Step 1: Collate all necessary information and data
Step 2: Verify all necessary data. Discard data that does not align with other correlating data
Step 3: Create a decision workflow on when and how discarded data will be the current narrative. These become “risk factors”
Step 4: Create a decision workflow on how to qualify/disqualify information that aligns or deviates from said data, and engage when info is qualified, making sure to create clear protocols of risk engagement
Step 5: If current information does not align with data; walk away. If current information aligns and is qualified, pull the trigger without overthinking. If current information deviates from data, let the risk protocols do its job.
Step 6: Collate all necessary information points and compare with data, what decision-making protocols would’ve yielded a more positive performance?
Bandits openly carrying heavy weapons like this, and we’re supposed to believe everything is under control? Where are they getting these guns from? The government needs to answer.