Nathan Dines

[Fred Baker @CountingCoupTac]

“You pity the moth
Confusing a lamp
For the moon.

Yet here you are
Confusing a screen
For the world.”

[Ross Coulthart @rosscoulthart]

It’s commendable to see @LueElizondo talking openly about these mysterious lunar anomalies. Viewers of REALITY CHECK will know we’ve done multiple shows on this in the past few months and this week’s show questions former @NASA independent study team member Mike Gold about them.

[QUANTUM GUARD ™️ @QuantumGuard17]

🚨 HOLY CRAP, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary CONFIRMED the FDA purposefully lied to the people for nearly 2 decades against dietary fats to help Big Pharma

People avoided fat and ate MORE SUGAR, so Pharma could sell them more drugs.

RFK Jr. just declared open WAR on added sugar

“They suppressed the data for 16 years…Those in the low-fat group had higher rates of heart attacks!”

“We created a generation of children with low protein, high carbohydrates, sugar addiction, and burdened with ultra-processed foods, and what did we do as a medical field? Drugged them at scale!”

“Those days are OVER. We are telling people the truth about food.”

MAHA WILL WIN!

[James May @MrJamesMay]

To celebrate independence, I’ve put new boots on the ACA Scout.

This is the best aeroplane (sp) the US has produced in 250 years of freedom. Better, even, than the P40.

Thank you for your attention etc.

[Matthew @SunOfAbramelin]

A very happy 250th Independence Day celebration to everyone. Excited to share that the Vanguard Enterprise has launched. Expect to hear more in the coming weeks and months. Good things are coming!

It has been a tremendous struggle for @TheDylanBorland and I to get to this point, and we must thank our silent team of volunteers who have helped make this dream a reality. Thank you! We could not have done this without you.

[Garry P. Nolan @GarryPNolan]

1/ UAP Ecosystem 2026: SOL Foundation, Disclosure Foundation & the UAP Governing Board Three major players shaping UAP/non-human intelligence (NHI) research, policy, and transparency. Here’s a clear breakdown of their roles, differences, synergies, and risks.

2/ SOL Foundation Academic-policy hybrid think tank founded in 2023 by Stanford immunologist/pathologist Garry Nolan (Executive Director of the Board) and sociocultural anthropologist Peter Skafish (Executive Director). Early involvement from David Grusch (COO role, later shifted). Assembles experts from natural/social sciences, humanities, engineering, and government (e.g., former IC IG Charles McCullough as legal counsel). https://t.co/rhCFvO1zGE

3/
Core Mission Advance rigorous, multidisciplinary research on UAP/NHI implications and generate informed policy recommendations. Emphasizes philosophical, scientific, and societal dimensions (physics, energy, religion, democracy, institutions). Encourages government transparency, academic collaboration, and produces peer-reviewed work such as UAP materials analysis and white papers on executive secrecy harms.

4/ Disclosure Foundation Nonpartisan civil society nonprofit focused on advancing public disclosure and scientific understanding of UAP. Key figures: Christopher Mellon (Board Chair, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence) and Executive Director Jordan Flowers. Operates via three pillars: policy leadership, legal action, and public education. https://t.co/0vaB5tPxf1

5/ Prioritizes transparency, oversight, accountability (including potential crash retrievals and private contractor materials), and building public/political pressure for responsible disclosure. Activities include DC forums, policy briefs, surveys showing bipartisan support, NASA archive reviews, and initiatives like DisclosureOS standards.

6/ UAP Governing Board & Science Advisory Council Government/interagency structure under the Trump administration (as of 2026). Science Advisory Council chaired by Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb. Advises on resolving UAP’s nature using scientific methods. Reports to the higher Governing Board, which coordinates military, law enforcement, IC, and civilian agencies for national security threats, incident investigation, data collection/analysis (supporting AARO), and declassification per EO 13526.

7/ Nolan and Skafish sit on the Science Advisory Council (alongside others like Tim Gallaudet). Explicitly noted as non-conflicting with their SOL roles. Focus is pragmatic and data-driven: better sensors/AI, addressing potential adversarial tech or anomalies, and supporting timely but orderly declassification. Loeb’s background ties it to systematic searches (e.g., Galileo Project).

8/ Differences in Scope SOL Foundation operates at a broad, foundational academic-policy level outside direct government control. Expansive and long-term scope: building infrastructure for UAP studies across disciplines (materials science, anthropology, religion, economy, politics). Produces independent white papers and convenes symposia to normalize serious inquiry. More about preparing society/science for a post-UAP reality than immediate activism.

9/ Disclosure Foundation is narrower and more activist/advocacy-oriented in the civil society space. Centers on compelling transparency through legal pressure (FOIAs, whistleblower protections), congressional engagement, and public mobilization. Directly addresses crash retrievals, legacy programs, and accountability. More operational “pushing” than broad theoretical research.

10/ UAP Governing Board/Science Advisory Council is the narrowest and most institutionalized/government-embedded. Operational and security-focused: data interpretation, interagency coordination, incident response, and declassification to resolve UAP’s nature (human tech, adversarial, or anomalous). Prioritizes empirical resolution via unclassified data, sensors, and AI rather than philosophical breadth or public activism. Lacks subpoena power.

11/ In short: SOL builds intellectual and policy foundations for a new paradigm. Disclosure agitates for access and accountability from outside. The Governing Board integrates and operationalizes within government for security and resolution.

12/ Synergies Nolan and Skafish’s dual roles create direct channels: SOL’s independent insights inform government advice, while council access to (limited) data can guide SOL research — with no apparent conflict. Disclosure’s legal/policy pressure and public education complement SOL’s white papers by creating momentum and legitimacy. All three advance transparency through different tracks. Shared figures and goals (better data handling, whistleblower pathways) allow parallel progress.

13/ Downsides & Risks Overlaps (Nolan/Skafish) risk perceived capture or diluted independence, even without formal conflict. SOL’s academic credibility could be questioned if seen as too aligned with government. SOL’s broad ambition can slow progress with philosophical debates. Disclosure’s activist push risks politicization or premature sensational claims without ironclad evidence.

14/ The Governing Board’s government-embedded nature invites skepticism of slow-walking, limited access (no subpoenas, unclassified data only), or national-security framing that downplays broader implications.

Resource competition, messaging fragmentation, and over-reliance on key personalities (Nolan, Mellon, Loeb) create vulnerabilities.

The Board’s security focus might prioritize threats over SOL’s NHI openness or Disclosure’s accountability emphasis.

15/ Overall: The ecosystem is robust but prone to coordination frictions in a historically secretive domain. SOL builds the foundation. Disclosure applies pressure. The Board operationalizes inside government.

Together they offer complementary paths forward.

[Nathan Dines @NADhimself]

SAY NO TO DEVON DATA CAMPUS- Go fund me in description! - Sign the Petition! https://t.co/XRzNUfjNNQ via @UKChange

[Nathan Dines @NADhimself]

https://t.co/N8FLAkN60J

[James Fox @jamescfox]

Quick announcement:

[Nathan Dines @NADhimself]

Another guy enters the room. I'm goin crazy! Time to take a break I think!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Nathan Dines @NADhimself]

@rosscoulthart Anyone else notice the AI mask (is that a thing now?)? Seen at 03:10?

[Nathan Dines @NADhimself]

@rosscoulthart https://t.co/H4U5WFwN5e @ 3:05

[Ross Coulthart @rosscoulthart]

I enjoyed Stephen Spielberg's provocative DISCLOSURE DAY movie at its Sydney premier last night. So how close is that fictional telling to the alleged reality of a UAP craft/tech/alien bodies retrieval and reverse-engineering program? How far have we come towards real Disclosure in the last few years? To find out, Join me Sat 8pm ET/7CT for a NEWS NATION primetime special ROAD TO DISCLOSURE.

[Nathan Dines @NADhimself]

Looks like they both have some kind of digital mask on!?

[Nathan Dines @NADhimself]

https://t.co/H4U5WFwN5e

Please watch!!!!! 03:05

What is going on? Has Newsnation now been compromised!?

[Post Disclosure World @PostDisclosure]

Good luck out there, David Grusch.

What you’re doing matters to a lot of people.

[Garry P. Nolan @GarryPNolan]

@DrBeaVillarroel Absolutely superb! Case closed.

There's a rarity in science to claiming "proof" rather than just "supports the hypothesis". You've crossed the boundary and this is proof the transients are not plate errors.

Now... what EXACTLY they are remains to be "seen"!

[Beatriz Villarroel @DrBeaVillarroel]

This is HUGE news.
PhD astronomer and former NASA engineer Ivo Busko has single-handedly driven a final nail into the coffin of the contamination-based hypotheses (e.g. plate defects and cosmic rays) proposed to explain the VASCO transients. He did so using one of the most creative approaches in astronomy I have ever seen: by analysing pre-Sputnik photographic plates from a German telescope known to suffer from severe optical distortions (aberrations), he demonstrated that the transients appear on these plates and exhibit the same optical distortions as the stars themselves. They are slightly narrower and sharper than the stars, consistent with brief flashes.

This is a crucial result. It shows that the transient light passed through the telescope optics, meaning the transients originate from real objects producing light, rather than from plate defects or cosmic-ray contamination that hit the plate. Dr Busko has also shown that the transients cluster spatially and are associated with periods close to nuclear tests. See the example of the triple transient with optical comas.

This is the greatest gift. Congratulations, Ivo.

I'm happy beyond belief.

Read Ivo Busko's paper: https://t.co/6CT58wnsKJ

[wow @wow36932525]

NEWSNATION LIVESTREAM LINK:

Watch live: UFO whistleblower, lawmakers aim to declassify UAP files

https://t.co/QXaZWUg37b

[Jesse Michels @AlchemyAmerican]

🚨BREAKING🚨: According to Investigative Journalist, Jeremy Corbell (@JeremyCorbell), a former Air Force Intelligence Officer, Matthew Sullivan, who allegedly worked directly on a recovered non-human craft died roughly two weeks before his congressional testimony. The FBI is now investigating, and the CIA has been caught running a nine-month covert operation through ODNI to surveil, entrap, and manufacture treason charges against UFO whistleblowers who had been guaranteed government protection.

Investigative Journalist Jeremy Corbell spent two decades building a network of credible witnesses into classified congressional testimony. He and his longtime mentor George Knapp (@g_knapp) were the first to hear about David Grusch’ ICIG complaint at a bar in Huntsville, Alabama. He and the whistleblowers like Dylan Borland and Matthew Brown (@SunOfAbramelin) have been systematically targeted by the CIA. Here is what that operation looked like: ODNI's Director's Initiative Group presented itself as a protected channel for whistleblowers. Corbell and Knapp sent them sources in good faith over nine months. Every person they brought in had their phones, computers, and communications surveilled by CIA, including (and illegally) Jeremy and George. ODNI then fabricated a claim that Dylan Borland had drawn a classified sensor system in his testimony, a lie designed to expose him to a treason charge carrying the death penalty. When confronted, ODNI backed down. A CIA agent who ran the DIG came before Congress days before this recording and admitted the surveillance. The CIA's response was that he was not authorized to speak. That is not a denial.

Amidst all of this is the tragic story of Matthew Sullivan. He worked directly on a recovered non-human craft, was one of the forty witnesses Grusch brought to the ICIG, and died approximately two weeks before he was scheduled to testify to Congress behind closed doors. The FBI is investigating. A congressional letter exists. Corbell had received a Signal message from Sullivan that subsequently auto-deleted. Also in this conversation: Dylan Borland's classified ICIG drawings, which include a pyramid-shaped non-human power source the US has been attempting to retrofit into its own craft, the full origin story of how David Grusch came out, and independent corroboration of Bob Lazar at S4 from a Blackbird pilot. All of this is documented in the fantastic new documentary Sleeping Dog about Jeremy’s origin story with UFOs, from John Lear to George Knapp to Bob Lazar until the present day.

Full conversation is live now.