@HMardenborough@beforethestars@Trumperizar Because they’ve lead the country since the revolution in 1688 😂
Stop patting yourself on the back for being better than barbarians lol you ain’t that much better. It remained legal to rape your wife in England, up until ~1991
Well done for not marrying your cousin though 👏🏻🤣
@indicolt3434@SarahParri31528@1776General_ CBS, it was in Egypt. They were ‘celebrating’ their revolution. They called her an “Israeli Jew”, and consequently hundreds of them “raped her with their hands” (her words) while filming it. Soldiers saved her.
She wasn’t the only one assaulted, 52 journalists were assaulted. 🫡
@zeanxe@InkedJoe@Mangalawyer I appreciate your post because it raises a valid point, that I don’t want to refute.
But I do want to point out, by eye, the women in the screenshots likely have 34DD or larger.
It’s all the women larger than the DD that are being erased because we’re “porn”.
@Shapesharp46961@itsmelaurin I’m sorry to hear that. Hopefully you’ve removed and recovered from that situation and she got the mental health assistance she needed to not be threatened by inanimate pixels and pictures 🥰
@InkedJoe@Mangalawyer I don’t like how “not normal” women, like me, are never represented in games anymore.
Even a hint of our chest under layers of clothes is too vulgar and offensive. So offensive that we’re somehow sexist.
Signed: “Pornified”, “not normal”, “you people”, c. my 13th birthday. 👍🏻
@Pirat_Nation Ugly?
I think you’re absolutely wrong and missing the real design problem.
These are all very ‘average’ looking — which is, I assume, what they were aiming for.
Some should be really beautiful, some really ugly.
Instead… they’re all “meh”. Forgettable. Boring.
@fandompulse Does it make what game better? How could it make the game better?
The manufactured anger and hysteria of ‘gamers’ on X and other places doesn’t represent most gamers who do what they always have done.
Buy games they want to play and don’t buy games they don’t want to play 🤦🏻♀️
@nonautomatedbot@WillAttract It hurts both sides in a mismatch. One feels rejected, the other feels guilty and both feel inadequate.
But the damage isn’t a lack of sex, it’s the relational friction or abusive handling of it.
That harm is negated through communication, understanding and non-sexual bonding.
@JustinPetersMin@ApolloLXII If your ego requires that you were created by a boundless deity, why not compare your intelligence to bacteria?
Better yet, why not a rock?
Name me one rock with an ego as inflated as yours?
Luke 19:40
I tell you, if they keep silent, the stones will cry out.
@BrainBlenderTec@D057009422@WillAttract@grok A kangaroo court perhaps. I sent you direct legislation, I sent you legal advice from a legal firm, I sent you advice from Canadian and UK government. I sent you advice from sex abuse and domestic abuse charities.
At this point I’d say you’re a troll. Or a kid 🤷🏻♀️
@BrainBlenderTec@D057009422@WillAttract@grok I don’t need to apply them anywhere,
you’re the one struggling to understand that nobody is required to have sex and coercion ≠ consent🤦🏻♀️
The law is there, it’s well understood and I’ve sent you tonnes of info to help you understand
@BrainBlenderTec@D057009422@WillAttract@grok There’s no argument, I gave you examples of behaviours that are considered coercive.
You’re struggling with this so:
US-
https://t.co/0Rl8MLey0L
https://t.co/z0frh656uY
CA-
https://t.co/3dwrfJwxsx
https://t.co/zltYIDBH8k
UK-
https://t.co/h3C53hawWG
https://t.co/jQCcM3qNQS
@BrainBlenderTec@D057009422@WillAttract@grok It says nothing about “separating because needs aren’t being fulfilled”.
Threatening to leave your partner if they won’t have sex with you? — potentially coercive
Leaving your partner because they won’t have sex with you? — definitely not coercive.
See the difference? 🤦🏻♀️
@BrainBlenderTec@D057009422@WillAttract@grok It has been able to be raised in my country for a long time.
Coercive control has been established in UK law since 2015 in the Serious Crime Act.
Saying:
“I won’t have sex with you unless…”
is potentially coercive, and very different to
“I don’t want sex right now”. 👍🏻
@ns123abc@AmandaAskell He’s managed to get you all talking about a completely different topic than his original point.
Having children doesn’t make you a better steward of humanity, nor a better arbiter of morality. A sperm/egg donor can technically have children. As do many rapists and philanderers.
@nonautomatedbot@WillAttract You have to appreciate the distinction between necessary, beneficial and harmful.
Necessary = required for homeostasis
Benefit = more healthy
Harm = less healthy
No benefit ≠ harm
No harm ≠ benefit
Sex is beneficial.
Its absence is not harmful.
@boristmus@JonasKilker I don’t know that I would call it ‘aura’, or say it’s just female, more important on average though, I’d agree.
Behaviour, posture, gestures, words, these are the key modifiers.
Most start at 5/10, some start at 6/10, some start at 4/10.
The modifiers take you ⤴️10 or ⤵️0.
@BrainBlenderTec@D057009422@WillAttract@grok Guilt/pressure/responsibility vitiates consent. FYI🤷🏻♀️
Your account is based in Canada, so, it’s worth noting what you’re describing is illegal.
I’ve attached some info I recommend you read to better understand consent to protect yourself and others: