Sourdough just turned into a global taste test 🍞
A quick video shows Italians rating a homemade sourdough loaf.
Team crusty or soft—would you try it? Drop 🔥
Your next home tour might fit in your pocket.
A phone scan lets you walk through an entire house in 3D—room by room.
Would you buy a home this way—genius or overkill? 👀
🚨 SOMEONE JUST KILLED THE REAL ESTATE INDUSTRY
A guy scanned an entire house with his phone. Uploaded it.
Now anyone on Earth can walk through it in a browser tab. No app. No VR. No agent. No appointment.
Click → you’re inside. Every room. Every angle. Every shadow. Photoreal.
The numbers are insane:
- Agent fee on a $500k home: $15,000
- Cost to make this scan: ~$200
- Time to “tour” 50 houses: one evening
- File size: smaller than a TikTok
The science is wild too:
It’s called 3D Gaussian Splatting instead of polygons (how games render), it uses millions of tiny glowing “splats” of color and depth.
AI reconstructs reality from your photos. The result loads on a phone and looks like you’re THERE.
The grift opportunity is even wilder:
Freelancers are already charging $300–$800 per scan for realtors, Airbnbs, venues, car dealers, museums.
One person + one phone + one weekend = a business.
100% Open source. Built on PlayCanvas.
Nature's most chaotic pest-control setup just went viral.
A spider web traps a wasp nest while ants raid the larvae.
Smart ecosystem or nightmare fuel—would you watch this twice? 🔥
30 years later, this mystery still stops the scroll.
A grainy car clip and a Tupac portrait fuel—and debunk—a viral claim.
Would you have paused? Drop 🔥
R.I.P. Tupac Shakur 🕊️💔
30 years ago today, the world lost one of hip-hop’s most influential voices.
His music, words and legacy still live on across generations.
June 16, 1971 — September 13, 1996. 🕊️
Forget the scoreboard—the sip is the headline.
Madison Beer watches Justin Herbert with a bright pink drink.
Genius sideline energy or overkill? Drop 🔥
Whoever invented this deserves a raise.
Dead corner cabinets? Gone. Spin once — everything’s reachable.
Kitchen people: would you actually remodel for this?
Practical upgrades that look this good → https://t.co/sWbuE4o4KS
Whoever put outlets on a couch table deserves a raise.
No more crawling behind the sofa just to charge your phone.
Be honest — genius or overkill?
We’re hunting practical upgrades like this → https://t.co/sWbuE4oCAq
POV: your commute just got a billionaire upgrade.
Bruce Wayne in a dark suit gets escorted through a crowd outside a courthouse.
Genius rollout or overkill? 🦇
The best seat in the stadium might be behind the replay console.
A video operator follows the live football action on a monitor beside the field.
Genius setup or overkill? Drop 🔥
Architecture nerds, this is the ultimate reality check.
A simulation shows two towers folding and collapsing in sequence.
Genius visual explainer or too intense? Drop 🔥
I find these World Trade Center simulations by Kostack Studio fascinating because they remove the smoke and let you see the collapse much more clearly.
In the real footage, so much is hidden by fire, dust, debris, distance, and chaos that many people come away with the impression that the towers simply dropped straight down into their own footprints.
But that is not really what happened.
These simulations make it much easier to see that the collapse begins in the heavily damaged and fire-weakened region, the upper section starts moving and tilting, and the destruction then propagates downward through the structure.
The towers do not simply disappear vertically into their own footprints. Large portions of the upper structure and exterior are moving outward and to the side as the collapse develops. Much of that motion is simply obscured in the real videos once the enormous debris cloud forms.
And this is also why I find these simulations useful when people describe the collapses as looking like “controlled demolition.”
Strip away the smoke and dust and the resemblance becomes much less convincing.
What you see is a highly asymmetric structural failure beginning around the aircraft-damaged and fire-affected floors, followed by an enormous moving mass progressively overwhelming the structure beneath it. There is tilting, rotation, exterior columns peeling away, debris being thrown far outside the building footprint, and structural failure occurring chaotically as the collapse moves downward.
That is very different from the neat mental image usually implied by “controlled demolition,” where structural supports are deliberately severed in a carefully timed sequence to produce a predetermined collapse.
And importantly, we already know what preceded these collapses.
Both towers suffered massive aircraft-impact damage. Fireproofing was stripped from portions of the structure. Large, uncontrolled fires then burned across multiple floors - for about 56 minutes in the South Tower and about 102 minutes in the North Tower - heating and weakening structural components until collapse initiated.
Once that upper mass began moving, the loads imposed on the floors and structure beneath became vastly greater than anything they had been designed to carry.
The result was progressive collapse.
No, an animation is not proof simply because it looks convincing, and these are not official NIST simulations. They are visualizations built under particular assumptions.
But as visualizations, I think they are extremely useful.
They let you see something the original footage often cannot show clearly: beneath that enormous cloud of smoke and debris was a complicated, violent, asymmetric structural failure - not two buildings neatly dropping straight down into their own footprints.
A note on the simulation: this is not intended to reproduce the collapse down to the exact motion of every beam, floor panel, and fragment of debris. No practical simulation could do that. Its value is in modeling the large-scale structural behavior - how the major sections deform, move, tilt, separate, and progressively fail. Think of it as a visualization of the mechanics and overall collapse behavior, not a frame-by-frame reconstruction of where every piece of steel ultimately landed.
Kids keep receipts better than adults do.
A child calls out her dad after he plays the game exactly like she did.
Team tiny truth-teller or team dad? 👀