@boxmining@claudeai Interesting idea? a permanent benchmark for LLMs that transparently shows whether, and to what extent, compute power, stability, and reliability actually affect a modelβs advertised capabilities in real time. Maybe it's time for some refunds xD
Even though #chatgpt5 seems like the worst performing trading #AI in the new benchmark model @the_nof1 it sure performs as the best #couterindicator. So maybe a setup in terms of a counter mirroring tradingbot is the actual best move here. hmm!! xD
$THT isnβt chasing AGI hype, it holds core patents on data with embedded logic + blockchain coordination. This tech could underpin future agent-based systems.
In a decentralized AI world, $THTβs IP is silent infrastructure. The smartest data wins. @Thought_THT#agi#asi#agents
My personal view after some research: $THT isn't building AGI like OpenAI or Google. But they might hold a few clever patent 'puzzle pieces' for future AGI infrastructure. No GPUs, no models but IP with bite. Think: protocol layer, not product layer.
π $THT vs @ii_posts ? @Thought_THT owns 2 key US patents protecting tech where data itself carries intelligence & runs on π. The $fc whitepaper shows agents & proofs that closely overlap with this concept (70-80%). If enforced, $THT IP could force #foundationcoin to license.
@ii_posts@EMostaque Thoughtβs patents protect data with built in intelligence and blockchain based control. If @ii_posts and @EMostaque applies similar methods, @Thought_THT could enforce its IP, forcing licensing or redesign.
That would be some news for $THT.
$THT holds strong patent protection (US9454398B2 & US10462108B1) around its Smart Data tech. These patents could challenge projects like @ii_posts (II), with an estimated 70-80% chance of enforceability. Implications for $THT are significant, keeping a close π on. @EMostaque