El argumento estrella contra comprar Bitcoin sin KYC: "¿Y cómo me compro una casa?".
Eso basta para que la mayoría ceda sus datos a un exchange.
El problema es que esos datos se van a perder. No hay plataforma de terceros que no haya filtrado la información de sus clientes. 🧵
L292.A - Por qué comprar #bitcoin privado, junto a @Multicripto
Tratamos:
- Qué es bitcoin sin KYC
- Ventajas y desventajas
- Legalidad
- Estado de salud del sin KYC en 2026
- Listas negras de ciudadanos
- Cuentas congeladas ❄️
- Hacienda & SEPBLAC
Toma acción próximo tweet⤵️
L295.C - ATAQUES DE GASTO 🚨
Ya sabemos acumular pero falta una última Misión Autocustodia porque...
-> gastando #bitcoin también puedes perderlo todo 💀
🔊 Sonido activado
LINK siguiente tweet ⤵️
Fulcrum 2.1.4 has just been released. Get it here: https://t.co/BU9EZpNxrC
It contains a very nice speedup for wallet synching submitted by Cake Wallet's @sethforprivacy . Thanks Seth!
We ship across Europe, with locker delivery available in as many countries as possible.
But here's the weird part: Spanish Bitcoiners are BY FAR our biggest customer base outside France.
So what's going on in Spain? Are Spanish Bitcoiners simply more based than the rest of Europe? Did some Spanish influencers secretly become our unpaid marketing department?
Could Spain be the last country in Europe with a functioning Chad population? 🇪🇸😂
🚨🇫🇷 ALERTE INFO - VOICI L'AMPLEUR DES DÉGÂTS DANS LA CAPITALE AU LENDEMAIN DU 17 OCTOBRE. COMMERCES PILLÉS, VÉHICULE INCENDIÉS, PROJECTILES AU SOL, POUBELLES RENVERSÉES. Les dégâts devraient se chiffrer en milliards d'euros.
(Media Brut)
#17octobre
@MisterYO504 Depende de como gastes lo obtenido, uniendo monedas directamente o hijas/nietas de esas monedas, se acabará sabiendo que un usuario lo ha hecho a mano.
@MisterYO504 un stonewall puede ser hecho con una persona o con 2 siendo indistingubles. Un stowaway no se puede indentificar.
Si haces una tx por lotes simulando un coinjoin y sin tener el esquema de los principales coinjoins puede decucirse que un usuario lo ha hecho
Imagine someone gives you a lock and tells you it's the safest lock in the world.
You ask how they designed it.
They say, "We picked some special numbers. Trust us."
Now imagine that someone is the NSA.
That's essentially what happened with some of the elliptic curves standardized by NIST. These mathematical curves are used to secure digital communications, and some contained mysterious numbers whose origins nobody could explain.
For decades, cryptographers wondered whether those numbers had been deliberately chosen to hide a secret weakness.
Then Claude investigated and found something remarkable: the mysterious seeds apparently came from an ordinary 1990s random-number generator initialized using a computer's clock.
No evidence of a secret mathematical trap. Just surprisingly mundane mathematics.
Now here's where Bitcoin gets interesting.
Out of paranoia, Satoshi chose a different, not widely used curve, secp256k1, with an extraordinarily simple equation:
y² = x³ + 7
No mysterious seed needed to explain its shape, just a 7.
We don't know whether that motivated Satoshi's choice, but it illustrates something fundamental about Bitcoin.
Security shouldn't depend on trusting the people who designed the system.
Even if the NSA never intended anything malicious, asking where those numbers came from was absolutely the right question.
Because the goal of cryptography isn't to prove that everyone is trustworthy.
It's to build systems where they don't have to be.
Don't trust. Verify.