David Sorensen

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@Jazz_Cougars @tjmcaulay What's with the unnecessary aggression? Tucking the ball and turning upfield is not included as an example in the NCAA rulebook, only the NFL. I'd think "act common to the game" would match between them, but I don't have any evidence of that.

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@tjmcaulay I appreciate the responses, Terry! I think the difference on the website means the "and" isn't actually critical--but I can understand why an official doesn't think so and holds fast to the rulebook.

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@tjmcaulay That may be the language in the rulebook. But it's not the language here that they are using to teach fans:

https://t.co/GJoYU5H17w

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@tjmcaulay What about in the NFL? Language from an NFL website:

"performs any act common to the game (e.g., tuck the ball away"

I suppose the act common to the game can be different between the NFL and NCAA, but I thought NCAA just adopted it from the NFL

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@animerobin01 @dilanesper More you aren't allowed to disingenuously run for office under a party you were never affiliated with before (and have since disaffiliated from again) with an application that includes the middle initial of the incumbent rather than your own and imagery imitating the incumbent's.

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@CoachACooley @zeeeegoat @RueNasty His right foot was planted during the gather step and doesn't move from that picture to the step 1 picture.

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@MAdamsStatGuy Letting the moment breathe without talking all over it is good. They are cutting to commercial, so he doesn't have more to add now, but he'll break it down after the commercial

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@CitchMonor Errors made by Mitch:
Thinking Terry was analyzing the play not adding commentary about the NFL
Claiming the rule Terry was talking about was surviving the ground
Stating that the NFL rule was wrong (the discussion Terry started is about the NFL)

Errors by Terry:

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@74X14L @CathyGabisJ @_Jiminfernal The spacing between letters

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@deseretnoise "It's like a balloon with esses"

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@gkthurston How does it compare to the old Colley-Thurston Matrix?

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@heat_fan1 @dilanesper @ajwagner86 We don't know, because they haven't released their opinion yet

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@derektmuller As you say, we don't have their opinion yet--but it wouldn't surprise me to learn the SCAK agreed that there are good reasons, but that these are nevertheless legally insufficient (i.e. not within the statutory or regulatory power)

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@gon42281 @dilanesper Because the timeline to get
a case to SCOTUS is too long to risk a bunch of them ending up affirmed by an equally divided court

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@SSN_Army Looking at the play-by-play, FAU was pretty consistently moving the ball on offense, then made mistakes at the end of drives. Plus, Army had some explosive plays, which don't get a lot of weight (relative to the yards gained) in success rate.

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@SSN_Army Success rate measures how consistently you are getting the yards you need to stay on schedule for a 1st down. Net success rate subtracts how often your opponent is doing that from how often you are doing that.

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@LukeAtomic @shirky17 @Bam_Bam_95 Yes, which is why it's a great lesson. If you're moving forward, pitching the ball sideways will always result in a forward lateral.

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@darinsmith1974 @jessetripathi @ASFleischman No. If it's truly baseless, it may very well be legally insufficient. If not, the judge refers the recusal motion to another judge who takes one look at it and says "No need to recuse here!" Case stays with the original judge the whole time.

[David Sorensen @Neuro_DOS]

@jessetripathi @ASFleischman Because now you're doing fact finding about yourself, which is inherently biased