Nexean

[Peter Baum @baum_p]

FACTS
To be fair, the intellectually retarded Irish didn’t know about Egypt bordering Gaza …..

[Anna 🎗️🇮🇱✡️🦁 @AnnaOdessa13]

Das ist Batya Holin, eine israelische Agrarwissenschaftlerin, die in einem Kibbuz nahe dem Gazastreifen lebt.

Sie liebt die Fotografie. Sie nahm Kontakt zu einem jungen Fotografen im Gazastreifen auf, der scheinbar ihre Leidenschaft für Frieden, Koexistenz und Fotografie teilte.

Er schickte ihr Bilder aus dem Leben in Gaza, während sie ihm Aufnahmen vom Alltag auf der israelischen Seite des Grenzzauns sandte.

Er sprach von seiner Liebe zum Frieden und zum Zusammenleben und schrieb ihr:

„Ich hoffe, dass dieses Projekt das gegenseitige Verständnis, die Lebensqualität und die Sicherheit auf beiden Seiten des Grenzzauns verbessern wird.“

Ihre gemeinsamen Fotografien wurden in Israel und weltweit veröffentlicht und galten als Symbol für Frieden, Hoffnung und friedliches Zusammenleben. Sie standen beinahe täglich miteinander in Kontakt.

Am 7. Oktober hörte Batya, wie Hamas-Terroristen in ihren Kibbuz eindrangen. Sie versteckte sich in ihrem Schutzraum. Plötzlich erhielt sie einen Anruf von ihrem Freund aus Gaza.

Er wollte wissen, wo sie sich befand und ob die israelische Armee bereits vor Ort sei.

In diesem Moment begriff sie, dass der Mann, mit dem sie jahrelang gesprochen hatte und der ihr von Frieden und Koexistenz erzählt hatte, offenbar mit der Hamas zusammenarbeitete, um sie und ihre Familie ermorden zu lassen.

Batya legte sofort auf.

Später sah sie Fotos des angeblich friedliebenden Fotografen aus Gaza, der verletzt worden war, nachdem er sich am Massaker vom 7. Oktober beteiligt hatte.

Mahmoud wurde später als einer der rund 300 Männer aus Gaza identifiziert, die in den Kibbuz Kfar Aza eindrangen und sich am schlimmsten Massaker an Juden seit dem Holocaust beteiligten.
———
Credit @GadSaad @RabbiPoupko
———
🔖 ⬇️ Und jetzt stellt euch vor, ihr erlebt eines Tages genau das.

Was, wenn der Freund, der heute öffentlich die Kinder in Gaza beklagt, Israel für alles verantwortlich macht und euch moralisch belehrt, morgen wissen will, wo ihr seid? Nicht, um euch zu helfen. Sondern um euch und eure Familie aufzuspüren und zu töten.

Wie würdet ihr euch fühlen, wenn ihr begreift, dass euer Vertrauen euch beinahe das Leben gekostet hätte?

[Nexean @Nexean1]

Ireland is going downhill all the way. Health of citizens don't matter.

[Robert Spencer @jihadwatchRS]

In Ireland, a Push to Boycott Israeli Pharmaceutical Company Teva
by Hugh Fitzgerald

Teva Pharmaceuticals is the Israeli company that is the largest producer of money-saving generics in the world. Now some people in Ireland want its products to be boycotted. If successful, and Teva is no longer a supplier, that will cost the people of Ireland close to $400 million a year.

Read more at the link in the next post.

[Imtiaz Mahmood @ImtiazMadmood]

When History Stops Being a Warning
The larger ramifications of the rapid advance of Democratic Socialism in the United States.

by Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

The blue wave that swept across America this week has left me deeply uncomfortable. Not because the Democrats won. That’s democracy. People go to the polls, cast their votes, and sometimes the result is one we don’t particularly like. I can live with that, even when I profoundly disagree with the political direction the voters have chosen.

What I find much harder to live with is the enthusiasm surrounding the victories, the almost gleeful celebration of political developments that remind me of things I have seen before. At least five members of the Democratic Socialists of America, an organization with a caucus that openly calls itself Marxist-Leninist, are on their way to Congress, and when she won her primary in June, one of them, Claire Valdez of New York, said: “We have declared that this movement is durable.” I believe her. And I cannot help wondering whether those celebrating have any idea why people like me find this so troubling.

I spent four formative years in America during the Reagan era, when communism was not some distant historical curiosity. We learned about it in school. We watched the news from Moscow and Eastern Europe. We knew about the Berlin Wall, about people risking their lives to escape communist countries, and about the fundamental difference between a society in which the individual was free and one in which the state determined the limits of that freedom.

In November 1988, I stood in East Berlin. I had crossed from West Berlin into a world that could hardly have been more different, and what I saw confirmed everything I had learned. I still vividly remember bustling West Berlin, the Kurfürstendamm with its sparkling lights in the dark November nights, and then, on the other side of Checkpoint Charlie, the drabness, the grayness and the palpable despair of a destroyed society. I decided then and there that I did not want to live in a society governed by socialism. Not now, not ever. I have never forgotten that experience.

Nor have I forgotten Iran.

I was there during the Iranian Revolution of 1979, as a child of seven. I watched a country undergo an ideological transformation, and only years later did I learn how it had come about, with leftists and Khomeini’s followers united in their opposition to the Shah. Their common enemy brought them together, but it did not mean they shared the same vision for Iran’s future. By 1983 the Communist Tudeh party was banned and its leaders were in prison, and in 1988 — the same year I stood in East Berlin — thousands of political prisoners were executed, leftists among them.

These experiences shaped my political convictions long before I had ever heard of Friedrich A. Hayek, Ludwig von Mises, or Murray Rothbard. When I eventually encountered their writings, I found an understanding of individual liberty that made perfect sense to me. Hayek, in particular, understood liberty as freedom from arbitrary coercion, with government constrained by the rule of law rather than empowered to direct people’s lives according to some grand political vision. Having witnessed what happens when those constraints disappear and the individual becomes subordinate to an ideology, his arguments resonated with me immediately.

That is why I find the current enthusiasm so difficult to understand.

America has been home to generations of people who fled communism, religious persecution, and authoritarian governments. They came because America represented something different. It offered the possibility of living without the state or a religious authority dictating every aspect of their lives. And yet I now watch Americans celebrating political ideas and alliances without asking the questions whose answers history has already taught us.

I am not suggesting that every Democrat is a communist, or that every Democratic victory is a step toward totalitarianism. That would be far too simplistic. What concerns me is the growing acceptance of socialist ideas, the attraction of communism among some on the left, and the willingness to overlook fundamental ideological differences in pursuit of political power.

Perhaps what troubles me most is the apparent absence of historical memory. We seem increasingly willing to judge political movements by what they promise rather than by what comparable movements have done when given power.

And that brings me to the question I cannot shake.

What happens when people no longer recognize the warning signs? What happens when they celebrate political developments without considering where those developments might lead? And what happens when they finally recognize the danger, only to discover that reversing course has become extraordinarily difficult?

I am not angry that Americans voted differently from how I would have liked. What I feel is apprehension about what lies ahead, rooted in experiences I cannot simply set aside.

Having seen East Berlin and lived through the Iranian Revolution, I know how profoundly political systems can change and how easily freedoms once taken for granted can disappear.

For much of my life, America represented the place to which people could flee when freedom disappeared elsewhere.

But what happens if America itself ceases to be that place?

Where will people go then?

Kitty Werthmann, an Austrian emigrant, answered that question years ago, and I have been quoting her ever since: “After America, there is no place to go!”

[Visegrád 24 @visegrad24]

Brahim Aouissaoui, the Tunisian illegal migrant convicted of murdering three people in the 2020 Islamist terrorist attack at Notre-Dame Basilica in Nice, France, has appealed his life sentence.

On October 29, 2020, Aouissaoui entered the basilica armed with a knife and murdered three worshippers and church workers.

His victims were:

• Nadine Vincent, 60, who was nearly decapitated.

• Simone Barreto Silva, 44, a Franco-Brazilian mother who was stabbed 24 times and died after escaping the church.

• Vincent Loquès, 55, the church sacristan and father of two daughters, whose throat was slit.

Born in Tunisia in 1999, Aouissaoui entered Europe illegally by boat, arriving on the Italian island of Lampedusa on September 20, 2020.

Despite receiving an order to leave Italy, he traveled through the country and reached Nice on October 27, just two days before the massacre.

During his trial in Paris in February 2025, he admitted committing the murders but declared:

"I am not a terrorist, I am a Muslim."

He justified the killings as revenge for Muslims killed by the West, arguing that revenge was a right.

When questioned about decapitating a woman, he described beheading as a symbolic act intended to frighten people.

On February 26, 2025, a special criminal court in Paris sentenced him to life imprisonment with an irreducible minimum term, France's harshest criminal punishment.

Judges cited his extreme dangerousness, lack of remorse, and continued risk of committing further violence.

Six years after the massacre, his conviction is now being challenged on appeal.

[Connor Tomlinson @Con_Tomlinson]

A Pakistani boy once told the Muslim Women's Network that his community "shares" girls:

“My mate called me and said ‘Bro I have a surprise for you, come over to this house.’ When I got there 15 of them were sitting in the living room. My mate told me to go upstairs for my surprise.

"When I went into the bedroom, another friend was doing this girl. The lads went up one by one and took turns and while they were waiting they were calling their mates, cousins and uncles to come over and join in and showing off.

"Others turned up too including two older men who were taxi drivers, who went straight upstairs. One older man said I am going to call my son over so he can practice on her and later his 15-year-old son arrived in his uniform.

"Everyone took turns and it took 6 hours. I did get concerned and said, ‘the girl is going to get broke, who will marry her?” The girl is not paid but she gets looked after, she is given food and the boys make sure she gets home safely if it gets late.

"There are set days Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays but some of my friends don’t like doing stuff like that on a Friday because it is Juma (holy day) and they go mosque.”

Pimping a girl out to your cousins and children is the norm in Pakistani communities in Britain.

You do not understand these people. We cannot share a country with them. They all have to go.

[Imtiaz Mahmood @ImtiazMadmood]

I am aware of tolerance but not sure they are! From a group of people with a belief system who... Hate dogs, hate gays, hate Jews, hate Christians, hate people who drink alcohol, hate anyone who eats pork, hates your pub, hates music, in some cases hate each other, they hate you and hate me but we bow down to this nonsense? This is suicidal empathy!

[Imtiaz Mahmood @ImtiazMadmood]

A view of the bus destroyed by a bomb in the London bombings, July 7, 2005. Photo taken July 8, 2005. Four explosions killed 52 people and injured nearly 800 others, orchestrated by four British Muslims.

Three terrorists separately detonated three homemade bombs in quick succession aboard London Underground trains in Inner London. Later, a fourth terrorist detonated another bomb on a double-decker bus in Tavistock Square. The train bombings occurred on the Circle Line near Aldgate and at Edgware Road and on the Piccadilly Line near Russell Square.

Apart from the bombers, 52 people from 18 countries were killed and nearly 800 were injured in the attacks. It was the UK's deadliest terrorist incident since the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 near Lockerbie and the UK's first Islamist suicide attack.

The explosions were caused by improvised explosive devices made from concentrated hydrogen peroxide and pepper, packed into backpacks. The bombings were followed two weeks later by a series of attempted attacks that failed to cause injury or damage.

The 52 victims were of diverse backgrounds. All were UK residents, including exchange students. The majority lived in or near London. Their ages ranged from 20 to 60 years old, with an average age of 34.

Thirty-two victims were British born, while one victim each came from Afghanistan, France, Ghana, Grenada, India, Iran, Israel, Italy, Kenya, Mauritius, New Zealand, Nigeria, Romania, Sri Lanka and Turkey. Three victims were Polish nationals, while one victim was a Vietnamese-born Australian and one held dual American-Vietnamese citizenship.

Seven of the victims were killed in the tunnel between Liverpool Street and Aldgate stations, six in the tunnel between Paddington and Edgware Road stations, 26 in the tunnel between King's Cross and Russell Square stations and a further 13 on the bus at Tavistock Square.

The four suicide bombers were later identified as:

Shehzad Tanweer, aged 22. He lived in Beeston, Leeds, occasionally working in his parents' fish and chip shop on Lodge Lane. He detonated his bomb first, on the number 204 train. Eight people, including Tanweer, were killed by the explosion.

Mohammad Sidique Khan, aged 30. The ringleader of the four bombers, he also lived in Beeston, Leeds, with his wife and young child. He worked as a learning mentor at a primary school. Khan was the second to detonate a bomb, on the number 216 train, killing seven people, including himself.

Germaine Lindsay, aged 19. He lived in Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, with his pregnant wife Samantha and young son. His was the third bomb to be detonated, on the number 311 train. The blast killed 27 people, including him.

Hasib Hussain, aged 18. He lived in Leeds with his brother and sister-in-law. Hussain detonated his bomb last, on a bus. Fourteen people, including him, died in the explosion in Tavistock Square.

Tanweer, Khan and Hussain were British-born sons of Pakistani immigrants, and Lindsay was a convert born in Jamaica.

Charles Clarke, Home Secretary when the attacks occurred, described the bombers as "cleanskins", a term describing them as previously unknown to authorities. On the day of the attacks, all four had travelled to Luton, Bedfordshire, by car.

Lindsay arrived at Luton railway station just after 5:00 a.m., while the other three left Leeds around 4:00 a.m. and arrived at the train carpark at approximately 6.50 a.m.; all four entered the station at 7:15 a.m. and boarded a Thameslink train which left for London at 7:25 a.m. (the initial official account wrongly gave this departure time as 7:40 a.m.) They were filmed on CCTV arriving at King's Cross station just before 8:25 a.m. and were seen hugging soon afterwards before heading towards the Tube.

Two of the bombers made videotapes describing their reasons for becoming what they called "soldiers". In a videotape broadcast by Al Jazeera on 1 September 2005, Mohammad Sidique Khan described his motivation. The tape had been edited and mentioned al-Qaeda members Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, describing them as "today's heroes". Khan's tape said:

I and thousands like me are forsaking everything for what we believe. Our drive and motivation doesn't come from tangible commodities that this world has to offer. Our religion is Islam, obedience to the one true God and following the footsteps of the final prophet messenger. Your democratically-elected governments continuously perpetuate atrocities against my people all over the world. And your support of them makes you directly responsible, just as I am directly responsible for protecting and avenging my Muslim brothers and sisters. Until we feel security you will be our targets and until you stop the bombing, gassing, imprisonment and torture of my people, we will not stop this fight. We are at war and I am a soldier. Now you too will taste the reality of this situation.

The tape continued:

...I myself, I myself, I make dua (pray) to Allah ... to raise me amongst those whom I love like the prophets, the messengers, the martyrs and today's heroes like our beloved Sheikh Osama bin Laden, Dr Ayman al-Zawahri and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and all the other brothers and sisters that are fighting in the ... of this cause.

On 6 July 2006, a videotaped statement by Shehzad Tanweer was broadcast by Al-Jazeera. In the video, which may have been edited to include remarks by al-Zawahiri, Tanweer said:

Your government has openly supported the genocide of over 150,000 innocent Muslims in Falluja... You have offered financial and military support to the U.S. and Israel, in the massacre of our children in Palestine. You are directly responsible for the problems in Palestine, Afghanistan, and Iraq to this day. You have openly declared war on Islam, and are the forerunners in the crusade against the Muslims. ... What you have witnessed now is only the beginning of a string of attacks that will continue and become stronger until you pull your forces out of Afghanistan and Iraq. And until you stop your financial and military support to America and Israel.

Tanweer argued that the non-Muslims of Britain deserve such attacks because they voted for a government which "continues to oppress our mothers, children, brothers and sisters in Palestine, Afghanistan, Iraq and Chechnya".

[GAZAWOOD - The Pallywood Saga - Official @GAZAWOOD2]

A Gazan woman cries on camera over the tough situation, then—unaware the camera is still rolling—bursts into laughter and trades high-fives with her laughing family over fooling the world.

[Elise Vanessa @ev0123456789]

🇺🇸【特別コラム】「米国の左派大学による『洗脳』考察」

米国で最高峰とされる高等教育機関に足を踏み入れた若者たちが、わずか数年のうちに精神を苛まれ、異様な外見的変容を遂げ、最終的に街頭で暴力行為に走る――。
この怪奇現象は、もはや個人の精神疾患や「若者の気まぐれ」というレベルを超えています。

入学前は清廉でオーソドックスな美的センスを持っていた学生が、人文・社会科学系学部へ進んだ途端、鼻ピアス、過激なタトゥー、毒々しい髪色、劇的な体型の崩壊、そして大量の抗うつ薬（SSRI）常用へと変貌を遂げる。
この悲劇の裏には、学問の府を装った米高等教育の「構造的洗脳システム」が存在する。

米国の主要大学における教員層の政治的偏向は、各種調査データでも「民主党・左派支持」が、圧倒的多数を占めるという形で客観的に証明されています。
本来、客観的知性と多様な視点を養うべき大学キャンパスは、いまや「Woke思想」と「過激な左傾イデオロギーの培養土」と化しています。

「性自認に基づく代名詞（Preferred Pronouns / Gender Pronouns）」「生物学的性別」という科学的ファクトの否定、「社会主義政策の肯定」による資本主義体制の極端な曲解、そして「交差性（インターセクショナリティ）」に基づく被害者意識の植え付け――。

高等教育という権威のもとで教え込まれるのは、現実世界を正しく認識するための知恵ではなく、西側文明と自国の伝統に対する「憎悪」です。

このイデオロギーの「洗脳」は、学生たちの精神と身体をダイレクトに蝕んでいく。
「従来の美意識は、男性優位社会の抑圧構造だ」と教え込まれた女性たちは、自らの身体をあえて傷つけ、歪めることで「正しさ」を証明しようとする。
「ボディ・ポジティブ（肥満も健康美）」という免罪符のもとで自己管理を放棄させられ、精神的混乱は、抗精神病薬や抗うつ薬の常用によって麻痺させられる。
既存社会への反発と破壊衝動は、やがて「道徳意識の欠落」を示すかのようにアダルトコンテンツ配信（OnlyFansなど）への過激な傾倒や、対立意見を持つ者への物理的な攻撃へと短絡していく。
健全な自我を解体された末の、悲惨な精神的崩壊の姿です。

中国共産党の苛烈な弾圧を逃れて渡米（亡命）した家族のもとに生まれ、自らも国連や米議会で人権を訴えていたテムルン・トゴチョグ氏の没落は、このシステムの恐ろしさを完璧に象徴しています。

本物の権威主義や言論統制から自らを守ってくれた「自由なアメリカ」を敵視し、大学の過激な左派イデオロギーに染まった結果、彼女は街頭で他者に暴行を加え、手錠をかけられて連行された。
本物の弾圧を知る親の世代の体験すらリセットし、若者の現実感覚と理性を完全に破壊する米国の教育病理です。

[盛雪SHENG Xue @ShengXue_ca]

我认识恩赫巴图先生很多年了🙏
也看过他女儿特穆伦在美国国会作证的视频，当时非常赞赏她的才华和勇气。

父母流亡美国，她在美国出生长大，从未有机会踏上故土。2024年12月5日，17岁的她站在美国国会-行政部门中国委员会面前，沉着而清楚地讲蒙古语如何在学校里被消失，文化符号如何被禁止，藏传佛教和萨满传统如何被镇压。她还曾在联合国大会期间向各国代表简报，2026年又作为焦点演讲者登上国际宗教自由峰会。她本该是把真相和正义传下去，反抗共产暴政的青年力量。

可11月1日在密歇根大学，她的激进极端情绪表露无遗，众目睽睽之下冲上去扇人耳光，把犹太裔女创作者推倒在地，被警察按倒带走时她还高喊：我当时就该杀了你！

⁉️到底出了什么问题⁉️

显然，这不是一次突然的情绪失控。这是一个曾经用自身被暴政迫害的苦难要唤醒美国的年轻人，被美国校园的极左意识形态彻底改造成一个要用拳头让别人闭嘴的人。

美国教育中的极左、极端与共产思潮，就是吞噬年轻一代的癌症。它不教人珍惜自由，不教人尊重不同意见，只教一套公式：用自己的位置和利益先判决谁是压迫者、谁是被压迫者；然后，正义与邪恶就由他们说了算。

更值得警惕的是，我这些年见过不少这样的反共斗士和菁英，到了民主国家，却转身拥抱极左意识形态。

为什么？他们把自己受迫害的真实经历，错套进了极左的公式。他们在新的国家里自觉是弱者、是少数，就认同了那套把普世人权偷换成身份特权的战术。

他们发现，把身份包装得越是受害者、弱者、少数群体，话语权越大；而且越是激进，越受左翼社会追捧。谁被贴上压迫者的标签，谁的权利就可以被剥夺。

人权一旦变成按身份分配的特权，暴力就会被包装成正义，极端主义就会被美化成进步主义。

特穆伦最可惜的地方就在这里。她曾经为信仰被镇压的人呼喊，如今却因为一张桌子上质疑伊斯兰的问题，就爆发，就动手打人，还说要杀人……；她的父辈逃离中共，是为了让孩子能在自由中成长；她却在美国的大学里，要用暴力让别人闭嘴。

逃出了一种洗脑，又走进另一种洗脑。逃出了极权的同化，又被极左同化。这才是这件事最痛、也最危险的地方。

希望这个案例能够让那些极力带动自己子女站左，认为在民主国家越左越进步，越吃得开的人能够思考🧐……

[Imtiaz Mahmood @ImtiazMadmood]

American Journalist SHATTERS the Biggest Myth About Islam

Islam is not merely a personal faith, but a comprehensive political and legal system that explicitly rejects core principles of Western liberal democracy.

While Western audiences are repeatedly told “Islam is a religion of peace,” classical Islamic law includes punishments for apostasy, blasphemy, homosexuality, and adultery—punishments that remain enforced in multiple Muslim-majority countries today.

These are not extremist distortions. They are mainstream interpretations upheld by state-backed religious authorities in places like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan, and Qatar.

The media’s refusal to acknowledge this reality has allowed a false narrative to flourish—one that equates any examination of Islamic doctrine with racism, despite Islam being an ideology followed by people of many races.

The term Islamophobia has become a rhetorical weapon, not a descriptor. Its purpose is to shut down debate about Islamic ideas.

No other belief system enjoys this level of insulation. Christianity, capitalism, socialism, feminism, and even atheism are all subject to harsh criticism in mainstream media. Islam, however, is treated as uniquely fragile—so fragile that facts themselves are labeled “hate.”

This double standard has serious consequences. When journalists self-censor, the public is deprived of informed discussion. When politicians refuse to acknowledge doctrinal realities, policy failures follow—particularly on issues of integration, free speech, and women’s rights.

Women’s Rights: The Uncomfortable Reality

One of the most striking points raised was the status of women under traditional Islamic law. In many Islamic legal systems, a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man. Inheritance laws favor male relatives. A husband may divorce his wife unilaterally, while women face significant legal hurdles.

Again, these are not fringe interpretations. They are codified law in numerous countries and justified explicitly through religious texts.

Western activists often blame “culture” or “colonialism” for these practices, but Islamic jurisprudence itself is the source. Pretending otherwise does not help Muslim women—it silences them.

Criticism Is Not Hatred
Criticizing Islam is not the same as attacking Muslims.

[Nexean @Nexean1]

@camhigby @basedinmalibu Useful idiot

[Kosher @koshercockney]

WARNING ⚠️

Christians beheaded by Islamic extremists in Nigeria.

There is a genocide of Christians happening across Africa and the media IS FUCKING SILENT

[Nexean @Nexean1]

Spoken succinctly

[Exposing Islam @DeportImperium]

#Islam explained in 26 seconds.

#Muslims
#Jihad
#Palestinianism
#EuropeOnFire

[Hillel Fuld @HilzFuld]

I couldn’t make this up if I tried.

Only in a deeply confused world can two billion Muslims be portrayed as an oppressed minority while 16 million Jews are painted as the aggressors.

Only in a deeply confused world can a Jewish state smaller than New Jersey, surrounded by dozens of Muslim-majority countries, be labeled a colonial power.

Only in a deeply confused world can Jews be told they don’t belong in the countries where they live, only to be called colonizers in the land from which they originated.

Only in a deeply confused world can Jews be accused of controlling the world while simultaneously being told they have no right to control their own destiny.

Only in a deeply confused world can the Jewish people’s desire for national self-determination be condemned by people who champion that very right for everyone else.

Only in a deeply confused world can a growing population be labeled the victim of genocide.

Only in a deeply confused world can an army that warns civilians of impending attacks be accused of indiscriminate killing.

Only in a deeply confused world can a country that has facilitated the delivery of massive quantities of humanitarian aid be accused of deliberately starving the civilians receiving that aid.

Only in a deeply confused world can a Jewish state where all three major religions enjoy legal protections for freedom of worship, and where roughly two million Arabs hold citizenship, be branded an apartheid state.

Only in a deeply confused world can people who claim to champion liberal values openly support a religion that violently persecutes people for exercising those very freedoms.

Only in a deeply confused world can people who champion LGBTQ rights march in support of people who throw LGBTQ individuals off rooftops.

Only in a deeply confused world can people who claim to defend women’s rights excuse or dismiss sexual violence committed against Jewish women.

Only in a deeply confused world can the deliberate kidnapping of children and elderly civilians be described as resistance rather than terrorism.

Only in a deeply confused world can people demand a ceasefire while refusing to demand the disarmament of the terrorist organization that started the war.

Only in a deeply confused world can people deny atrocities that the perpetrators themselves filmed and broadcast for the world to witness.

Only in a deeply confused world can one of history’s most thoroughly documented genocides, the Holocaust, be denied while its survivors still walk among us.

Only in a deeply confused world can attacking a synagogue thousands of miles from Israel be justified as resistance against Israeli government policy.

Only in a deeply confused world can Jewish students be harassed, threatened, and intimidated on university campuses by people who claim to stand against hatred and discrimination.

Only in a deeply confused world can countries welcome millions of migrants, witness serious failures of integration and rising extremism at the hands of those migrants, and still refuse to acknowledge the problem for fear of appearing intolerant.

Only in a deeply confused world can millions chant about a river and a sea they couldn’t identify on a map.

Only in a deeply confused world can acknowledging the dominant role of Islamist extremism in global terrorism be dismissed as racism.

Only in a deeply confused world can millions chant slogans calling for the elimination of Israel while claiming to stand for peace and coexistence.

Only in a deeply confused world can people demand accountability from a democracy while making excuses for a terrorist organization openly committed to its destruction.

Only in a deeply confused world can people condemn Israel for defending its borders while celebrating those who openly call for its destruction.

Only in a deeply confused world can the suffering of civilians become a global obsession when Israel is involved while atrocities elsewhere receive a fraction of the attention.

Only in a deeply confused world can people demonize an entire nation while benefiting every day from technologies developed by its people.

Only in a deeply confused world can the world’s oldest hatred be repackaged as a modern social justice movement and celebrated as progress.

Only in a deeply confused world can tens of thousands of terrorist attacks be accompanied by the chant of Allahu Akbar while the world pretends there is no pattern and it’s all just random attacks.

Only in a deeply confused world can millions stand in solidarity with a state that never existed.

Only in a deeply confused world can millions of people believe Palestine exists without the ability to say when it was established, where its borders are, who the prime minister was, what the currency is, or any other identifying factor that literally every country in the world has.

Only in a deeply confused world can so many people believe that all the Palestinians want is a state when literally every single leader of theirs has said that what they want is dead Jews.

Only in a deeply confused world can people claim that Jews have no history in a land where archaeological evidence has proven beyond any shadow of a doubt that Jews lived thousands of years ago.

Only in a deeply confused world can the United Nations pass more resolutions condemning Israel than all other countries combined.

Only in a deeply confused world can nearly a million Jews expelled from Arab and Muslim countries after 1948 be largely forgotten, while Palestinian refugees remain permanently politicized.

Perhaps the world isn’t just confused.

Perhaps it has lost its moral compass.

Just because so many people have lost their minds doesn’t mean you have to fall into their trap.

You were given a brain. Use it.

[Mossadil Commentary @MOSSADil]

🚨 PALESTINIAN ISLAMIC SCHOLARS CALL FOR JIHAD TO CONQUER PARIS

From the MEMRI TV archives: Palestinian Islamic scholars preached that Muslim armies would crush Paris, dismantle its civilization, and establish an Islamic Caliphate.

They presented three choices for non-Muslims: convert to Islam, pay the “jizya” poll tax, or face death.

The speakers also claimes French citizens were converting to Islam every hour.

[Eyal Yakoby @EYakoby]

“They killed my mother for being too old to be a sex slave. They killed all my brothers for refusing to convert to Islam. I was raped and tortured every day for 6 months. That’s what life is like for non-Muslims in the Middle East.”

Where is UN Women?

[Vivid.🇮🇱 @VividProwess]

This is Gaza today.

Thousands of “innocent” Gazans are at the funeral of a Hamas terrorist, many of them armed and calling for revenge.

Those are the people that the world calls the victims.

[Mossad Customer Support @LionOfJudahX]

Victor Davis Hanson with the uncomfortable truth 🔥

“They ethnically cleansed almost a million Jews from Arab countries between 1948–1973.
No one talks about that.

But only the Palestinians still claim ‘refugee’ status 78 years later.

When Poland was recreated, 12 million Germans walked back to Germany. Two million died.
You don’t see Germans today waving keys to apartments in Danzig screaming ‘I’m a refugee.’

Cypriots lost 40% of their land to Turkey.
Jews from Damascus, Cairo, Baghdad, the Gulf — kicked out, property stolen.
None of them still play the eternal refugee card.

Israel left Gaza in 2005 with hundreds of millions in greenhouses and infrastructure.
What did they do? Looted it.
Took $40–50 billion in aid… and built rockets and 500 miles of tunnels instead of a real state.

We’re supposed to feel sorry for people who chose this path?”

History is not a buffet. You don’t get to pick only the victimhood that serves you. 🇮🇱