Carnegie's Tech program is hiring a program coordinator!
If you know an exceptional intern, recent grad, or young person interested in tech & foreign policy, please send them my way
Job posting: https://t.co/CZ3It6cMrA
@CEIPTechProgram@CarnegieCyber
🚨 Very pleased to say we are advertising for a research fellow to join the cyber team @RUSI_org. If you think you have the right profile to work with us on UK and international cyber policy issues, then please see more below👇
An honour to host the panel "cyber operations in war: lessons from Ukraine". Adapting at pace, integrating private sector are making a difference. But Russian threat is not diminished.
🚨 UK's Ukraine Cyber Programme (UCP) is set to receive up to £25 million in new money with a two-year expansion
🧵A few thoughts about the announcement and activities to date
(1/9)
https://t.co/l0dNsttkCh
It was such a pleasure to co-organize the @EuropeanCyber workshop on wartime cyber operations in Ukraine with such a fantastic group of experts in London, supported by @NCSC. A lot of great insights.
https://t.co/lyVwA94BIV
Russian cyber operations in Ukraine: I’ve spent months collating and analyzing data on…
» Their military effectiveness
» Reasons why they weren’t more impactful
» Lessons for other states
The result is a very long paper and this 🧵... https://t.co/GX3TdoYryW
“cyber forces built for perpetual struggle likely lack the surge capacity necessary during wartime” @gavinbwilde insights are critical to understanding why Russia’s cyber ops haven’t met Western expectations
3/3 Incentives, accountability, sovereignty, burden sharing all come to the fore.
But there is shared commitment to defending values, not just narrow interests.
RU could still achieve effects in cyberspace, but this war suggests collective defence is worth investing in.
1/3 Happy to publish this on international support to UKR cyber defence, based on interviews w/@dsszzi, @FCDOGovUK, @GBadanes, @charley_snyder_ & others.
Ops show potential of collective defence, but also challenges of more enduring/strategic mechanisms.
https://t.co/0Kv7clCoyi
2/3 Largest (ie US) tech & cybersecurity co’s are indispensable to defence at scale.
Integrating them to foreign & defence policy raises issues for all parties.
Key roles for govt are catalyse/sponsor/legitimise/coordinate.
In two days, tune in live or online for an exciting discussion with @Maxwsmeets, author of "No Shortcuts: Why States Struggle to Develop a Military Cyber-Force," challenging deep-rooted assumptions on cyber conflict. https://t.co/BT5PA7sBex
📆 2010: Exeter striker Adam Stansfield died of bowel cancer age 31 and the club retired the number 9 shirt.
📆 2022: Adam’s 19-year-old son Jay Stansfield joins Exeter on loan from Fulham and takes the number 9 shirt.
Great work by @JonKBateman – strategic vision and, importantly, practical measures to limit risks & protect interests while avoiding costly & needless tech wars
I’m elated that @CarnegieEndow has released my big US-China tech “decoupling” report, w/ a kind foreword by @ericschmidt. Grateful for feedback + support from so many.
In lieu of a dry summary, a 🧵 on why I wrote this tome + what I learned along the way: https://t.co/zo6KQqA67o
Join @CEIPTechProgram fellow @JonKBateman on Thurs (4/21) in a panel discussion hosted by @LloydsofLondon on cyber insurance & the reasoning behind their cyber war clauses: https://t.co/UgaH6aPl5H
For what purpose does the U.S. publicly attribute cyber operations? And how to explain this to a Chinese audience, whose gov’t calls every U.S. attribution false, baseless, hypocritical, and destabilizing?
Some reflections from Track 2 dialogue: 🧵https://t.co/REhPFSqboS
This project gave fascinating insight to the effect of Western public attributions against China. Clearer policy on when, why, how attributions occur would negate many Chinese complaints, i.e. ‘ill substantiated’ and ‘reckless’. https://t.co/PlLivNoYFY via @CarnegieEndow