Ten years ago your wife was murdered by a deranged man. Ten years later you've built a career on her grave, using her death to silence anyone who disagrees with you. That is not grief. That is industry.
You claim "far right extremism" is the threat. Yet in those same ten years, thousands of British children were raped by grooming gangs your party protected. A Sudanese migrant attempted beheading in Belfast. Churches burned. Synagogues attacked. Not by the "far right." By the imports you cheered.
You fear "democracy at risk" because people vote differently. You fear "social cohesion" because working-class communities object to their daughters being collateral damage. You fear algorithms because they let people speak without your permission.
You don't mourn your wife, Brendan. You monetize her. You weaponize her. You wave her memory like a censor's badge to shut down debate, to protect the rapists your party imported, to demonize the parents who actually tried to protect their children.
You have no morals. You have a brand. And that brand is built on the one tragedy that gives you immunity from criticism. How convenient. How profitable. How utterly, irredeemably vile.
Our world is at risk because of men like you. Men who import danger, then blame those who notice. Men who sacrifice children to prove their tolerance. Men who would rather police language than protect lives.
Keep writing your columns. Keep cashing your cheques. The rest of us will keep counting the bodies your compassion created.
En pleine affaire Henry Nowak, le compte @W_L_M__U_K diffuse cette vidéo dont aucun média ne s'est fait l'écho. On y voit des policiers britanniques manquant de tuer un adolescent de 15 ans en lui écrasant la tête contre une clôture à pointes.
Au lieu de recevoir des soins immédiats, le jeune Rocco, qui se vide de son sang après avoir été empalé, est retenu et emmené de force. La blessure aurait pourtant pu lui être fatale. On entend d'ailleurs le garçon dire à la police : « Je ne veux pas mourir ».
Mais Rocco est blanc, tout comme Henry l'était, alors tous les médias s'en foutent.
UK: England already arrests up to 14,000 people a year over social media posts, & the new digital ID rules could push that 10X higher. Free nations do not jail citizens for typing. Britain is a police state.
Young Bob is fresh out of the hospital after being publicly attacked by foreigners earlier today.
I didn’t know who he was before, but I am definitely paying attention to him now.
He says today has encouraged him to get out more.
Charlie Kirk would be proud!
The Epstein Class at it's finest: if you don't agree with this 'under 16s ban' then you're defending pedophiles and groomers online.
Coming from a literal pedophile protector... Mandelson and Saville come to mind.
Look at this little rat scumbag - he can't even hide his glee. The face, the laugh, the inner demon is on full display for everyone to see. He is absolutely loving every single second of selling you out.
This has absolutely nothing to do with protecting children and everything to do with total, calculated control. The 'save the kids' narrative was always the bait; the real prize is absolute surveillance and the total destruction of an adult's right to a privat life.
Worse than that; the sheep have signed us up for a real time, real world panopticon. It is not just online anymore - it is the physical rollout of automated 'social credit scores,' mandatory digital IDs, total biometric surveillance, and state-enforced behaviour management. They have handed this regime the keys to track your wallet, your movement, and your mind, ushering in a brutal era of dystopian control where stepping out of line means being deleted from society with a single keystroke.
First step: they are stripping away online anonymity so they can harvest, track, and log every single move you make. Why else do you think they are aggressively building massive data centres across the country? It's not to host gaming servers - it's the storage infrastructure for a 24/7 wireless digital dragnet.
It never has been, and never will be, about the children.
While you are forced to submit facial biometrics and digital IDs just to open an app, MPs, Lords, civil servants and government allies will inevitably be exempt from having their phones screened and monitored. Rules for thee, but never for them.
Well done, Britain. You had a golden opportunity to see through the 'save the children' lie and stop this dystopian lockdown in its tracks. Instead, you were far too busy falling for fake 'movements' designed to distract and divide, and sleepwalking straight into a digital cage.
You stripped us ALL of our privacy, anonymity and freedoms and now you have exactly the totalitarian state you deserve. Enjoy the surveillance.
So Starmers UKRAINIAN Rent boy trial has finished and SURPRISE SURPRISE it's a total cover up.
It was those big bad RUSSIANS again
What a load of sh*t
No-one has explained why the accused had profiles on GRindr.
Why would Russia pay inexperienced rent boys to hurt our PM when they have agents that can do it? Makes no sense.
I reckon Starmer didn't pay up.
UTTER BULLSHIT
UK officials threaten to jail Elon Musk for up to two years without appeal for criticizing Starmer’s open borders, grooming gangs, and riots.
This is pure tyranny.
Musk tells the truth they hate.
Starmer’s Britain is a police state.
Free speech is dead under Labour.
Fight back. 🇬🇧
(images courtesy of @Xmusknewsx)
This evening the entire machinery of the British mainstream press is trying to convince us that Vladimir Putin attacked the UK by asking a couple of foreign lads to set fire to a car and a house that he mistakenly believed to still be owned by @Keir_Starmer
The government have had a year to devise a plausible cover story to explain why a couple of pyromaniac botty boys with a box of matches got a bit firey with Starmer and this is the best they can come up with.
Oh, Paul. Still shouting into the mirror, I see. Still mistaking your reflection for the enemy.
You claim "fascists" want to fill children's brains with racism? You're the one demanding digital ID, state-controlled speech, and algorithmic censorship. You're the one who wants to decide what children can read, watch, and think. You're the one who labels dissent as "fascism" to justify silencing it.
That's not anti-fascism, Paul. That's just fascism with a thesaurus.
You spent years at the BBC learning how to package state narrative as "impartiality." Now you spend your days on Musk's platform decrying "fascists" while cheering every government attempt to control information. The contradiction would be embarrassing if you had any shame left.
We don't want to hear you shouting into the mirror, Paul. The fascist you're warning about is the one staring back at you. Keep projecting. The projection is the only truth you have left.
🚨 THE POLICE ARE KEEPING RECORDS ON PEOPLE WHO COMMITTED NO CRIME
Not violence.
Not threats.
Not criminal acts.
Speech.
A warning was raised in Parliament that people could have information recorded against them for comments deemed to go beyond "legitimate discussion" of Islam.
The obvious question is:
Who decides what is "legitimate"?
Because once free speech depends on official approval...
It isn't really free speech anymore.
JUDGE LORD JUSTICE TIMOTHY HOLROYDE
This is the judge who REFUSED Lucy Connolly her appeal after she was convicted for a social media post.
Meanwhile this very same judge CUT the sentence of Labour's Lord Ahmed by THREE YEARS after he was convicted of child sex offences. His sentence was reduced to just two and a half years from five and half years.