@worldranking_ The laws say properties purchased by one party before marriage cannot be claimed by the other party. It has nothing to do with gender specific. Don’t spread misinformation please.
@XenniallTeach@RealPostFolder We only know the financial disparity between both sides. We don’t know if there exists age disparity, if the guy had marriage history before,whether the lady is above the guy’s matching range excluding his financial resources. I am not hinting anything but a lot of factors matter
@XenniallTeach@RealPostFolder Well using family members as proxy for holding assets can be extreme way. Prenup is another way. The guy is a lawyer so he may think prenup has weaknesses. Not arguing he handles it decently. But marriage is more about heir, assets on the first day which is created.
@XenniallTeach@RealPostFolder I respect old school values. But it really depends. They have different levels of income and wealth. There always can be some kind of pre marriage arrangement. She should have the mindset that marrying a rich man is different from marrying a guy with nothing to lose.
@XenniallTeach@RealPostFolder I didn’t see she complained about lying from the context. She assumed it’s a shared pool arrangement but obviously he didn’t. She found out and he admitted. She didn’t like it. She didn’t say her fiancé was trying to lie to her. Just different values.
@XenniallTeach@RealPostFolder End of engagement should be a good choice for both sides. Planning ahead is nothing wrong given high divorce rate. Wanting her fair cut after divorce is also nothing wrong. They just need to find people who can accept their own arrangements or just not getting married.