@11Notabot@TheWansteadtap No, it would be employment, and of course the government would take a slice in tax. The same as the mother paying a home help.
@thefordprefect@BjornLomborg In the old days of stone floors brick walls and no electricity , when your house flooded, you swept it out washed the floor and walls and carried on like nothing happened. With modern houses the damage to plasterboard, insulation, electrics, floors and furniture costs a fortune.
@acoolerclimate5@MatthewCappucci The wonderful thing about climate science. Every observation can be explained by it. Heat, cold, floods, drought, A theory that explains everything, explains nothing.
@agilepredict They took 60% of line because they had the capacity to take 60% off line and still provide the required energy. A side note, France is reducing the electricity prices by 15% this year.
@agilepredict Take a look at France to see how it should be done. Nuclear runs continuously at minimum daily demand. Daily peaks are supplied from hydro. Wind and solar seems to be sold to others when it’s available.
@BjornLomborg A hundred years ago, if your house flooded, you swept out the mud, washed the walls and your possessions, and everything was back to normal. With modern houses with insulated interiors full of electrical appliances, everything has to be ripped out and replaced.
@AndyWest_tweets@ChrisMartzWX If the world’s climate was so unstable that a 1.5 digree rise tips it into catastrophe, the world would have burnt up long ago.
@MikeHudema And all those helicopters flying backwards and forwards to service the stuff. When there is no wind it’s equivalent to 0 nuclear power stations.
@RealDonKeith Because when you friend gets scammed, he asks the bank to give him his 20k back. He will say they should have stopped him taking the money out. You can’t have it both ways.