@yendrive Al contrario: ser MJ fue lo que llevó a juicio. Contra un hombre común no habría habido caso por falta de pruebas. Incluso para poder acusarlo la fiscalía tuvo que cambiar la fecha del presunto abuso al descubrirse que MJ ni siquiera estaba en la ciudad
@ababohfranck Beyond the rumors, there are the facts. This podcast, dismantles the media narrative, drawing on court documents, testimonies, and more. For those seeking the truth, this is an excellent analysis.
https://t.co/hNoSokG8BT
Coming This Week!
𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑪𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒍𝒆𝒓 𝑨𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒕 2: 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑺𝒆𝒕𝒕𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕
Tuesday, October 25th, available on all podcast platforms.
Spotify: https://t.co/ByiyFyI3Bx
Apple: https://t.co/5d1vLKb1lH
#MichaelJackson#MJInnocent
@AdamxAdam1987@afroditedocerra @coelhomath93 @omuriloronchi@michaeljackson Então você acredita na Lisa quando lhe convém? Porque Lisa também afirmou naquele livro que ele iniciava a intimidade, e naquele mesmo livro disse que durante seu casamento ela tinha sido muito feliz porque eles se amavam, também disse MUITAS VEZES que eles eram um casal normal.
@MaximdeWinter5@BrunetPau Ya anunciaron la posibilidad de una segunda parte , en la línea de tiempo de las acusaciones pero tampoco le va a gustar porque si muestran las cosas tal cual pasaron y están registradas en los doc de la corte la gente se dará cuenta de su inocencia
@SaulMarch@SusieJohn3311@GerrickKennedy That was the advice his legal team gave him: the Chandlers would get the money they so desperately wanted by settling the civil case, and he would have a fair criminal trial to prove his innocence.
@SaulMarch@SusieJohn3311@GerrickKennedy Because he was also facing a criminal trial, and the judge denied his request four times to have the criminal trial first and then the civil one, he got rid of the civil case by paying to face the more important one, the criminal; it's nothing like the bodyguard case.