Diving deep into the world of AI, gadgets, and emerging software. Always curious about how things work and what the future looks like. 🚀 Tech enthusiast & life
ANDREJ KARPATHY SHIPPED A REPO THAT OPTIMIZES ANY TRADING STRATEGY.
autoresearch.
the agent edits the code, runs it, keeps what improves the metric, reverts what doesn't, and repeats while you sleep.
why it applies for trading:
→ you don't write code, you write program.md: what to explore, what must never change, when to stop
→ every run is scored by one number, so the loop needs no human judgment
→ improvements get committed to git, failures get reverted, and you wake up to the diff
→ Shopify's CEO pointed it at their templating engine and got 53% faster rendering from 93 automated commits
→ the pattern is domain-agnostic. if you can run a command and get a number, it works
Your backtest returns a number. That's the whole requirement.
Grab it 👇
there's one ai-crypto stack that's actually delivering verifiable inference on solana validators rn and it's not the flashy agent tokens self-hosted models + zkml proofs keeping outputs tamper-proof at ~12ms latency how's that changing your infra bets? 🧠
Claude just got humiliated by a tiger rug.
The same prompt asked Kimi K3 and Claude Fable 5 to turn an embroidered tiger into a living animal. Kimi keeps the rug, the stage and the transformation coherent while the tiger slowly claws its way out of the fabric.
Claude gets a decent tiger, but the moment the prompt becomes more structured, the scene starts collapsing into blur, random motion and missing details.
This is obviously one cherry-picked comparison, not a scientific benchmark. But it exposes something more important than raw image quality: control. A powerful model is useless if every extra instruction makes the result less predictable.
Kimi K3 did not just generate a prettier tiger here. It understood the sequence, preserved the visual logic and made the transformation feel intentional.
The next AI race will not be about which model can generate the most impressive frame. It will be about which one can actually follow the director.
ngl your data never actually disappeared after that one check. still sitting in brokers, still getting sold. serus actually scrubs it if you finally commit. dont half ass privacy tbh 🧠
A 24-YEAR-OLD MADE $31,500 LAST MONTH FROM A FITNESS INFLUENCER WHO DOESN'T EXIST. SHE'S NEVER TOUCHED A REAL DUMBBELL.
$0 in filming. 5 brands paying per video. and the reason it works is that she never stops moving.
every AI girl page dies the same way: the face drifts. put her in a still, front-facing clip and frame to frame the jaw shifts, the eyes wander, the brain screams "fake." it's the one flaw nobody fully solves.
so he never gave the face a quiet frame to fail in.
he put her in a gym.
gym content is pure motion. a POV selfie mid-set - the arm blurs past the lens, the ponytail swings, sweat, bad overhead lighting. nobody studies a still face for 8 seconds. they watch a body move. the drift that kills every other page dissolves into the movement. the workout feeds the algorithm. the motion protects the render.
and motion doesn't just hide the flaw. it changes who pays.
she's not begging $12.99 subs off strangers. she's landing brand deals - activewear, a pre-workout, a shaker bottle - because a page that ships flawless clips every single day, never flakes, never reshoots, never raises its rate is every brand's dream creator.
the setup:
→ one locked character sheet: same face, same body, same gym, every clip
→ short POV gym clips every few hours. free. built for the rewatch
→ the whole batch renders overnight on one mac mini on his desk. offline. no cloud. he wakes up to it done
→ brands land in the dms. ~$900 a video, sometimes a 10-clip campaign
the numbers:
month 1: posting daily. one $400 test deal. barely broke even.
month 3: 3 brands on repeat. ~$9,000.
month 6: 5 brands, two on retainer. $31,500. his best month yet.
videos he actually filmed: 0.
the catch nobody posts: $31,500 was a peak, not a floor - normal months run $12-18 k, and month 1 pays almost nothing while the page hunts for views. brands want AI creators labeled now - run her as a "real girl" and one exposure thread ends the contract and the income with it. and "put her in motion" stops being clever the week the tool that fixes faces ships. the trick has a shelf life.
not a single brand ever asked to see her lift.
the lesson isn't "make a gym girl."
it's: stop fighting the flaw everyone fights. build her in the one place it can't show.
$CATE
179k mc cat coin riding the robinhood listing narrative rn, tied to that push going around feline meme circles
holder bag is fat af tho, decent pump potential if the listing stays hot but that concentration is sketchy
don't ape the top fr
0x92c064de7701a32de786af181eb4c6cbc19b1dcc
https://t.co/IdsuYmEn5H
Buy : https://t.co/Bp9m4IVedE
$WORM
named after that whole "elon is physiologically a worm" bit, pink earthworm logo and everything. basically a meme built around poking at his biology as lumbricus terrestris. kinda unhinged, kinda funny, the kind of narrative that spreads if the right people grab it.
could be worth waiting for a dip before sizing in imo, no need to chase.
dyor and manage your own risk.
CA: DPCDdMEuk7ukHx1BFzmMMTvJGZnzcC2jFdSqwdMcpump
https://t.co/586rfK0Hua
I just bought $ANSEM for the first time ever.
It's held up amazingly well and looks like this could be its floor.
One thing I've realised is that the Solana community is pretty loyal to its key figures, and I respect that.
I'm nowhere near a whale holder. I did it more out of respect and to be a part of the journey if it smashes through the billions.
🐂 @blknoiz06
before you ship on solana's alpenglow: verify the new consensus gossip layer isn't just a fancy rewrite with the same validator concentration. top 20 still control ~60% stake last i checked 🧠 how's the block propagation architecture holding up under real spam tho?
A TRADER CONNECTED CLAUDE TO 3 YEARS OF HIS OWN TRADES.
Now every setup gets checked before he clicks Buy.
Every trade records:
→ setup
→ market regime
→ emotional state
→ outcome
Claude compares the current chart against his entire history.
Not the market.
His history.
Sometimes the best trade isn't the one you find.
It's the one your own data tells you to skip.
The journal stops collecting trades.
It starts preventing bad ones.
Bookmark this before your biggest edge becomes pattern recognition instead of prediction.
back when i started id see a16z paradigm polychain and instantly ape. now im way more skeptical tbh 1. actual backers behind the wallets 2. real funding flows 3. gaming narrative signals alpha wire surfaces it before the timeline does 🧠
Happy new year y'all
I appreciate everyone one of you that's been with me in this space.
Looking forward to meeting more cool peeps
Let's work harder this year
GM y'all
Free is the part people are underpricing.
Google just made Gemini 3.6 Flash the new default.
Not a toy model hiding in a free tier.
A near-frontier coding model normal users can try in Gemini and AI Studio without touching enterprise pricing.
This is landing while people compare paid frontier APIs:
> GPT-5.6 Sol at $5/$30
> Claude Sonnet 5 at $3/$15
> Grok 4.5 at $2/$6
> Gemini 3.5 Flash at $1.50/$9
Benchmarks matter.
But a model people can actually use for free changes behavior faster than a model they only admire from pricing tables.
that elon snail named gary from the old ted talk about speeding up the boring company tunnels is what pulled me into $gary. sitting at 78k mc with 14 smart wallets already positioned. narrative feels like a random musk lore play worth tracking quietly.
0xf0430bd971ee4a63674a2103e21129e9ccf29686
https://t.co/TvaLR8WV4H
everyone talks about securing seeds on steel plates. the real leak is your clipboard manager caching the key in a local sqlite db in plaintext. curious how many devs here actually blacklist their terminal from clipboard history