Colin Hill

[Colin Hill @MrColinHill]

@Babygravy9 A film was made about Chagnon and the Yanomami; it's called Secrets Of The Tribe and it is well worth a watch

[Colin Hill @MrColinHill]

@all_things_cass @bindelj She's not saying M.E isn't a real condition, rather that some women (wombyn?) she met falsely claimed to have M.E

[Stephen R. C. Hicks @SRCHicks]

Let us strive to elevate our locutionary acts.

[Mary Harrington @moveincircles]

The subset of British citizens for whom the imagined ingroup is “everyone” is shrinking ike an ice cube in boiling water

[Colin Hill @MrColinHill]

@AmiriKing Man in the state of nature; a war of all against all where life is nasty, brutal and short

[British Patriot🇬🇧 @BritPatriot1805]

An edit of the Greatest Nation in the History of Mankind. A British Empire Edit by me.

Took 7 hours to make. This is my 2nd ever edit.

Also, Patriots should vote @RestoreBritain_

[Mary Harrington @moveincircles]

Thinking again about King Edmund, who gave horses and money to the Great Heathen Army in 865AD on a promise that they’d leave peacefully and bother someone else

So they did, then came back again later and killed him

Good thing we’d not make a mistake like that nowadays

[RAW EGG NATIONALIST @Babygravy9]

British people are truly the most evil people in history. They are Thanos. Britain is Thanos. They owe 43 trillion to India.

[Tom Harwood @tomhfh]

“Until August 1914 a sensible, law-abiding Englishman could pass through life and hardly notice the existence of the state, beyond the post office and the policeman. He could live where he liked and as he liked. He had no official number or identity card.

He could travel abroad or leave his country for ever without a passport or any sort of official permission. He could exchange his money for any other currency without restriction or limit.

He could buy goods from any country in the world on the same terms as he bought goods at home. For that matter, a foreigner could spend his life in this country without permit and without informing the police.

Unlike the countries of the European continent, the state did not require its citizens to perform military service. An Englishman could enlist, if he chose, in the regular army, the navy, or the territorials. He could also ignore, if he chose, the demands of national defence.

Substantial householders were occasionally called on for jury service. Otherwise, only those helped the state, who wished to do so. The Englishman paid taxes on a modest scale: nearly £200 million in 1913-14, or rather less than 8 per cent of the national income.

The state intervened to prevent the citizen from eating adulterated food or contracting certain infectious diseases. It imposed safety rules in factories, and prevented women, and adult males in some industries, from working excessive hours.

The state saw to it that children received education up to the age of 13. Since 1 January 1909, it provided a meagre pension for the needy over the age of 70. Since 1911, it helped to insure certain classes of workers against sickness and unemployment.

This tendency towards more state action was increasing. Expenditure on the social services had roughly doubled since the Liberals took office in 1905. Still, broadly speaking, the state acted only to help those who could not help themselves. It left the adult citizen alone.”

A. J. P. Taylor’s English History, 1914-1945.

With thanks to the @iealondon newsletter for highlighting this in yesterday's email.

[Colin Hill @MrColinHill]

@RFenell @DominicFrisby Yes, yes and yes. Also stop ALL funding of NGO's, think tanks and "charities".

[David Betz @DavidBe31099196]

It is pointless trying to understand the contemporary British media complex as ‘media’ in the conventional sense—journalism, reporting, or even opinion. The correct frame is propaganda: mood and sentiment management, with its sharpest tool today being crisis communications.

The dominant technique, visible daily if you still watch, is inversion—systematic reversal. It flips reality: victim into perpetrator, aggressor into defender, truth into falsehood, good into evil. It constructs Walter Lippmann’s ‘pseudo-environment’, an alternate reality in which the public is meant to dwell.

A key subtype is projection, or ‘accusation in a mirror’, neatly summarised by a Rwandan Hutu propagandist in a 1990s manual: impute to your enemies exactly what you and your own side are planning or doing.

When a genuine crisis erupts—such as the racially aggravated murder of Henry Nowak—the first imperative of the machine is to stall, dampen, and defeat the natural eruption of public outrage.

Call it ‘restoring calm’ if you like the euphemism. In practice, it means herding people back into anaesthetised normality so that inversion can resume.

Once the majority has been shamed, distracted, or bullied into silence, the remnant still angry can be ridiculed by the usual chorus—eye-rolling panellists on Have I Got News for You, columnists sneering at those ‘harping on’, and accusations of crypto-racism or worse.

Thus, the brutal stabbing of an unarmed 18-year-old student, the false cry of racism by his killer, and the police reportedly handcuffing the dying boy as he bled out on a Southampton street is repackaged as another ‘knife crime’ tragedy (note Shaban Mahmood’s flaccid parliamentary statement this afternoon)—preferably illustrated with a generic white face in the style of the BBC's so-called reality-based drama 'Adolescence' or the more recent but equally putridly manipulative 'The Capture'.

Real patterns (grooming gangs, crime disparities, two-tier policing) are airbrushed. This is projection at work: the actual sources of predation and institutional failure are recast, while legitimate grievance is pathologized.

The truth? The system enabled both the attack and the immediate inversion of its aftermath and that stands exposed to anyone with eyes and functioning brain by the video evidence. That’s the problem, your own 'lying eyes', that crisis communications has to handle before there can be a return to normal levels of public mood management can be restored.

This is precisely what Dan Hodges is performing when he labels people demanding we talk about the murder ‘scum’ for refusing to respect the family’s wish that their son’s death not be politicised. It is phase-one grunt work in the inversion protocol: shame the angry back into silence so the pseudo-environment can be restored.

Smart enough to know his role, malleable enough to perform it willingly—exactly as Noam Chomsky described the filtering process that keeps the right sort of voice prominent in the system.

The technique still works on some. But it is wearing thin. Every overplayed inversion, every *scummy* dismissal of raw public grief, prepares the ground for sharper identities and clearer grievances against the system itself. Normal people do not remain moderate forever when the machine insists their reality is the problem.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Sod it. For the purposes of full transparency, here are our canvassing returns from Makerfield that we’ve had back so far from the door knocking today.

1,010 sample size.

24.6% for Restore Britain.

31.2% definitely against.

24.2% undecided.

20% considering.

Excluding won’t votes.

More teams coming back, so the sample size will grow a lot in the next few hours.

Largely agrees with what we’ve found over the last week - astounding response with the working class, more difficult with wealthier areas. To be honest.

Labour are the opponent in the fancier places, Reform with the working class.

Our campaign has just taken off. Great name recognition already, but clearly room to grow.

Let’s see what happens.

But we’re very happy with progress.

[Freddie Sayers @freddiesayers]

If you think the world is divided between the good guys and the bad guys, and that you’re one of the good guys — then you’re one of the bad guys.

[Colin Hill @MrColinHill]

@The_Kyle_Mann This quote is pure gold

[Eleanor (Ellie) Rofe @eleanorrofe]

Multiculturalism has nothing to do with race. That would be easy.

The clue is in the name. It's about culture. Which is why it's a bust.

It's not just some middle-class twonk eating Thai food while twerking to bangra and feeling self-congratulatory about how 'multicultural' they are.

Culture is *everything*. All our beliefs. Clashing, foundational beliefs.

And at its most extreme, this clash means that some people, from some cultures, think that raping young, non-Muslim girls is OK. So OK they can randomly call 10 mates and they'll all pop over to violate and torture a 12-year old.

The working class are at the coalface of your luxury beliefs.

You need to start thinking seriously about mass migration and what clashes it's creating, not just mouthing endless platitudes and expecting the working class to take all the hits.

[Colin Hill @MrColinHill]

@theoliveranwar Usain Bolt perhaps?

[Colin Hill @MrColinHill]

@gunsnrosesgirl3 Gone With The Wind

[Colin Hill @MrColinHill]

@OliLondonTV How much luv??

[Colin Hill @MrColinHill]

@ianmiles Instant karma