@FTFonFS1@kevinwildes Personally I don't like the term "gentleman's sweep". It diminishes how hard it is to get a sweep. To go 4-0 and not let the other team win even 1 game is crazy and we should celebrate it. 4-1 is a pounding but you let them get a game. Don't call it a sweep.
@LastEpoch I totally understand why you guys did this and I think it was the right call. But I am very upset you had to do this at all. Very low blow by GGG.
@DarthMicroT How about a unique the causes damage over time to "pop" all at the end of the duration? Could create builds that focus around reducing the duration of dots where you're getting almost instantaneous damage from dots.
@FTFonFS1@getnickwright I feel like we need to pump the breaks a little bit. He's awesome no doubt. But I wouldn't put him above Steph or Shaq. Shaq led a three-peat. Steph changed the game. Talk about one man offense, Steph on and off the ball is the offense! Jokic can get in the room, but not yet.
@Fleks27 I think on the whole they look great. Even the ones that don't look great are broken in fixable ways. There doesn't seem to be a huge system problem like with covenants or azerite power. W for me.
@TaliesinEvitel For me it's PoE. But that's just because it has more of what I like. Way more depth. Way more customization. Just way more to do. I think it's personal preference though.
@Fleks27 Really good. I think quick small patches with outdoor content and cosmetics is perfect. The longer big patches allows for progression on hard content and alts. Feels just right to me.
@TaliesinEvitel This looks awesome! Only concern is what the total time between major patches will be. If that first major patch doesn't arrive until June that will be sad.
@JeffAHamilton I totally agree in single player games. I do see the value if level scaling in mmos because it let's new players play with their friends. If I'm way higher level then my buddy, I'll never play with them without level scaling. But agree otherwise.