What's wrong with me? I don't care whatsoever to have many followers.
It's about views and engagements based on the quality and appeal of one's content.
@elonmusk@Geiger_Capital 100 years ago only 3-5% of the Netherlands population was of foreign descent (up to 3rd generation). Now it's 35% nationwide, and in the cities it's well over 70%.
Analyse. Hoofdredactie @NUnl na 1,5 dag stilte: "We waren te voorzichtig na mesaanval Belfast, door de deze te negeren, wreven we verder in een lelijke vlek."
Die lelijke vlek is jullie eigen raciale fixatie.
https://t.co/qm162GG0op
"Als dit exacte voorval, waarbij een blanke dader een gekleurde immigrant op straat zou proberen te onthoofden, dan had het op jullie voorpagina gestaan zodra het nieuws bekend werd.
Die 'lelijke vlek waar jullie in wreven', is jullie eigen raciale fixatie."
Just in: Doctors Without Borders staff have been sexually abusing underage refugees in Chad — including trading aid for sex, and indications of organized sexual trafficking.
For those who've followed the group's ties to Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza, this is hardly a surprise
Hoe veilig zijn de NLse jongeren nog?
Vier jongeren pakte het petje van een onbekende jongen af, die wilde zijn petje terugpakken. Daarop besloten de 4 jongens hem midden op het station compleet tot moes te slaan en schoppen.
Geef ze door!
Jelle Postma "onderzoekt" extreemrechts. Alleen extreemrechts? Ja, alleen extreemrechts. Dus geen jihadisme? Nee, geen jihadisme. Ook geen extreemlinks? Nee, ook dat onderzoekt Postma niet. Dat is vreemd, want dit zijn de gegevens van Europol. Geslaagde terroristische aanslagen in EU-landen in 2024:
24 Jihadistisch gemotiveerde aanslagen
21 Extreemlinks gemotiveerde aanslagen
1 Extreemrechts gemotiveerde aanslag
Bron: Europol, European Union Terrorism Situation and Trend Report, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2025: https://t.co/j758qXAdyv
Wat zegt ons dit? Dit zegt ons dat Postma geen "onderzoeker" is maar een huurling. Hij is ingehuurd om radicaalrechtse partijen (partijen rechts van de VVD) te besmeuren. Postma is gewoon in dienst van het kartel. En hij zit bij kartelomroepen zijn praatjes te verkopen zonder dat hem ook maar een haar in de weg wordt gelegd door kritische vragen.
@JOBhakdi Yes, I agree, total chaos. It's a war on countless fronts, and the outcome is anyone's guess. Except, the bad actors, on any front, have the advantage. Very worrying imho.
She couldn't have known. There were no signs. Nothing out of the ordinary happened right in front of her. What husband wouldn't shell out £4k for a pair of his wife's old shoes? Happens every day.
https://t.co/3qt8vP4q8G
I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true:
— As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable.
— Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.)
— A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused.
— In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not “serious.”
— In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety.
— In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community.
— The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority.
— Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.