@DavidKe40061894 @nailsada6@kenneth02829878@paulmurphy_TD No, I follow reputable virologists and epidemiologists, and see what the consensus is based on studies. Social media can be a tool to spread information or misinformation, but a peer-reviewed study is a better source than Brietbart.
@ReluctantlyDem@JoeSaysStuff@Read_Read227 @MichaelGemar @ATBollands @NoahFinneburgh Such as telling the NFL to fire people for kneeling?
Or prohibiting businesses from requiring vaccinations?
Or arresting people who may have Communist sympathies?
Or condemning academics whi critisize Israel?
Would any of that be cancel culture?
@nailsada6@kenneth02829878@paulmurphy_TD I have a 140 character limit, and I made the mistake of assuming you had enough basic intelligence to understand the difference between asserting aomething without evidence and asserting it with evidence.
What makes experts unreliable? Don't you go to a doctor if you're sick?
@nailsada6@kenneth02829878@paulmurphy_TD I never denied such! I said you shouldn't believe something just because it's on Facebook. If it's a link to a peer-reviewed study, sure look into it.
@GretchenBowma12@luapskid @equaleyes1 @joncoopertweets You're almost getting it.
Maybe we shouldn't have representation based on map lines, but rather just based on populations.
@jlollar77@BrooklynBalmer@joncoopertweets We understand what the point is. We are saying it doesn't make sense for representation to be based on map lines rather than population.
The point of the Senate was for slave states to not be underrepresented. Look it up.
@nailsada6@kenneth02829878@paulmurphy_TD Seeing a posy on FB, Twitter, whatever that is linked to peer-reviewed sources is reliable. Facebook or Twitter themselves aren't reliable. Your grandmother reposting a story of how Bill Gates is putting chips in vaccines shouldn't be taken seriously