Little introduction post:
I run the National Socialist Literature Archive, which is dedicated to translating National Socialist material into English.
I myself am a National Socialist and know both English and German.
You can find my work on the Internet Archive: https://t.co/4cV7dp6BSK
I hope to grow this project further, but for now its restricted to the Internet Archive and Substack (with the link in bio).
May this lead to great things.
Gonna make a quick note on this:
One of the things I hate most about the Movement sphere are the "debate bro" types who pick fights over the most minute details; they never come to an agreement about anything, and they seemingly have an addiction to the attention one receives through engagement.
I used to deride those who block people when I was younger because I had the same mindset this dude had, that it was "cowardly"; now, as someone who realizes that time is valuable, and that the only value Internet arguments have is by convincing an audience instead of the opposition, I think its a wise choice to make before getting sucked into pointless threads over dishonest accusations or petty points.
Sometimes arguments are important, and I'll happily engage in ones that are done honestly; others, meanwhile, I'll just move on.
I said that National Socialism was race-first in policy in the Third Reich, he said the Third Reich was nationalism-first and argued that Hitler would've conquered the world and stripped away rights from anyone who wasn't fully Germanic, including other Whites lmao. He also accused me of "reporting him" (never considered it) and of being a pagan.
I quoted figures like Rosenberg who said otherwise, but then realized that the conversation wasn't worth it after he said being "race first" is to advocate for "race communism".
@ESchliemann1@GasMaskNat He got in a fight with me over something and we blocked each other, @AQuintilian is probably right and he blocked you because you follow me lol.
@GasMaskNat Its not worth arguing with you lol. I have a feeling its something you're addicted to, and my time is better spent doing more important things.
At least don't lie and say you're being reported by people who have never even considered reporting you.
In your ideal state Mr. Hart, would you strip away the rights of every White in North America who cannot completely prove that they're of Germanic heritage?
I'm German, my great-grandfather fought in the Wehrmacht, I have nothing to worry about in that regard. But let's hear what you have to say.
What's with the historical re-writing going on here about SS material not being "Party approved" lmao
It wasn't just practical, it was policy that was being repeated even before the war began.
My bad, White. Does that disprove anything I said?
Nations mean nothing if its people no longer exist. How the fuck is that "race communism"?
Oh hey, let's quote Rosenberg again (in "The Crisis and Building of a New Europe", 1934):
"In our opinion, England's mission today is exactly the same as it was in previous centuries - Great Britain has set itself the task of protecting white people throughout the world, across the globe, and British colonial policy has indeed remained faithful to this mission to this day; I believe it is in the interest of all of Europe that this mission be preserved so that the living space that white people throughout Europe need in order to exist does not shrink, but is preserved for all time; this is a mission that Great Britain has had, and it is in the vital interest of all peoples that this mission be continued."
If you want me to continue, I absolutely can.
Hitler's goal in Europe was to give its peoples its freedoms while also seeing Germany as the leader of the continent - nothing about stripping other Europeans of their rights, and nothing about making Germany the sole ruler of Europe.
Let's also quote Alfred Rosenberg on the topic, specifically in his speech "Germany as a Bulwark in Eastern Europe":
"When we consider the problems of the East, we should by no means speak narrowly of Germany alone and its concerns, but understand that this global struggle is a European issue for all peoples, and that these peoples, who once broke away from the Bolshevik movement at a critical hour, somehow—despite the many difficulties that exist— still belong to Europe, and that they, often unconsciously, are also engaged in the struggle for Europe.
The National Socialist movement must also carry this realization with it so that it does not become petty and narrow-minded in the struggle for itself, and that it never forgets our venerable continent, its great culture, and its great past; this may reinforce that consciousness which has carried and strengthened us time and again from the very first days of our movement and has today become a glorious consciousness shared by all of us, by many millions."
@_Uscha A reminder that, when firefighters found him, Peiper was gripping a pistol and rifle in his hands, "as if defending himself."
He went down swinging.
@RandycWeaver Calvin University's German Propaganda Archive has some of his stuff translated, if you'd also like to read stuff there.
https://t.co/8Ig8OhQbl6
New upload to the Internet Archive:
"Fascism and its Practical Results" is a lecture given by Joseph Goebbels at the German Academy of Politics in 1933 where he describes the Italian state, Mussolini, and the practice of Fascism among the Italian people, ultimately arguing that it and National Socialism will shape the countries of Europe for all time.
Goebbels speaks excellently here and gives us the best idea of how the at-the-time new German state viewed its inspiration as not something to completely mimic, for all states are shaped by their unique peoples, but as a sign of things to come with the Italian and German Revolutions.
Read it here: https://t.co/geLnQsHBf0
As for Hess and Hitler, Hess heard Hitler speak in Munich in 1920 and joined the NSDAP on July 1st of that year, becoming its 16th member.
A reminder that Hess was already in right-wing circles at that time, including the Thule Society in 1918, meaning that him hearing about Hitler that early on and checking out a NSDAP meeting isn't completely unlikely.
The essay itself is from 1921, as stated by his official biography published in 1933, "Rudolf Hess - Der Stellvertreter Des Führers".
You can find the German source at this link, and the essay itself on page 9; I have also screenshotted the exact instance where he mentions Mussolini.
Internet Archive: https://t.co/pFBmA6xpod
Mussolini had already been elected to the Chamber of Deputies in May 1921, and the Italian Fascist Party was already gaining notice in nationalist circles in Germany (along with its paramilitary groups that fought communists in the streets), so its quite possible that Hess had heard of Mussolini by then.
If you have to go cheap, use a phone app like "Vflat Scan", as it can digitize older books without you having to damage the material by flattening pages, etc.
You could also try seeing if a library or university near you has a scanner and if you're allowed to use it for a period of time, they can help you with setting the system up.
In any case once you have a PDF, you can send it to me via something like "PDFHost" through DMs. DM me if you need any help in the process.
NSDAP politician Friedrich Schmidt describes the differences between the German Reich and the Anglo-Saxon British Empire (found in "The Reich as a Task", 1940):
"The Anglo-Saxon Empire, in its internal structure and in its external impact on the world, is a product of the last few centuries.
In the course of its development, the English Empire has become the visible embodiment of the will to dominate, and over the past hundred years, the Englishman has always gone wherever trade routes and lines of power intersected: in doing so, he was driven almost exclusively by the will to exercise his power—often unscrupulously to the very end—over peoples and continents through the possession of economically valuable territories and the control of the world’s most vital transportation hubs.
The mission of the British Empire, therefore, has always been to exercise domination, and this will to dominate permitted the use of all means, from the slave trade to Christian missionary work, as well as from moralizing hypocrisy to the most brutal murder.
Here we recognize the great distinction, for when the German went out into the world, he went where work and achievement awaited him; he wanted to set an example out in the world; he wanted to help and captivate others through his actions.
Thus, today’s German Reich is not an expression of the will to dominate, but—in accordance with the law inherent in the German people—an expression of the will to lead, that is, the will to convince others through example and role models, and to serve the purpose of creation through discipline and order, wherever that may be.
Seen in this light, the German Reich wants only one thing: it wants its achievements in all areas of life to serve as a model for the young, life-hungry peoples.
We Germans can do without any display of the most brutal violence in the world, because Adolf Hitler’s revolutionary idea creates such an abundance of tangible achievements that the young peoples of the European continent—and beyond, the world—will not be able to resist this German genius in the long run - thus, it is our German destiny in the world to be the educators of the peoples and the executors of a final divine mission."
Wanted to shoutout another translation project that parallels this one (but went on for far longer than mine so far).
The "Biblioteca Fascista" was a Blogspot translation effort to preserve and translate Italian Fascist works from 2012 to 2024; it has countless articles, books, papers, speeches, decrees, and other material in both English and Italian.
Sadly it seems as though the project ended in 2024 with no new updates since then, but what it had done up to that point is absolutely incredible.
Check it out; if nobody else does it who knows, I might make another Internet Archive account just to mirror everything there.
https://t.co/mMNcEAE9ne