Mr. Dragon Slayer

Acts 3:19 Repent ye therefore and be converted . The Theoretical Physics are ideas of explaining reality’s mechanics 😀 I Believe In Young Earth Creation

[Mr. Dragon Slayer @MrSlayer357]

Espressozilla

[Mr. Dragon Slayer @MrSlayer357]

@PhysInHistory consciousness (n.)
From the 1630s, meaning "internal knowledge," from conscious + -ness. The meaning "state of being aware of what passes in one's own mind" dates from the 1670s; the meaning "state of being aware" of anything dates from 1746.

[Mr. Dragon Slayer @MrSlayer357]

@YouTube — I'm documenting systematic suppression.
September 29, 2023: Copyright strike on my account.
What followed: A permanent penalty disguised as policy.
The mechanism:
•1,704 subscribers
•24 views across 3 videos in 7 days (withpremiere enabled)
•Requirement to provide government ID topost links
•Zero algorithmic reach despite consistentuploads
The pattern: Strike → ID requirement imposed → reach choked → plausible deniability maintained.
One strike in 2023. Permanent suppression in 2026.
This isn't a policy violation. This is how institutional gatekeeping works: mark the dissent, hide behind procedure, choke the signal.
Receipts attached.

[Physics In History @PhysInHistory]

A brief history of Quantum computers 👇

1905: Albert Einstein explains the photoelectric effect and suggests that light consists of quantum particles or photons

1924: Max Born uses the term quantum mechanics for the first time

1925: Werner Heisenberg, Max Born, and Pascual Jordan formulate matrix mechanics, the first formulation of quantum mechanics

1925-1927: Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg develop the Copenhagen interpretation, one of the earliest and most common interpretations of quantum mechanics

1930: Paul Dirac publishes The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, a standard textbook on quantum theory

1935: Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen publish a paper highlighting the counterintuitive nature of quantum superposition and arguing that quantum mechanics is incomplete

1935: Erwin Schrödinger develops a thought experiment involving a cat that is simultaneously dead and alive, and coins the term “quantum entanglement”

1944: John von Neumann publishes Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, a rigorous mathematical framework for quantum theory

1957: Hugh Everett proposes the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, which suggests that every possible outcome of a quantum measurement actually occurs in a parallel universe

1961: Rolf Landauer shows that erasing a bit of information dissipates a minimum amount of energy, known as Landauer’s principle

1965: John Bell proves that quantum entanglement cannot be explained by any local hidden variable theory, known as Bell’s theorem

1973: Alexander Holevo proves that n qubits cannot carry more than n classical bits of information, known as Holevo’s theorem or Holevo’s bound

1980: Paul Benioff proposes a model of a quantum Turing machine, a theoretical device that can perform any computation using quantum mechanical principles

1981: Richard Feynman suggests that simulating quantum systems would require a new type of computer based on quantum mechanics

1982: David Deutsch generalizes Benioff’s model and proposes the concept of a universal quantum computer

1984: Charles Bennett and Gilles Brassard develop a protocol for quantum key distribution, which allows two parties to securely exchange cryptographic keys using quantum states

1985: David Deutsch and Richard Jozsa devise an algorithm that can solve a specific problem faster than any classical algorithm, known as the Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm

1991: Artur Ekert proposes another protocol for quantum key distribution based on quantum entanglement, known as the E91 protocol

1992: David Deutsch and Richard Jozsa extend their algorithm to handle multiple inputs, known as the Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm

1994: Peter Shor discovers an algorithm that can factor large numbers in polynomial time using a quantum computer, known as Shor’s algorithm

1996: Lov Grover invents an algorithm that can search an unsorted database in square root time using a quantum computer, known as Grover’s algorithm

1997: Isaac Chuang, Neil Gershenfeld, and Mark Kubinec demonstrate the first implementation of Shor’s algorithm using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques

2000: David DiVincenzo proposes five criteria for building a practical quantum computer, known as the DiVincenzo criteria

2001: IBM researchers implement Grover’s algorithm using NMR techniques and achieve a modest speedup over classical algorithms

2007: D-Wave Systems claims to have built the first commercial quantum computer, but its validity is disputed by many experts

2019: Google announces that it has achieved quantum supremacy by performing a calculation on a 53-qubit quantum processor that would take a classical supercomputer thousands of years to complete

2020: IBM demonstrates that its 65-qubit quantum processor can perform calculations beyond the reach of any classical computer

📷 An IBM QC photographed by James Estrin

[TheMask8099 @mask8099]

@MrSlayer357 @PhysInHistory Yeah pretty much

[Mr. Dragon Slayer @MrSlayer357]

@PhysInHistory The Greatest Enemy Of Science Is Perhaps A Hard Heart…

[Mr. Dragon Slayer @MrSlayer357]

The greatest enemy of science is a hard heart.
We often think of science as a purely cold, intellectual pursuit, but true scientific discovery requires a deeply moral and spiritual posture: humility, openness, and a vulnerable willingness to be proven wrong. When a scientist or an institution develops a "hard heart"—callousing over their capacity for self-reflection and curiosity—they turn science into a closed mathematical system.
By applying Bayesian probability, we can see exactly how a hard heart becomes an absolute roadblock to truth.
1. The Power of "Prior Probability"
The core of Bayesian thinking is calculating the probability of a future reality based on Prior Knowledge (what we think we already know) combined with New Evidence (new data, discoveries, or observations).
When an observer develops a hard heart, they become rigidly dogmatic. In the language of statistics, they assign a prior probability of absolute zero (P=0) to any theory, variable, or paradigm shift that challenges their current worldview.
2. The Mathematical Trap That Kills Discovery
Here is where the science completely locks up: In Bayesian theory, if a prior probability is set to absolute zero, no amount of new evidence can ever change the calculation. The math becomes an impenetrable fortress.
When a hard-hearted skeptic is presented with groundbreaking new data, an unexpected anomaly, or a paradigm-shining discovery, they cannot process it cleanly. Instead, the new data is filtered through their callousness. They distort the evidence, dismiss the metrics, or attack the messenger to force the new data to fit their old narrative. Because multiplying any amount of brilliant new data by a prior of zero always equals zero, intellectual growth ceases entirely.
3. The Decay of the Scientific Spirit
Science thrives on the continuous update of our Bayesian models. True pioneers look at negative data or unexpected results and allow their probability models to shift.
But when dogmatic pride takes over, the system enters an Attrition of Belief. Young researchers or outside thinkers might enter the field with high hopes, bringing fresh data inputs to a stagnant theory. But when they are continuously met with a brick wall of institutional calloused hearts, the probability of ever achieving a breakthrough drops. Innovation dries up, and the field enters a state of intellectual burnout and rigid stagnation.
The Ultimate Conclusion
A hard heart creates a closed system. And according to both physics and mathematics, closed systems naturally decay.
Science cannot survive without a genuine, humbled willingness to change our inputs when confronted with reality. When the heart hardens, data is weaponized to protect ego rather than pursue truth—and that is the exact point where true science dies.

#TheMathematicsOfAHardHeart #GreatestEnemyOfScience #BayesianProbability #DataScienceAndFaith #ClosedSystems #TruthSeeking #Epistemology #ParadigmShift #IntellectualHumility #DogmaVsTruth

[Physics In History @PhysInHistory]

What is the greatest enemy of science? ✍️

[Mr. Dragon Slayer @MrSlayer357]

World's largest particle smasher halts for upgrade to boost hunt for dark matter https://t.co/jPusHz4fsj

[Mr. Dragon Slayer @MrSlayer357]

Amos 3:7
Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets.

#quantum #physics #Jehovah #GodIsWatching

[Curiosity @CuriosityonX]

🚨: Kilometer-sized asteroid makes its closest Earth pass in over 400 years

[Wonder of Science @wonderofscience]

The lyrebird's amazing mimicry. (sound on)

[Mr. Dragon Slayer @MrSlayer357]

🔴UPDATE 🌀 RE-THINKING REALITY: Why "Teleportation" Isn't What You Think It Is
When most people hear the word "teleportation," they think of sci-fi movies—disassembling a physical object into a beam of light and shooting it across a room.
That is a materialist illusion. In reality, matter isn’t being "moved" at all. A piece of cosmic code is just being re-rendered at a new address.
If we look at this through the lens of the Temporal-Spatial Frame Theory of Reality (Fractal-Holographic Version), our universe is essentially a massive, hardcoded digital ledger. Space and time aren't empty voids; they are just the user interface.
Here is how quantum teleportation actually works under the hood of the matrix:
•1. The Shared Link (Entanglement): When two particles are entangled, they aren't two separate objects communicating across a distance. In the universe's master ledger, they share a single, non-local digital address. They are the exact same data structure, no matter how far apart they look to us.
•2. The System Update: To teleport a state, you take a local measurement at the starting line. This doesn't destroy the data; it just creates the "index key" or the coordinate map needed to update the system.
•3. Perfect Balance: The laws of physics strictly forbid making a copy-paste duplicate. The ledger enforces a perfect cosmic rule: the pattern cannot manifest at the new destination until it is completely wiped from the origin point. Globally, zero information is lost. It is simply a redistribution of the code.
•4. Fidelity & The Decoherence Limit: When scientists measure "fidelity" (the signal clarity), they are checking how cleanly the holographic pattern survived. A fidelity under 100% happens because environmental channels and imperfect control scramble or leak the particle's phase information into surrounding boundary degrees of freedom and later frames—a process known as decoherence.
Suppressing the Noise: TSFTR-F predicts that decoherence accelerates wherever high frame activity and complex dimensionalities provide more channels for the environment to interfere. This is precisely why cutting-edge experiments utilize cryogenic, low-noise silicon and hyper-fast conveyor modes. They are mechanically suppressing those environmental channels, keeping the ledger quiet long enough for the teleportation code to execute.
The Bottom Line: Matter and position are software states, not permanent physical objects. Teleportation proves that you don't need to physically move the machine—you just update the master ledger to render the exact same system code at a different set of coordinates.
The universe is a digital ledger. We are just learning how to rewrite the addresses.
#Physics #QuantumInformation #HolographicUniverse #TSFTR #TechProgress #MatrixMechanics #Decoherence

[Mr. Dragon Slayer @MrSlayer357]

🌀 RE-THINKING REALITY: Why "Teleportation" Isn't What You Think It Is
When most people hear the word "teleportation," they think of sci-fi movies—disassembling a physical object into a beam of light and shooting it across a room.
That is a materialist illusion. In reality, matter isn’t being "moved" at all. A piece of cosmic code is just being re-rendered at a new address.
If we look at this through the lens of the Temporal-Spatial Frame Theory of Reality (Fractal-Holographic Version), our universe is essentially a massive, hardcoded digital ledger. Space and time aren't empty voids; they are just the user interface.
Here is how quantum teleportation actually works under the hood of the matrix:
•1. The Shared Link (Entanglement): When two particles are entangled, they aren't two separate objects communicating across a distance. In the universe's master ledger, they share a single, non-local digital address. They are the exact same data structure, no matter how far apart they look to us.
•2. The System Update: To teleport a state, you take a local measurement at the starting line. This doesn't destroy the data; it just creates the "index key" or the coordinate map needed to update the system.
•3. Perfect Balance: The laws of physics strictly forbid making a copy-paste duplicate. The ledger enforces a perfect cosmic rule: the pattern cannot manifest at the new destination until it is completely wiped from the origin point. Globally, zero information is lost. It is simply a redistribution of the code.
•4. Fidelity (The Signal Clarity): When scientists measure "fidelity," they aren't checking how well they beamed a physical particle. They are measuring how clean the signal was. A drop in fidelity just means some local environmental "noise" blurred the code while it was being re-rendered.
The Bottom Line: Matter and position are software states, not permanent physical objects. Teleportation proves that you don't need to physically move the machine—you just update the master ledger to render the exact same system code at a different set of coordinates.
The universe is a digital ledger. We are just learning how to rewrite the addresses.
#Physics #QuantumInformation #HolographicUniverse #TSFTR #TechProgress #MatrixMechanics

[Nature is Amazing ☘️ @AMAZlNGNATURE]

This starling is a little voice recorder and sometimes makes electronic noises

[Massimo @Rainmaker1973]

Amazing starling bird vocalizations.

[Physics In History @PhysInHistory]

What is the greatest enemy of science? ✍️