I’m back and excited to share Maximum Frequency Ventures inaugural $50m fund with the world. MFV was built as an evolution to venture capital in crypto. CT is quick to dunk on VCs, often rightfully so, but venture capital remains still one of the strongest forces for good in this industry.
@moshaikh@alextang@jerome_ and I built MFV as a vehicle designed to support founders to build generational companies while we remain in the trenches with them.
Supporting builders was the best part of working at Aptos - seeing hungry founders grind and win. We cultivated 200+ projects with a collective $150m raised across them. Those experiences taught us what great founders need and where VC often falls short.
That realization led us here. We’re a VC that spends more time building than investing. Rolling up our sleeves is the foundation for this venture.
Our team came together naturally as we saw ~90% of the collective business outcomes at Aptos. From the biggest partnerships to ecosystem-defining deals, we’ve lived the highs and lows of scaling in real time and we’ll bring that same experience to every company we invest in.
The timing couldn’t be better. The next wave of crypto demands builders who can execute with precision, resilience, and speed. We’re ready to match that energy.
It’s time for VCs to build. MFV will be in the trenches. See you there.
.@moshaikh, the cofounder of the well-known blockchain development company Aptos Labs, announced that he and three former colleagues had raised $50 million for a new venture fund, Maximum Frequency Ventures, focused on crypto companies. https://t.co/T48enysU6S
This is super interesting - how many papers / PDFs have been published waiting for a billion dollar market to be formed through those novel ideas?
Probably a few sleeping giants on @arxiv
My thoughts on the a16z crypto -> frontier pivot:
Crypto stopped being the core product a while ago. Today it works best as a feature set that makes other products better, particularly in financial services and money movement.
This makes sense and will lead to better products.
Speculation is an underappreciated bootstrap mechanism that can lead to the adoption of new types of products.
Even if a new market or product looks like speculation, history shows that speculative manias often fund and accelerate systems that later become indispensable:
- Tulip bulbs funded Dutch capital markets
- Railroad stock bubbles built the rails
- The dot-com frenzy built the internet backbone
And most recently, crypto’s speculation has led to the building of rails of a borderless, programmable financial system that financial institutions and governments are starting to rely on
MAYBE I WAS WRONG ABOUT BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY
I wrote about how I always used to make fun of the guys who said things like "Bitcoin is speculative, but the underlying blockchain technology is interesting." And now I think maybe they kinda had a point.
Thoughts on AGI and why we haven't achieved it yet...
A simple heuristic I’ve been using to test this hypothesis is asking frontier LLMs to name five things incorrect with something otherwise perfect that the same LLM drafted- without failure it always caves to the ask and provides five 'imperfections'
There are many reasons why the LLM may do this but the most important is that it lacks contextual awareness to push back on irrational (but otherwise basic) requests
There might be future models built that have better situational awareness, emotional awareness and the slightest dose of agency to tell the prompter their request isn't rational or even a waste of tokens.
My new mental model on how I would sort crypto in four main buckets today:
1. Money → stablecoins
2. Assets → tokenization
3. Markets → onchain finance + prediction markets
4. Machines → AI x crypto
Am I missing anything else?