@JonahDispatch No, the Left are just ignorant: they have no sense of world history or the nature of the ideal relationship between Islam and the State. Perhaps they hate Israel reflexively not because it’s a Jewish state but because it is a democracy with people who look like us.
The architecture of the international economic system was reconfigured at the end of WWII. America was a leader in promoting free trade. #Trump is now rethinking globalization and its discontents.
For my Episcopalian friends:
Listen to Bishop Budde’s entire sermon. Its theme was three aspects of unity: dignity of the individual, telling the truth, and humility. It was not based on scripture, and it was illogical at key points. As such, it was okay but was crafted as a typically mediocre sermon by an Episcopal priest—I’ve heard hundreds of them.
It’s crux was cribbed from Solzhenitsyn’s Gulag Archipelago, “The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either -- but right through every human heart -- and through all human hearts. This line shifts. Inside us, it oscillates with the years. And even within hearts overwhelmed by evil, one small bridgehead of good is retained.”
Even there she left out the part about redemption. She absolutely lectured a sitting president on his duty. She used overwrought examples, not based in the reality of proposed policy, and created fear and division where she should have created unity by her own example. She used her ecclesiastical power to harangue a political leader.
The sermon would have been much more effective if she had used the gospel reading to show how Christ displayed compassion to the least among us.
But she couldn’t do it. The line between good and evil is inside every one of us. And often enough evil masquerades as virtue signaling by those in power, be it ecclesiastical or political.
I just wish the academics who talk about “fascism” day in and day out could expand their alarmist repertoire even a tiny bit, if only to make the discourse less boring. Here’s one suggestion (just to help articulate a view I emphatically do *not* share): a much more interesting historical analogy would be Napoleon III, who attempted two failed coups, was elected to the presidency as a champion of the working class against the liberal elite, and then made himself Emperor.
@Econ_4_Everyone I gave up the quaint notion that economics was a science around 1995. If we were a science, then our publication process would be much different.