Pete 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

Ownlife.

[Pete 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Mr_Pew]

@NVIDIAGeForceUK @007GameIOI #007FirstLightRTX

[𝐍𝐢𝐨𝐡 𝐁𝐞𝐫𝐠 🇮🇷 ✡︎ @NiohBerg]

Dear @elonmusk,

Please make a change to X so that grey checkmark government accounts aren't allowed to close their replies.

Sadiq Khan should NOT be allowed to close his comments like a coward while being an elected official.

🙏🏻

[Pete 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Mr_Pew]

@D_Tarczynski Good.

[Scott - Reform UK 🩵🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Xplo_onyX]

This cunt is done, game over you Peado protecting wanker.

[Pete 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Mr_Pew]

@storchyowl @swfc I can only imagine how incredible that must have felt — seeing all those supporters showing such genuine admiration and pride, knowing you were the one who stepped in to save the club. What a moment!

[Restore Britain @RestoreBritain]

Restore Britain's Energy Philosophy.

Restore Britain’s forthcoming energy paper sets out the steps for ensuring cheap and abundant energy at home.

This project is three months in the making and consistent with our track record of producing well-researched, in-depth papers for the good British public to scrutinise.

As for our imminent energy policy document, we present a short teaser below...

At Restore Britain, we believe that energy is the lifeblood of any developed first-world economy. First and foremost, then, it should be cheap, reliable, and scalable.

If that means investment in fossil fuels, as right now it does, then so be it. Affordable energy makes nations rich and rich nations are better equipped than poor nations to tackle any environmental challenges.

Overall, energy should be valued as strategic national infrastructure, not treated as an environmental compliance problem. We also believe that it must serve our security needs. In the modern world, national sovereignty means nothing if it is not backed by energy independence.

The future we envision is one of self-confident nuclear expansion, full exploitation of our offshore oil and gas reserves, onshore shale development where feasible, and some limited role for renewables – albeit without subsidies, competing on their own merits – as part of a balanced grid mix.

These should meet our energy demands at a rate affordable to British households and British businesses.

On its own, though, this is not enough to make energy cheap, plentiful, and thus restore Britain to prosperity.

We will also need to embark upon a mass removal of our binding Net Zero commitments, the vast majority of which are smothering our economy to no worthwhile end. Even if we were to opt for a ‘full steam ahead’ strategy on oil, gas, and nuclear right away, energy prices would not come down unless we first took aim at the structural issues caused by the Net Zero cult.

We would repeal the lot.

The debate now raging about energy bills shows that the British people are struggling. Ultimately, though, what we need is more a long-term vision for national flourishing than eye-catching measures aimed at temporary relief.

The ability to build is also vital. A nation may possess a capable population, plentiful resources, and cutting-edge technological know-how, but if it cannot turn these inputs into power plants, transmission lines, factories, housing, ports, railways, and data centres, then that nation’s economic potential remains unrealised. Our practical approach proceeds from two major principles.

First, strategic infrastructure must be treated as a matter of national capability rather than ordinary planning disputes. We would work to ensure that approval timelines are measured in months, not years.

Second, regulatory frameworks must be cut back and simplified. An alarming number of delays arise not from environmental or health and safety protection itself, but from overlapping layers of approval, consultation, and litigation that cause projects to stall for indefinite periods on end.

OIL & GAS

Unless we reverse course, Britain will soon be the only country in Europe with a windfall tax on oil and gas profits still in force, scaring off investment and undermining our energy needs. Instead, we would impose no more than the standard 25% corporation tax, not the effective 78% grabbed by the Treasury at present. Right now, the incentives around even the small amount of drilling that is permitted are extremely forbidding. In the year ending July 2024, the average rate of return for offshore operators stood at a pitiful net -1%.

Our aim, by contrast, is to foster a predictable environment that rewards risk-taking investors, creates proper jobs, and deepens valuable skill-pools. We intend to preserve Aberdeen in particular as a crucial node in the oil and gas sector. On current trends, the local economy of North East Scotland and the national economy of Britain as a whole is threatened by Ed Miliband’s lunatic, ideologically driven pursuit of Net Zero at all costs.

But we would also level with the British public. There are no overnight solutions to the way in which we have been so woefully misgoverned in recent decades, including on matters related to energy. We would not hesitate to build new coal-fired power plants as part of an interim strategy to transition to more reliable long-term sources. The major advantage of such plants is that, as well as being dispatchable, they can be up and running within a shorter timeframe (roughly three to four years) than new gas turbines. As both China and Germany have shown, modern techniques also make coal far less of a pollutant than it used to be. Last of all, there is plenty of it – particularly the cleanest and densest anthracite and bituminous varieties – across the British Isles.

NUCLEAR

We would turn our efforts, too, towards a nationwide nuclear renaissance, in particular building an extensive fleet of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). Cutting-edge SMR designs boast a range of virtues. They are powerful enough to meet the needs of a small- to medium-sized town, but nimble enough to do so without much notice. The Rolls-Royce SMRs, for instance, require an overall site footprint of fewer than 10 acres. Contrary to larger projects like Sizewell C and Hinkley Point C, they are also easier to finance privately and with minimal, if any, state funds.

The major problem for all nuclear power projects, however, remains burdensome overregulation. We shall therefore expand on the work of the regulatory taskforce already commissioned by the Labour government.

The brief of our taskforce would be to eliminate all forms of duplication across every level of our existing regulatory framework, from environmental impact assessments to planning hurdles. As part of an interim strategy between where we find ourselves today and the ultimate goal of simplifying our regulatory system along the lines of foreign success stories like France and South Korea, we would not hesitate to overrule the regulator by automatic repeal of any laws or regulations that it cites to block standardised designs safely in operation elsewhere in the developed world.

OFFSHORE WIND

Offshore wind turbines are remote enough to be non-despoiling to natural beauty, to require no land competition, and though intermittent by nature, can work hand in glove with natural gas as a more reliable substitute whenever the wind fails to blow. Our ultimate aim is to be energy independent, but since that cannot occur instantly and we are already committed to buy whatever our windfarms generate, we may as well make the most of it. Between now and where we aspire to take Britain, we are bound to find ourselves in a position where, while longer term forms of dispatchable power are built, we shall need some wind.

FRACKING

In the same way that lifting the ban on North Sea oil and gas exploration would be a priority under a Restore Britain government, so too would re-examining the opportunities presented by shale gas.

The obstacles in our case are state-imposed constraints on new well developments, a moratorium on fracking reimposed by Rishi Sunak in October 2022, and onerous taxes on oil and gas companies.

The irony is that fracking, though demonised for causing tremors, is far less seismically disruptive than the geothermal wells in Cornwall so often lauded by the very activists who despise shale exploration.

Once the ban is lifted, the regulations would be rewritten to establish a level playing field between the fracking sector and the geothermal sector, which for arbitrary, unjust, and counter-productive reasons is less burdened.

CAUSE FOR HOPE

We note with excitement the fact that Britain possesses substantial domestic energy resources and the technical capacity to develop them.

What has been lacking is the political will to prioritise cheap, abundant, and reliable energy over costly, ideologically driven climate targets. Removing the self-destructive Net Zero system, reforming planning and regulation to enable timely construction, and restoring a pragmatic balance between oil and gas, nuclear, hydrocarbons, and unsubsidised renewables would allow markets and private investment to deliver the abundance required for affordable energy and national restoration.

Victorian Britain relied on cheap power and clean water to drive the Industrial Revolution. Nothing fundamental has changed. We have an abundance of both. A self-confident drive for increased energy production at home would boost government revenue from corporation and employment taxes, while reducing our exposure to global shocks and our reliance on foreign imports.

Restoring Britain’s energy security will not be without transitional challenges, but the alternative is continued adherence to policies that have produced some of Europe’s highest energy prices. A patriotic energy policy must place the interests of the British people first.

Our full paper will be published very soon indeed.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

My honest opinion on Keir Starmer.

[Pete 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Mr_Pew]

@RestoreBritain_ Ready 🫡

[A View From Yorkshire @models_by_Russ]

Funny how this country picks and chooses who it protects.

On one side, you’ve got men from the Special Air Service—the tip of the spear—walking away because they feel like they’ve got a target on their backs. Not from the enemy… from their own side.

Sent into chaos, told to get the job done. No headlines, no glory—just results.
Years later? Lawyers circling, investigations looming, and a government that suddenly can’t quite remember backing them.

Then look at veterans from Northern Ireland—dragged back through the mud decades on, while the people who sent them there sit comfortably out of reach.

But when failure happens here at home—think the Stockport massacre—what do we see?
Quiet resignations.
Full pensions.
No decades-long pursuit.

We’ll chase soldiers across half a century for decisions made in the fog of conflict…
But when leadership fails in plain sight, it’s a polite handshake and a send-off.

That’s not justice. That’s convenience.

And if you’re one of the lads watching all this unfold, why would you stay? Why would you risk everything knowing you might be the one left holding the bag years later?

We don’t have a recruitment problem.
We’ve got a loyalty problem.

No wonder the lads are getting out of the regiment—half the country hasn’t got a clue why they sleep soundly at night.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

An RAF cadet has been suspended from an officer training course after saying that Islam is the 'greatest threat to Britain'.

He was 'immediately removed' from the course and is under investigation.

A shocking decision.

Young men are entitled to their opinions. If he had said racism or the far-right, would he have been suspended as swiftly? I doubt it.

It is no secret that I have immense concerns around the creeping islamification of Britain, and the demographic changes facing our country.

Restore Britain is the only party willing to actually do anything about it.

If that young man wants my support, I urge him to get in touch.

[Pete 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Mr_Pew]

@Matt_Pinner Heat.

[Pete 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Mr_Pew]

@elonmusk This was the best flight i ever had..

[Pete 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Mr_Pew]

@atensnut Waiting for the never go full retard meme video to drop..

[Pete 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Mr_Pew]

@RupertLowe10 @wayotworld Glorious.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Will Restore ‘split’ the ‘vote’?

No vote belongs to any party. It is that arrogant attitude that led us into this mess. One man. One woman. One vote. That is how it works. Votes do not belong to political parties. It is YOUR vote.

I don’t believe that Brits should have to hold their nose and vote for the least worst option, however they may judge that. What a depressing and shitty way to run a democracy. I don’t want to get involved in that. I want to give people a political party that they can truly believe in.

If you want to campaign to get Nadhim Zahawi, Nadine Dorries and that random Bangladeshi bloke elected - then you can support Reform. If you want to rehash the same people that cocked up everything in the first place, then Jenrick and Braverman will be on the ballot paper for Reform. They have their track record, of importing millions. If you agree, you can support that.

Vaccine passports, mandates, lockdowns. All of it. If you passionately believe in that, there is a political party that is promoting the man behind it all. You have that choice. Zahawi is in Reform. You can support that party. It’s your choice. Up to you.

I am offering you a different choice. That isn’t splitting any vote, that is called democracy.

And I am entirely uninterested in conserving or reforming the status quo.

I want to tear the existing state apparatus apart, limb from limb. Dismantle it. Destroy it.

Britain doesn’t need reforming, or conserving.

Britain needs restoring. Boldly, fearlessly, unapologetically.

Restore Britain will not campaign to put the same people into Government who were responsible for the country’s downfall. We’re just not going to do that. I don’t believe it’s the moral course of action. Will we lack ‘Government experience’, because we’re putting forward people from outside politics?

Yes. GOOD. I wouldn’t want it any other way. If I want advice on how to import thousands and thousands of Afghans, I’ll ask Jenrick. Can’t see that happening, can you? If we want tips on creating millions of potential illegal migrants through endless foreign wars, I know who to ask.

There is a long time until the next election - Labour MPs will not vote for their own destruction.

Restore Britain is already polling well, and we have over 100,000 members.

We’re not even three weeks old as a political party - we have time to build and to grow. We are already doing exactly that, far more than is currently known publicly.

Thousands and thousands of people who have never even voted before have joined our party.

We are not splitting any vote. We are creating our own support, we are giving people a reason to believe in the political system again.

Competition is a positive thing, always. If other parties want to make their argument, they can do so. That is exactly what we are doing, and the British people are responding to it.

So look. The decision is entirely up to you.

All I have done is given you an alternative.

Restore Britain.

[Pete 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Mr_Pew]

@PatrickChristys Hes is such a weak man, how someone like him manages to get to be the leader of our country is beyond me.

He is such a disappointment, hopefully someone with a backbone gets in next time and can show some true leadership, something our country deserves..

[Pete 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Mr_Pew]

@Glinner Such a great series! really enjoyed it.

[Pete 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Mr_Pew]

@JMcMurdockMP 👏

[Stewart Michael @MikeStewart79]

I’ve never voted Conservative. Living in Dundee, I’ve voted tactically for Labour because it was the only realistic way to keep the SNP out. I’m pro‑UK, and I’ve always backed whichever option gave Scotland the best chance of stability and unity.

But let’s be honest: the old parties have run out of road.
Labour, the Conservatives, the SNP, they all react the same way to Reform.
Not by debating the issues, but by attacking the people.
Not by answering the arguments, but by smearing the supporters.

They’re scared.
Because Reform isn’t a fringe movement, it’s a response to their failure.

Here’s the reality they don’t want to acknowledge:

Reform supporters are normal people.

The ones I see every day?
Builders. Nurses. Drivers. Teachers. Small business owners.
Up early, grafting all day, raising families, paying mortgages, keeping the country running.
No chaos. No drama. Just responsibility, decency, and backbone.

These are the people who keep Britain standing.
Not extremists. Not caricatures.
Just ordinary citizens who’ve had enough of being ignored and patronised.

Meanwhile, the political establishment, across all parties,would rather label than listen.
They shout “dangerous” because it’s easier than admitting they’ve lost touch with the country.

Reform isn’t the threat.
Reform is the consequence.

People want competence.
People want honesty.
People want a party that defends the UK without the spin, the tribalism, or the excuses.

Normalising Reform isn’t radical.
It’s simply recognising where the public actually are.

The old parties broke trust.
Reform is what happens next.

[Pete 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Mr_Pew]

@WARDOGS I hope early access means tomorrow! Haha, this looks great, cant wait to play it 👌