CLAUDE + YouTube = $$$$
CLAUDE + YouTube = $$$$
CLAUDE + YouTube = $$$$
No degree. No camera. No editing skills.
Even a 15-year-old can do this.
I'm going to show you exactly how.
9 prompts that print money on YouTube 👇
🚨 BREAKING: Research just got 10x faster.
Claude can now break down dozens of academic papers into structured insights like a Stanford-level researcher.
Use these 9 prompts to skip the overwhelm and get straight to clarity.👇
Bookmark this you’ll need it.🔖
Anthropic just dropped a 31-page prompting guide.
Here's everything you actually need (in 10 rules):
1. You write "review this contract" and pray.
Fix: Name every output. "Review this contract. Flag risks per clause. Rate severity 1-5. Return as a table."
2: You say "summarize this" on a 40-page report.
Fix: 4.8 sizes the answer to the input. Cap it: "5 bullets. Each under 15 words. Start each with an action verb."
3: You write "don't use jargon. don't be salesy."
Fix: Negative instructions don't stick.
Flip them: "Write in plain English a 16-year-old could read aloud."
4: You type "can you help me with the email?"
Fix: Each verb ships something. For example: "Go to Gmail. Find [contact]. Write the send-ready reply. Under 90 words. Tone: confident, casual."
5: You wait for Claude to web search on its own.
Fix: Claude opus 4.8 calls fewer tools than 4.6.
Force it: "Use web search aggressively. Verify every claim with at least 2 sources."
6: You miss the warm tone from old Claude.
Fix: Claude opus 4.8 is direct. Almost zero emojis. Paste 2-3 sentences in the voice you want.
Tell Claude to match the rhythm.
7: You ask for "a landing page" & get bare minimum.
Fix: Drop this one line on every creative task
→ "Go beyond the basics."
It's from Anthropic's own doc.
8: You forget Claude 4.8 doesn't reason by default.
Fix: They call it "Thinking." Effort: High
Add this at the end: "Think before answering (maximum reasoning)." Free upgrade. Every time.
9: You rewrite the same prompt 14 times a week.
Fix: A skill is a command with instructions pre-built.
Write the same prompt twice? Make it a skill.
10: You assume Claude knows what you meant.
Fix: Old Claude 4.6 guessed.
New Claude 4.8 does exactly what you typed.
Spell it out. Output. Order. Length. Tone. Format.
If you don't say it, you don't get it.
To go even further & download my .md files directly:
Step 1. Go to https://t.co/psB7XxAv8w.
Step 2. Subscribe for free. Don't pay anything.
Step 3. Open my welcome email (most skip this).
Step 4. Hit the automatic reply button inside.
Step 5. Download my .md files from my Notion.
Bonus. Enjoy my best copy-paste prompts, too.
Eric Schmidt (ex-Google CEO): “if you really want to make money, it’s actually easy. found an agentic AI company.”
If I had only 30 days to do that , I'd begin here and save this:
Agent Architecture
https://t.co/Xyy3e9AjAQ
Claude Code 101:
https://t.co/tZbHeRDWkj
Claude Code in Action:
https://t.co/RDYEVbydhW
Prompt engineering (official):
https://t.co/aYQzAWmObh
Interactive prompt tutorial (hands-on):
https://t.co/5k9My0hYgY
CLAUDE.md & how to give Claude memory:
https://t.co/gtmOGKAvDe
Skills, teach Claude reusable workflows:
https://t.co/DJFqh3E6OB
MCP, time connect Claude to Slack, GitHub, Drive:
https://t.co/XbRdmmcYmP
Routines (automate tasks 24/7):
https://t.co/LGbhOeWWdJ
Claude Code Ultimate Guide (community):
https://t.co/56DAmEuqH8
Awesome Claude Code (skills, hooks, plugins):
https://t.co/jUIBuxvV5K
All 13 Anthropic Academy courses (free certs):
https://t.co/rHn0gDmtGH
Claude Code full docs:
https://t.co/KYHnapDdHG
All of this is for free at $0/month
Then read this guide by this builder
THIS WALLET STACKED $230K ON BTC UP/DOWN BETS. THE BLUEPRINT TO AUTOMATE THE SAME EDGE WITH CLAUDE
The wallet is https://t.co/kyZC2FFQ43
$230K all-time, every position a Bitcoin or Ethereum Up or Down market
It never guesses direction. It enters only when the math and the market disagree
THE STRATEGY:
BTC moves are not fully random. When the market enters a committed directional state, continuation is measurable. That is Markov persistence
Entry signal:
> Δ = p̂ − q ≥ ε
Model probability minus market price. Enter only on a 5% gap or more
Persistence filter:
> p(j*,j*) ≥ 0.87
Only trade states with 0.87 persistence or higher. Below that, skip. This is what holds the win rate above 65% with zero directional guessing
Payout:
> r = (1 − q) / q
At q = 0.647 that is +54.5% a win. At q = 0.441, +126.7%. Lower entry price, bigger asymmetry
Sizing:
> f* = p − (1−p)/b
Kelly. At p = 0.87, b = 0.647, f* ≈ 0.71. Size to the edge, never to gut
HOW TO BUILD IT WITH CLAUDE:
What separates this from a static bot: Claude reads its own trade journal every night and rewrites its own thresholds
1. Take an open-source Polymarket bot repo as your base logic. Feed it to Claude and have it migrate to CLOB v2: py_clob_client_v2, Safe wallet support, fee-aware evaluation
2. Hard-code the filters. Enter only when Δ ≥ 0.05 and p(j*,j*) ≥ 0.87. Apply Kelly on every fill.
3. Run DRY_RUN first. Log every signal, entry price, Markov state, and simulated P/L. No real money until the numbers hold for days
4. The nightly loop. Claude reads the journal, finds which persistence states actually won, adjusts MIN_PROB and MIN_EDGE, ships tomorrow's rules. The agent is sharper after 50 to 100 trades
THE SETUP:
Claude Opus as the brain. An open-source repo as the starting logic. A Polygon wallet with $50 to $100. Telegram for the morning report
Start at $1 to $2 per trade while it learns. Scale only when the dry runs and the live fills line up
17,000 trades compound a thin edge into six figures. The model finds the edge. The nightly loop keeps it sharp
Bookmark before you point a bot at your first window
🚨 FOR POLYMARKET DEVS AND BOT OWNERS:
Your bot is sizing positions wrong and you have no idea.
No error message.
No obvious failure.
Just quietly worse fills and confused risk management.
This is one of the most overlooked mistakes in Polymarket bot building.
Here is exactly what is happening and why it matters:
Most people think about position sizing in USD.
I want to risk $50 on this trade.
My bot calculates the order in dollar terms.
Simple, right? Nope.
Polymarket does not work in USD.
It works in shares.
And the math between those two things is not as straightforward as it looks.
When you calculate in USD first and convert to shares second - rounding errors accumulate.
Small discrepancies between what your bot thinks it ordered and what actually hit the book.
At low prices like 3 cents or 4 cents those rounding errors become significant as a percentage of your position.
A bot ordering at 3 cents thinking it placed a $30 position might actually have placed $28.47 worth.
That gap matters for two reasons.
First - your actual risk exposure differs from what your risk management system thinks it is.
Your stop losses and position limits are calculating against wrong numbers.
Second - across thousands of trades daily those small discrepancies compound into real PnL drag that never shows up as a single obvious loss.
It just slowly makes everything slightly worse than it should be.
The fix is to flip the calculation order completely.
My bot had negative PnL before I fixed those issues.
Now i'm sitting at $100,000 PnL.
Public wallet: <https://t.co/9ouws5ZyU1>
Decide on shares first.
Then derive the USD cost from the share count and current price.
Never go USD to shares.
Always go shares to USD.
This keeps your order quantities precise and your risk management system working against accurate numbers.
It sounds like a minor implementation detail.
Across 5,000 trades per day it is the difference between clean execution and a bot that always underperforms its own backtest without any obvious reason why.
Hope this will help you.
I also recommend you to go through the whole article where I shared the most common mistakes and my public 6 figs results.
Leaving it quoted below.
He built a trading bot and made $1,740,000 on NBA on Polymarket
His bot looks for small pricing errors in sports lines on spreads/totals in the 48-52c range and quickly buys the outcomes with edge using limit orders
His strategy:
> Recalculates fair probability when changes happen in the game
> Compares it with the price on Polymarket
> If there is edge, buys the favorable side
Link to his profile:
https://t.co/NPeCYmza5M
Using this strategy, he turned $200,000 into $1,740,000 in 2 months
https://t.co/608MkWpe2D
Paste any Polymarket wallet or profile and it gives you:
What the strategy is
How it trades
How it makes money
Risks in copying it Chain fingerprints, Analogs, Session behavior etc
Best of all, you can download a markdown file to feed your AI to help you replicate it.
I made this for myself and I've used for awhile. I've decoded every single wallet making money on Polymarket.
Figured Id share it. For free. All I ask is you follow me and repost. If it gets enough traction Ill release a lot more software I'm currently using.
#polymarket
🚨 BREAKING: AI can now build trading algorithms like Goldman Sachs' algorithmic trading desk (for free).
Here are 15 insane Claude prompts that replace $500K/year quant strats (Save for later)
arbitrage between @opinionlabsxyz and @Polymarket
prediction markets often disagree on probabilities for the same event
how it works in practice:
> find the same event on both platforms
> check YES price on one side and NO price on the other
> if YES + NO < 1.00 spread exists
there’s a tool designed specifically to help spot these kinds of discrepancies:
https://t.co/iey2FiitYI
how the tool actually works:
> it automatically matches identical events between Opinion and Polymarket
> parses live orderbooks (not just last traded price)
> lets you choose bid / ask / mid mode
> calculates whether YES on one side + NO on the other creates a spread
> checks liquidity depth so the setup is executable
> lets you set your budget and calculates exact share sizing
instead of manually calculating anything, the tool shows:
> how many shares to buy on each platform
> how much capital goes to each leg
> payout if YES wins
> payout if NO wins
> net locked spread
NFA, just an explanation of how the mechanism works