@elseano85@Thegrin44677936@FAmmiranteTFJ@5thQGinger Yes, but it is the same as americans saying that NBA champions are world champions.
European and SA countries were obviously the best at the time, but didn't even give other countries the chance to play. It was SA vs Europe, not world cups.
@GhostSignal880@FAmmiranteTFJ Being a loser isn't some sitcom thing, it is a factual definition, if you lose a tournament, you are a loser.
I am not saying it to be mean.
Croatia doesn't have any trophy, like most countries in football, therefore they don't have "a record in the history books".
@GhostSignal880@FAmmiranteTFJ You are coping, desperately trying to make of Croatia a relevant football country but it isn't, that's it.
Take pride in having loser consolation prizes if you want, I am simply stating how other people see it from outside.
Nobody cares about losers in world cup.
@GhostSignal880@FAmmiranteTFJ Nope, they didn't, they haven't won a single world cup.
You can cope and say they are high among the other losers, that's fair, definitely not winners though.
@GhostSignal880@FAmmiranteTFJ Bro you are spewing nonsense right now, I didn't say that Modric was not a successful player.
Only 8 countries have won the world cup, Croatia didn't, simple as that.
@GhostSignal880@FAmmiranteTFJ Croatia didn't win anything. World cup medals are worthless, nobody cares about them but those who have it. Ask your players, do you think someone like Modric takes pride in having a silver medal ?
Also yes, most nations didn't achieve anything in football.
@GhostSignal880@FAmmiranteTFJ Stats like that only matter for losers. Nobody cares about who reach a final a thousand times, if they didn't even win it.
@GhostSignal880@FAmmiranteTFJ 2018 was one of the most deserved wins for France and I say that as a belgian.
They may have played dirty against us but they still defeated Argentina, Uruguay and Belgium to reach the final, while Croatia struggled vs Denmark then Russia, and defeated a weak England.
@elseano85@Thegrin44677936@FAmmiranteTFJ@5thQGinger Most shouldn't, like Uruguay having 2 stars for winning in 1930 (13 teams only) and 1950 (Europe was in ruins basically) doesn't compare to a world cup won in the last 30 years.
1966 was a mess (England cheating against Argentina) and the WC that followed had stricter rules.
@thfcbulldog@FAmmiranteTFJ It is also important to consider the lucky path they were given to reach the final.
Their only tough opponent and big win was against Argentina at a weak time of their WC history.
Outside of them, they faced Nigeria, Iceland, Denmark, Russia and a weak England.
@bored_cleo@BAT_MAK@DigitalGanon Donc selon toi, leur reportage qui utilise des images qui datent d'il y a deux ans ร peu prรจs jusqu'ร ajd sont toutes de l'acting ? Leurs multiples rรฉus filmรฉes, rdv chez le producteur, chez le photographe alim, avec les graphistes, sont fakes ? Vous en devenez ridicules.
@QuietKid611@FIFAWorldCup Brazil has not beaten France in WC since 1958.
They lost four times in row, if we include the Confederations Cup semi finals in 2001.