@AstroGann33 I'm interested in buying your books, which one is best for learning about astrological influences on the stock market... Also how is the Dawn of the 7th Day different from Astrological Decans and Market Cycles. Thanks for your work 🙏
🚨 Morgan Stanley just dropped a list of 39 “National Security” stocks — and it’s basically a cheat sheet for the next decade of U.S. industrial dominance.
This isn’t your typical watchlist — it’s a who’s who of the companies the U.S. needs to stay ahead in energy, defense, and AI supply chains.
Let’s break it down 👇
⚛️ Nuclear Energy & Uranium:
The U.S. wants energy independence — and that means uranium.
Names like $UUUU, $LEU, $CCJ, and $NXE are at the center of the nuclear revival. Even micro-reactor plays like $OKLO are making noise as America rebuilds its atomic backbone.
🔋 Batteries & Energy Storage:
$TSLA is still here, but the real upside could come from lesser-knowns like $AMPX (next-gen lithium-ion) and $MVST (solid-state tech).
These are the quiet enablers of the EV and grid storage boom — and every megawatt stored is national security now.
🪨 Rare Earths & Strategic Metals:
China controls 70%+ of this market — and the U.S. wants out.
Morgan Stanley highlights $MP, $CRML, $IVN, and $WPM as key players in securing rare earth supply chains critical for chips, missiles, and EVs.
⚡ Lithium:
Without lithium, there is no clean energy transition.
Watch $ALB, $LAC, $SGML, and $SLI — these are the lifelines for the world’s next battery superpowers.
💡 The takeaway:
This “National Security Index” isn’t just about defense — it’s about control of the future’s raw power: energy, data, and materials.
And the firms on this list aren’t just suppliers — they’re the gatekeepers of U.S. sovereignty in a world of rising geopolitical tension.
If you’re betting on where the big government money flows next… this might be your roadmap.
“If I put $100 in Bitcoin in 2010 I’d have $2.8B now.”
No.
If you bought $100 of Bitcoin in 2010 and watched it go to:
$1k → $100k → $1.7M
and did nothing
Then watched $1.7M go to $170k
and still did nothing
Then watched $170k go to $110M
and still did nothing
Then watched $110M wither to $18M
and still did nothing
Then watched $18M surge to $390M
and still did nothing
Then watched $390M deteriorate to $85M
Then watched $85M climb to $1.6B
and still did nothing
Then watched $1.6B shrink to $390M
and still did nothing
Then watched $390M surge to $2.8B
and then for some reason finally decided to do something…
Then yes, $100 in 2010 would be worth $2.8B today.
@RaoulGMI has said it before Tom Lee. Ethereum could be the next Bitcoin with a potential to see $20,000 if the 2017 bitcoin pattern repeats. Could $ETH see $100K at the next potential $BTC halving cycle in 2028?