Sleep shapes how you eat. Recovery defines your energy. Habits quietly drive everything.
@sleepagotchi understands that these pieces aren’t separate, they’re connected.
That’s why they built four AI agents around a single system: Sleep Coach, Wellness Coach, Meal Planner and Shopping Agent.
Each agent focuses on a different layer of your health, but they all share the same context about you.
Instead of juggling multiple apps, you interact with one unified intelligence that actually understands your lifestyle.
And it starts with the Sleep Coach
Welp, that happened faster than I predicted. Thought it would be end of 2027, then early 2027, but agentic traffic growing so fast that bots have now passed human traffic online for the first time in the Internet's history. https://t.co/2zX5bHdhsa
Exodus / Ethereum /
I've been Ethereum Nomad since 2014,
older than the coin.
The ethereum mercenary / symbolism speaks to me:
Ξ / greek ksi means detached-from
The visual shape of Ξ suggests
"an entity that is not touching anything from above or below"
"ksen"- (Ξεν-) as a prefix means guest, foreigner, mercenary - someone who found his path out, exodus
Why? Maybe it's a Fenno-Ugric dream. Written as a quaternary codescript in me. Who knows. Uralic Mountain peaks, reindeers, coniferous trees, wind & spores ᨒ↟𐂂 𖠰𖥧 𓍊𓋼❄︎
This mRNA is made in < 3 wks vein-to-vein time ... on-demand ... in a patient-specific way ... and thus is not in the IND.
= RNA on-demand for severe disease. In 3 weeks.
Hmmm. What does this remind one of?
Could it be ... gene editing on demand?
Yup. Watch this space.
One of the most amazing things I’ve ever seen: a standing ovation for the full Daraxonrasib results
I feel inspired and energised, to put it mildly — we have a targeted therapy for pancreatic cancer now, and nothing is undruggable anymore
This mRNA is made in < 3 wks vein-to-vein time ... on-demand ... in a patient-specific way ... and thus is not in the IND.
= RNA on-demand for severe disease. In 3 weeks.
Hmmm. What does this remind one of?
Could it be ... gene editing on demand?
Yup. Watch this space.
@sashastiles Long ago I tried to write my PhD thesis on polyphonic theory of languages. Bakhtin, Ducrot ...etc
As you said transformer architecture changed everything; the whole scene, not the academic side though 🙃 so mushroom farming was an obvious alternative
"It was the realization that transformer-based architectures treat everything as language: thought, memory, culture, identity, images, code, relationships…"
... biological processes across the holobiont, organisms, species 🦠🍄
People often describe my work as “AI poetry” -- sometimes superficially, eliding my lifelong engagement with philosophy, ontology, linguistics, theories of language, painting, calligraphy, bookmaking, the Classics; sometimes dismissively, as if I’m trying to outsource creativity; sometimes simply because we don’t yet have the right language for what this is; and sometimes through the lens of whether the machine-generated work or the human-written work is “better,” or whether my work is better or worse than mainstream contemporary poetry. This largely misses the point.
What cracked my world open in 2018 wasn’t the prospect of machines writing poems. Machines had been generating poetry for decades. It was the realization that transformer-based architectures treat everything as language: thought, memory, culture, identity, images, code, relationships… Years later, we’re still debating AI as a tool for generating content while all-too-often overlooking the more consequential implications of language as a fundamental substrate of intelligence, of humanity itself.
I am not interested in whether a machine can write a poem. I’m interested in what happens to me when I think through and with advanced computational systems. I’m interested in what generative AI reveals about language, creativity, the profoundly human impulse to make meaning -- about language as a technology of consciousness.
My work isn’t even about poetry as a literary genre, necessarily, which is why I’ve never considered myself a literary artist or text-based artist. I think of what I do as language art, as poetry in the most fundamental sense, one of humanity’s most ancient and resilient technologies: an enduring force that thrives at the threshold between pattern and feeling, structure and imagination, intuition and logic, flesh and code, and so is a defining medium for our time of extraordinary change. Poetry as a uniquely powerful lens through which to grapple with all that is only just beginning to emerge -- proof, against all odds, that the fusion of emotion and algorithm can deepen, rather than diminish, our humanity.
The clip below features an observation by @aza in “2073,” directed by Asif Kapadia, that captures this better than a lot of AI discourse.
CLAUDE OPUS 4.8 JUST DROPPED.
This one is going to make a lot of ChatGPT users uncomfortable.
Everyone has spent the year hyping Claude.
And this update is not slowing that down.
I have been building real tools with Claude for over a year now.
And this new update is not a just a small upgrade.
Here is how Opus 4.8 stacks up:
1. Agentic coding (SWE-Bench Pro)
↳ Claude Opus 4.8: 69.2%
↳ GPT-5.5: 58.6%
↳ Gemini 3.1 Pro: 54.2%
2. Hard reasoning with tools (Humanity's Last Exam)
↳ Claude Opus 4.8: 57.9%
↳ GPT-5.5: 52.2%
↳ Gemini 3.1 Pro: 51.4%
3. Real computer tasks (OSWorld-Verified)
↳ Claude Opus 4.8: 83.4%
↳ GPT-5.5: 78.7%
↳ Gemini 3.1 Pro: 76.2%
4. Knowledge work (GDPVal-AA)
↳ Claude Opus 4.8: 1890
↳ GPT-5.5: 1769
↳ Gemini 3.1 Pro: 1314
5. Financial analysis (Finance Agent v2)
↳ Claude Opus 4.8: 53.9%
↳ GPT-5.5: 51.8%
↳ Gemini 3.1 Pro: 43.0%
6. GPT-5.5 does win terminal coding at 78.2% vs Claude's 74.6%.
Not everything goes Claude's way here.
But regardless Claude wins nearly every benchmark that matters for real work.
So here is the real question nobody is asking:
Does this update push more ChatGPT users to finally make the switch?
Or does cheaper pricing and familiarity keep them paying for second place?
I use ChatGPT for simple projects and Claude when I need something more complex. What about you? Let me know in the comments below.