Teacher of Computer Science.
Certified Raspberry Pi Educator, maker, mad scientist and HAB enthusiast.
Views are my own, and come with references on request!
@zudans@engineers_feed 840 is not possible. Line 1 clearly states one number is correct, and in the right place. With 840, the 4 would be in the wrong place so is invalid.
@DrJMMHall@engineers_feed There appears to be an anomaly in your diagram. The opposite side of the triangle is 30, so the smaller triangle should have a hypotenuse of 20 (30-10), not 10.
@engineers_feed There isn't enough data to conclusively solve the problem.
Assuming
* outer shape is square
* major triangle can be rotated to create 3 additional overlapping triangles
Major triangle is 600sq
Minor triangle is 95.84
600+(600-95.84)+600-(92.94x2)=2016.64
(50x50)-2016.64=483.36sq
@Sandford_Police Always check the information before you comment. I'd like to draw everyone's attention to this tweet of the Sandford Police Farce: https://t.co/IjupGmV0SG
I any eveny, neither party are driving a Volvo, so they're both wrong 👌
There is a lot of misinformation out there on the internet.
DC Mike Hunt advises “Please do your research, look at bios/profiles, verify information & don’t just blindly think what you’re reading is true”
Together we can beat the scammers & those intent on misleading others!
@clcsimon Similarly, I have a Shorthand If Else version, but again I don't think that could be legitimately described as being a solution because of the nature of the syntax. But, I suppose it is valid code 🤷♂️https://t.co/czYAZmCQP8
@clcsimon I thought that 5 lines was the smallest it could be, legitimately. Before the 3 liner I cobbled a 4 line solution, but it was a bit of a cheat as in my opinion as it used a one line if statement. https://t.co/9R8dnwlJxh
Remember the honeycomb in Weebly Coding Golf (@clcsimon) @jonwitts? I've just reduced that 5 line solution to 3 lines (not including import turtle)!
I'm pretty sure it's not as elegant as it could be... work in progress etc..! https://t.co/DIS2wc3joc