@AJ__B5@ByMikeBaker to be quite blunt, if someone's gonna stop opposing the police state just because a different protestor opposing the police state used some more militant tactics they disagree with, then they weren't serious about opposing it in the first place and their "support" is irrelevant.
@SRQPhotoman@ByMikeBaker to be fair they're gonna be depicted as violent no matter what they do. If someone's gonna stop opposing the police state just because somebody else opposing the police state did something they disagree with they weren't serious about it and their "support" doesn't really matter
@HelenaNalis @chriscaltz@bbcrb@BristolCouncil@ASPolice haven't you heard? property over people - damaging property is considered more violent than damaging a person at this point.
@keypointist @OCzukay@BorisJohnson@MomentumBristol his company was responsible for transporting over 100,000 slaves. It really doesn't matter how much "good" he did with his slave profits. The ends don't justify the means.
@MikeFreedom10 @richkav @BenHanson1989@sean_antrim@BorisJohnson so if murder and enslave you and everyone around you that's totally acceptable as long as I use the profit I make for a "good cause"? And what's with the scare quotes around "slavery"? It's not in dispute.