Novak Djokovic rewrites history:
"I think that with the level of play I had in my victory [at the Australian Open] against Alcaraz, I would have had a good chance of winning against Zverev in the SF, and then vs Sinner in the final."
Do you agree?
(via @Vijestime)
@DjokerNole Only underscores my op-ed (https://t.co/Ium6f6C2Xu), at the height of the '22 Australian saga: "... confident ... Djokovic will ... cement his status as the greatest tennis player of all time, ... to fulfill the goal for which he was sucked "Down Under" this month." IDEMO w/Love!
@DjokerNole Dear Nole! Thank you so much for your emotional universal message, which transcends age, gender, race, and nationality! As a die-hard fan (see photo-op from Tel Aviv Watergen '22) -- was super elated to watch you win the Olympic title and capture the well-deserved Golden Slam.
@CristinaNcl Absolutely!!! Such poetic justice... The oldest olympic tennis champion and golden slam winner. And accomplishing all that on "one leg", literally... Just *love* this guy immensely!!! 🎾🥇🤎🙏
'I feel like I'm playing better & moving better than when I did at Wimbledon. Hopefully I'll come out on the court play my best tennis & in a way nothing to lose as I've already secured a medal so I'm gonna go for it'
Novak Djokovic
As if FDR's VP would have boycotted Churchill's address to Congress while Britain was spearheading the war of sparing the free world from Nazi Germany. Unthinkable!!!
As if FDR's VP would have boycotted Churchill's address to Congress while Britain was spearheading the war of sparing the free world from Nazi Germany. Unthinkable!!!
אם היה ראש ממשלה חזק ורציני כמו שרון, ולא כמו אדונך החלש והרופס, לא היינו מגיעים לקטסטרופה אליה הובילה קונספציית הפרוטקשן של נתניהו.
זו תוצאה ישירה של 14 שנות חולשה של נתניהו, שלא רק הכיל את הטרור, אלא גם מימן אותו בסכומי עתק, ועוד סיפר לנו מעשיות על "החמאס המורתע".
ינון, לא מביך אותך לדברר ללא הרף את המחדל? אתה לא מסוגל לבטא איזו עמדה עצמאית ��לא דף מסרים?
.@Harvard President Lowell set quotas for Jews in the 1920s. The difference then is that there was a national uproar against antisemitism in response. That led to the development of today’s admission policies, which consider a much broader array of factors than just academic merit.
While I am supportive of considering a broad array of factors in selecting candidates for admission, we have likely gone too far away from merit based selection.
The pendulum has swung too far in large part due to the ideology of the DEI movement. Candidates deemed ‘oppressed’ are massively advantaged in the process versus those deemed the ‘oppressors.’
This is a crazy rubric as it advantages the daughter of the billionaire of color who went to Exeter over a poor white boy from Mississippi from a single parent family who was educated in a single-room school house and scored 1,600 on his SATs.