individu
- la lutte contre « le capitalisme financier »
- le grand récit des victimes et des oppresseurs

Exactement les outils que Hitler a utilisés.
La seule différence, c’est le critère de sélection des victimes et des ennemis.
Lui, c’était la race. Vous, c’est la classe, le genre, la race inversée, le climat…
Le logiciel reste le même : collectivisme + contrôle + boucs émissaires.

Tu peins Hitler en « extrême droite » pour laver les mains du socialisme de tout ce qu’il a produit au XXe siècle.
C’est pratique. Mais c’est intellectuellement malhonnête.

Le vrai clivage n’a jamais été gauche/droite.
C’est collectivisme contre liberté. Contrôle contre responsabilité.

Le national-socialisme était une variante de socialisme.
Et ceux qui refusent de le voir aujourd’hui le font pour protéger le mot « socialisme », pas pour honorer la mémoire des morts.

Ça suffit.

[mongoose @Mongoose1827]

How can it be otherwise?

[Polymarket @Polymarket]

JUST IN: Elon Musk declares >99.99% of AI computing will eventually move to space.

[mongoose @Mongoose1827]

@alpaysh That which can exist outside of space-time.

[mongoose @Mongoose1827]

@elonmusk Popularity Produces Product

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Hot staging