Parafrasando Simone Weil : Bisogna dare espressione ad un nuovo linguaggio politico per rispecchiare i veri bisogni morali e fisici dei membri della società, una società che sia organizzata a misura d’uomo. Un collettivo non è un pensiero collettivo!
@LaSintesiItalia@LaSintesiItalia Non mi stupirebbe scoprire che Monica Pasquino è una di quelle sfigate pericolose che vogliono indottrinare i bambini sul "nato nel corpo sbagliato", il concetto più omofobo della storia.
@angelacorso8ac@angelacorso8ac Quando gli standard internazionali prevedono di indottrinare i bambini sulla balla che si può nascere nel corpo sbaglito uscire dagli standard internazionali è buono e giusto. Se moderno è buttarsi dal dirupo meglio il meno moderno.
Palestinian students at UNRWA schools:
“Stabbing Jews brings dignity to the Palestinians. We have to stab the Jews. They teach us that Jews are terrorists. I am ready to stab a jew and drive a car over them. I am ready to join ISIS.”
Does this seem like a normal society to you?
Hampstead Ponds is an interesting illustrating of the extent of the demands of trans activists.
There was already a mixed pond. Trans people could use it in safety & without having to 'out' themselves. But it wasn't enough. Why not?
@InconnuStudioIT @UnknownStudioIT le critiche alla Satrapi non hanno senso. Come in tutte le rivoluzioni sai cosa distruggi ma non cosa creerai e i rivoluzionari si scannano tra di loro.
Ma mettiamo i puntini sulle i: lo Scià M.R.Pahlavi era si un modernizzatore ma anche un dittatore sanguiario.
The GRA allows sex offenders to apply for a GRC. And GC women tell you that this is a good law or that you cannot change it anyway. If you still give them money and support, more fool you.
I'm adding a new feature to my newsletter. It's called "Who can we thank?" - a section in which I put the name and face to nameless, faceless bureaucrats (national/EU) who made a significant contributions to the eradication of women's rights in Europe.
Send me tips if you have any favourites! The more secretive and squirrelly, the better. Here's one to start:
Susanne Knoefel, Head of Unit at JUST D.1 on Non-Discrimination: LGBTIQ+, Age, Horizontal Issues.
I'll be writing more about Susanne in next week's news.
Gender has a clear definition in the Istanbul Convention. Other than that, all the GC lobby refuses to even discuss the meaning of gender. No debate is not just a TRA strategy.
“L’islamizzazione dell'Europa sarà pacifica. Ci basta infiltrare consigli municipali, assemblee nazionali, parlamento UE, per impadronirci del potere. Allora diffonderemo il messaggio di Allah. È la nostra strategia” A. Lasfar, Fratelli Musulmani francesi.
@BeaLorenzin@BeaLorenzin mi chiedo perchè avete tanta paura del consenso informato, di far sapere cosa viene insegnato ai minorenni?
Sento odore di bruciato e viene dalle vostre code di paglia.
Dopo la censura a #erriduca da parte dei magnaccia del Salerno Letteratura festival, Paolo Flores D'Arcais e Roberto Cotroneo si sono ritirati dall'appecoronato evento. Alle loro, oggi si sono aggiunte altre due schiene dritte: Stefano Bartezzaghi e Marco Lodoli. Grazie.
Single-sex services for women are disappearing in Europe. Here's how it's being done:
There are two main ways via which single-sex spaces and services are slowly going extinct in Europe. The first one is, obviously, by allowing anyone to identify as the opposite sex. Once a male person is in a female-only space, let’s say a youth hostel dorm room for example, it is no longer a women-only dorm room. It is a mixed-sex dorm room. He may have had his nads removed, or he may even be wearing a dress covered in flowers. It is a mixed-sex dorm room once both males and females are allowed to sleep in it.
If you tried to get such a man out of the room, and return it to its status as a women-only space, you would be accused of discrimination against him on the basis of his gender identity (though depending on your legal jurisdiction, which in turn depends on the speed at which your country’s equality legislation is being transed, this may still be called discrimination on the basis of “gender” or even sex-via-gender reassignment, even if the “reassignment” involves nothing more than the flowery dress).
If a company, or service of any kind, tries to maintain a single-sex policy, they will likely have to battle it out in court as soon as a disgruntled transvestite sniffs out their heresy. And so in order to avoid being dragged to court by such men (and such women), companies and services are pre-empting legal action by just making everything mixed-sex, like the Germans are planning to do in new building regulations. Problem solved.
And while the end of women-only yoga classes might not bother you that much, there are some services that really (really really) need to remain sex-based, and they are underpinned by the same equality laws that are currently under threat.
First a little background: equal treatment laws are mandatory in EU countries. I can’t refuse to sell a man an ice cream from my ice cream van, just because he’s a man. You can’t refuse to polish a woman’s Fabergé egg because you only polish men’s Fabergé eggs.
Except, and this is crucial, sometimes you can discriminate on the basis of someone’s sex. And I bet you can guess what those circumstances are. It must be, as the TERF Islanders put it: “a proportionate means to achieve a legitimate aim”. This teeny tiny caveat, variously worded, carries the weight of women’s safety and dignity in public spaces and services in European countries. You can deny a man access to a women’s prison or rape crisis centre, and you can refuse to hire a man for a job in (for example) a residential care home if that job involves washing the intimate parts of delirious old ladies or intellectually disabled children (whose families can request female-only intimate care).
Do you know why a family of an old checked-out woman might wish for their mother’s genitals be tended to by someone female? You bet you do. Not All Men yadda yadda yadda. Save it for yer wife. Enough men are . that even gender-equal Scandinavian utopias can legally advertise for those jobs for women only. And men also have the right, for privacy reasons, to wish only to have men tend to their bits. And that’s utterly reasonable.
But by expanding equality protections to include men masquerading as women and vice-versa, the burden is on the management of such facilities to justify why they are excluding variously-identified people. The only country that has gone to court to establish in law that sex refers to biology, not identity, is the UK, but service providers eager to please noisy activists are ignoring it, leading to a bit of a crisis. Oh you’ve not read about this major policy issue in the newspaper, or seen a debate about it on the news? That’s not an accident.
Men stayed out of women’s spaces because both society and the law punished them if they did not. That norm is disappearing, and the law is disappearing — or being tortuously reinterpreted into nothingness — along with it.
Me and receipts, as you know. Meanwhile Foran has just published an article on the FES judgment where the words deeming provision never appear. I bet he has also erased them from his book. But the internet never forgets.
@EwanBen@EwanBen In reality, they are homophobic because of Allah.Muslims are so obsessed with women and sex that a percentage of them engage in homosexual sex, but using children to vent bestial instincts or having a special friend whose throat you then slit is not a sin in Allah's eyes
@vanabeau Per non alimentare l'islamofobia o la terroristofobia immagino.
Come se la paura dell'islam e dei terroristi fosse una fobia e non una reltà!