Muncha

🇬🇧🇮🇳 🕉

[NPOV @npovmedia]

Who decides what the internet "knows" about an organization? That process starts on @Wikipedia.

In the case of @HinduAmerican, we found that four editors were responsible for most of the page's content—helping shape how the organization is represented across search, AI, and the wider web. 👇

[Arun Pudur @arunpudur]

‼️Hannah Ellis Peterson, British Agent who works for the Guardian.

She was in the forefront of Bangladesh Islamists Riots coverage.

[Shesh Paul Vaid @spvaid]

Shameful @UNHumanRights @UN

[Chris Blackburn @CJBdingo25]

I'm not sure British media are doing their due diligence on the Henry Nowak issue. Khalistanis have injected radicalism, and sometimes the glorification of violence and intimidation, into Sikh communities in the UK.

Boosting loudmouths who support radicalism isn't a good idea. @LBC take note.

[Politics UK @PolitlcsUK]

🚨 NEW: Sikhs in Southampton say they’re scared to leave their homes after facing racial abuse over Henry Nowak’s murder

[@thetimes]

[Josh Wolfe @wolfejosh]

This is a disgusting disgraceful and intentional attack and threat on Indian Americans and all Hindus. 🇺🇸🇮🇳

Denounce it.

[Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ @sankrant]

“Hindu for Human Rights” is the Islamic proxy group created for waging narrative war against Hindus. See the reveal.

[Laav Patel @VaidikaHindu]

Claims that Henry was killed because he was white, or that Digwa acted out of Sikh beliefs, were not established by the court. Motive and intent are central to understanding why a crime was committed, and the court made no finding that either factor played a role.

[Hindu American Foundation @HinduAmerican]

HAF RESPONDS TO THE INVESTIGATION BY @npovmedia!

A small group of anonymous editors shape how millions of people understand an organization.

HAF’s Executive Director @SuhagAShukla and Managing Director Raj Rao respond to findings from NPOV’s investigation by @AshleyRindsberg into the editing of its Wikipedia page, raising questions about editorial bias, conflicts of interest, sourcing standards, and the power to shape public perception online.

Watch this exposé now!

[Savitri Mumukshu - सावित्री मुमुक्षु @MumukshuSavitri]

Even the ex-founder of Wikipedia is calling out Wikipedia for allowing malicious propagandaists linked to Audrey Truschke to smear the reputation of Hindu American Foundation. Imagine how cleverly the hatemongers have manipulated online media to ensure that biases against Hindus become deeply embedded.

[Larry Sanger @lsanger]

Just four Wikipedia accounts can smear the reputation of an organization like the Hindu American Foundation.

Think this an isolated case?

BTW, Ashley Rindsberg (@NPOV) does some of the best reporting about Wikipedia and its bias—not just left-wing bias. Follow.

[Ashley Rindsberg @AshleyRindsberg]

For years, major institutions have framed India and Hindus through the lens of nationalism, extremism, and suspicion. But what we've uncovered on @Wikipedia raises a deeper question: who gets to write the public record?

Our investigation found that a small cluster of anonymous editors controlled more than 80% of the @HinduAmerican page. Among the findings:

Blatant Conflict of Interest: The editors aggressively shaping HAF’s page were the exact same people controlling the Wikipedia profiles of HAF's legal adversaries and academic critics.

Inserting False FARA Allegations: Editors laundered complaints from HAF's opponents into "facts," using demands for a DOJ investigation to falsely brand HAF as a foreign agent

Administrative Silencing: An admin with supreme platform permissions deleted quotes from HAF's leadership, stripping the organization of its right to reply to allegations.

Over four years (2021-2025), editors systematically erased HAF’s identity as an American civil rights group, transforming its Wikipedia page into a heavily curated dossier of accusations. Our report from @npovmedia documents how it happened. 👇

[Muncha @Muncha108]

@ThePujaTeli He keeps getting destroyed and just keeps going, lol.

[Muncha @Muncha108]

Why did you fudge the radiocarbon dates on your Gobekli Tepe precursor timeline? The sites you listed existed at the same time, not before.

Sort out your own confirmation bias before lecturing the rest of us on secular methodology.

[David Miano @DrDavidMiano]

There is a very good reason why historians approach the past in a secular fashion, and this includes deeply religious historians.

So I want to talk about the value of the secular approach, and the NECESSITY of the secular approach to history.

Some people hear the word “secular” and think it means “anti-religious,” but that is not what the secular historical method means.

It means that historical arguments must be made using evidence and reasoning that do not depend on first accepting the truth of a particular religious tradition.

A historian can be a Christian, Jew, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, atheist, agnostic, or anything else. But they all agree that they must argue their points in a way that is accessible to people who do not already share their beliefs.

That is because history is a public discipline. Its claims must be open to examination, challenge, correction, and debate from anyone, anywhere.

1/

[Muncha @Muncha108]

@DrDavidMiano You were caught fudging dates with your own work. Perhaps address that before preaching to others.
https://t.co/GpE0IzupCI

[Muncha @Muncha108]

Why did you fudge the radiocarbon dates on your Gobekli Tepe precursor timeline? The sites you listed existed at the same time, not before.

Sort out your own confirmation bias before lecturing the rest of us on secular methodology.

[Muncha @Muncha108]

Not to pick sides, but @Benleo casually admitting that the Brits raped, murdered and pillaged the world is peak, they aren't even trying to hide it anymore, lol.

[Ben Leo @Benleo]

Me: certain nationalities in UK are more likely to commit sexual offences than Brits

Leftist nutcase: “I’m gonna break your f*****g jaw.”

ICE detention facility in New Jersey.

I’m not surprised Charlie Kirk was murdered. These people are lunatics.

[Puja Teli @ThePujaTeli]

‘In one tweet, Truschke referred to Rama as a “misogynist” and used a slur after the word. When asked to justify this claim, she cited a translation of the Ramayana by Robert Goldman. When Prof. Goldman was contacted, he said: “I find it extremely disturbing but perhaps not unexpected to learn that AT (Audrey Trushcke) has used such inappropriate language and passed it off as coming from Valmiki.

Neither the great poet nor we used such a vulgar diction and certainly Sita would never have used such language to her husband even in the midst of emotional distress. Nowhere in our translation of the passage do we use words you mention AT as using… she is in no way quoting our translation but giving her own reading of the passage in her own highly inappropriate language.”’

[SanksP 🇮🇳🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @SanksP]

@DrDavidMiano @ThePujaTeli Now you are just getting sloppy

I said TLDR to a wall of text you provided on a thread which STARTS by quoting your AI slop

People can check the entire sequence here

https://t.co/ye4kYpjt9R

[Muncha @Muncha108]

Deliberately misreading a simple analogy to avoid engaging with it. If this is how you handle arguments you don't like, why should anyone trust your reading of sources from thousands of years ago?

[David Miano @DrDavidMiano]

@Muncha108 Yes, it is an analytical tool. That's the point.

Wait a minute. Claim to the Gospels? What does that even mean? Everybody can read the Gospels. They are in the public domain.

[Muncha @Muncha108]

Hindus have been describing their own tradition continuously for thousands of years. Western academics imposing a start date that contradicts that lived continuity isn't scholarship, it's just another form of neo-colonialism.

[Muncha @Muncha108]

Who is "We"?

Western academics invented these labels during colonial rule. Hindus never stopped calling it their own tradition. You're presenting academic periodisation as historical fact.

"Vedic religion" vs "Hinduism" is a labelling distinction, not evidence of discontinuity

[David Miano @DrDavidMiano]

@thar_ol Hinduism arose only after the second urbanization and move to the Ganges region. Prior to that time, we call it Vedic religion or Brahmanism.

[Muncha @Muncha108]

The Vedas are shruti, foundational to what followers have always called Sanatana Dharma. The Upanishads, Gita and Puranas flow directly from them. There is no internal break. Just one continuous tradition, not two separate religions.