X is a conspiracy theory
X is outgroup propaganda
X is technically correct, but it's false in spirit
X is true, but why are you so obsessed with it?
X is good actually
Opposing X makes you a bad ingrouper
@CarlZha@SpencerHakimian The US government is ready to sacrifice around 0.5mil. The other government in charge of the US is ready to sacrifice all of them.
The most reliable way to arrive at truth is that societies who understand warfare better conquer those who don't.
Certainly not efficient by any stretch, but all peace-time truth finding mechanics are highjackable at the moment.
Men do things for one of 4 reasons
a) money
b) women
c) ideology
d) mental illness
The best soldiers are the ideology types
The best politicians are the women types
The best intellectuals are the money types
The best engineers are the mental illness types
unpopular opinion:
first off this whole idea of using analog circuits to accelerate ai workloads aint exactly new. ibm intel and others have been experimenting with that shit for years tryna leverage the noise tolerance of neural nets to boost efficiency
heres the thing analog design is fucking hard like orders of magnitude harder than your garden variety digital vlsi weโre talking about mixed signal nightmares nonlinear gremlins device level fuckery its not the kind of thing you can just do
even if you can assemble an avengers level team of analog autists theres still the pesky problem of yield and variability when youre playing in the world of stochastic circuits every chip is a special snowflake no two are alike and getting them to all sing in harmony is a sisyphean task
and dont even get me started on the design verification and testing, traditional verilog simulations aint gonna cut it when your transistors are flirting with the heisenberg uncertainty principle. weโre talking about whole new eda flows and methodologies that havent even been invented yet
but even if you can get that working in a lab setting scaling it to production is a whole nother beast. youโre talking about building a whole new stack from the transistors up and competing with the economies of scale and decades of optimization of digital silicon
good fucking luck with that
it is pretty fucking sus that extropic doesnt have any public software sims or benchmarks like what kind of hardware company doesnt start with a virtual prototype especially when youre claiming to have some revolutionary new architecture thats like rule number one of hardware development my dude
simulate before you fabricate, its not rocket surgery its basic fucking due diligence
and dont even get me started on the superconducting josephson junction crap sure you might be able to eek out some gains in a liquid nitrogen cooled dilution fridge but the moment you try to package that up for mass market youre gonna be in a world of hurt. cryogenic cooling aint exactly consumer friendly last i checked
and then theres the question of whether any of this sampling speedup even matters. sure monte carlo methods are a big part of ml these days from diffusion models to boltzmann machines but is the bottleneck really in the prng??? is that really whats holding us back from agi??
color me skeptical my dude
seems to me like extropic is just tryna carve out a niche with some esoteric fringe approaches and praying they can ride the hype train long enough to justify their valuation
but sure go off kings dilate that overton window of whats possible just dont be surprised when reality comes knocking and the music stops
may the schottky be with you
We need Kardashev-I-grade civilizational infrastructure for governance of AI :
-- no humans in the loop
-- operates in near-realtime
-- mathematical proof of optimal governance decisions (in expectation)
-- no core dependency on the legacy legal system
-- onchain proof of compliance
-- anyone can become a stakeholder/voter
I love that "the media lies, but only to make it seem worse than it is" is a point in favor of "everything going well"
Isn't a narrative a fact of the world? Isn't the idea of bad media disconnected from reality a concern? Nope, just another bunch of words that mean nothing
AMERICA IS NOT IN RAPID DECLINE
AMERICA IS RICHER AND SAFER THAN EVER BEFORE
The problem is that, outside of your immediate surroundings, your reality is actually a hallucinatory bubble constructed by news and media narratives, and those narratives are full of doom and anger
The "R" in RCT is completely unnecessary. Randomization does not guarantee equal treatment and control, it just converges to it with higher probability as sample size increases, assuming a bunch of stuff .
You can get better performance just by manually dividing the two groups
If you actually measure the core variables of many famous studies (age, gender, social stuff), you might be surprised how skewed the T and C frequently are in practice.