Name1 Name2

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@whatshoood @kaizero_ainta Underrated comment.

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@Moritz__Gross @AnthropicAI Well, sure; but even if we assume it takes 200/million tokens or something silly, its still minuscule.

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@Moritz__Gross @AnthropicAI Pennies compared to the human energy required to progress it to this point.

31 million tokens is a few hundred dollars.

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@john_hersc79276 @bountyAIhunter @AnthropicAI You did it. I spit out my coffee. I hope you're happy.

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@KillaPresence @Highway_30 It was an excellent attempt at an ad-hominem attack, thank you very much.

It also doesn't need to cancel anything out, its an excellent illustration of the hypocrisy of the WBNA, as observed by how they're scrambling to now define 'what a woman is.'

Thanks Royce.

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@Brad_Libs @Highway_30 I'm flattered that you think I'm AI. But, you'll be disappointed to learn that I didn't have to break out the thesaurus :(. I thought: why limit myself to a vocabulary that forces more words for an idea than required.

That said: my bad. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@Brad_Libs @Highway_30 You can't even understand a simple example that illustrates the absurdity of your ideological position. Clearly, it doesn't comport with what you're authorized to think, but that doesn't detract from its value.

Its really quite brave of you to be calling anyone dumb.

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@KillaPresence @Highway_30 Ahh yes. Because surely none of the other men playing women's sports are grifting for unearned athletic valor.

It is genuinely amazing how myopic, and detached from reality you are.

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@LaneFranklane @GTBAGF @EdKrassen You are so perfect. Literally the exact behavior I pointed out to you, and you can't help yourself.

Thank you Frank. You are literally a caricature. Empty rhetoric, wrapped in a veil of indignation and unearned virtue.

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@LaneFranklane @GTBAGF @EdKrassen I gave you the point. And you slid into a scripted response of failure.

Point:
Royce's actions explicitly show the hypocrisy, and willfully-inconsistent ideology of the WBNA and the 'trans women are women' crowd.

What say you? Please, tell me I'm a bully again, or shout MAGA.

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@LaneFranklane @GTBAGF @EdKrassen Thanks. If nothing else, this tombstone emotional flailing you've constructed might serve as a cautionary warning to others.

Alas, poor Frank, he had no ideas that were his own, and no substance with which to articulate what he had co-opted from others.

But he was big offended.

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@LaneFranklane @GTBAGF @EdKrassen https://t.co/BTGIcvXZMT

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@LaneFranklane @GTBAGF @EdKrassen Assertions without argument. Keep going.

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@LaneFranklane @GTBAGF @EdKrassen Willfully misunderstanding and idea so you can avoid engaging it, is the hallmark of a retard and the most common respose of what passes for liberals these days. Royce's actions provide an explicit example of how the mantra of 'trans women are women's fails outright in practice.

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@LaneFranklane @GTBAGF @EdKrassen Always willful misunderstanding as an excuse to avoid engageling the actual argument. Its not clever, are youre not making an argument.

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@LaneFranklane @GTBAGF @EdKrassen Way to side step. Your inability to hold more than one thought at a time is not evidence that the rest of us should take you seriously. Nor is it a reason to base our behavior on your willful misunderstanding of basic concepts.

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@LaneFranklane @GTBAGF @EdKrassen Please, extend this argument to everything you post on: if it doesn't personally affect you, don't talk about it. Of course you won't, because you know its a disingenuous (and objectively foolish) idea. I'm sure it sounded clever when you wrote it though.

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@niuniu_dev @signulll Seems smart. If they want a car they can save for it. The built in assumption that every teenager needs to be given a car is nuts.

[Name1 Name2 @Name1Name220]

@ZackKorman This is honestly a good idea in a world of naive/ over-eager agents. Instead of turning rejection into an adversarial challenge, you give actionable feedback regarding an incorrect action.