Nikki Merson

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@mattvanswol @EndWokeness This clip is not about this case. That is why she does not mention anything about this case. This is the definition of taking something out of context.

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@EndWokeness This was not a commentary on this case. And everything she’s saying is true. It’s a disparity of force argument. If she were wrong, every single criminal defense lawyer in the country would be screaming and yelling about it. It wouldn’t be limited to you all smooth brains on X.

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@ValentinaForUSA Jesus broke bread with drunks, sinners & tax collectors. The Great Commission calls us to make believers of all nations. You can’t fulfill it if you only associate with believers. The gospel can only be spread in circles/regions where people don’t already know Jesus.

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@mannyfidel “It wasn’t a depiction. It’s me.” ~Donald Trump

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@AntiWokeMemes F. The man in the picture

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@BravoKiloActual @yellowwordle All of which has been held by federal courts&SCOTUS to be protected first amendment activity. Our country was founded on disrupting tax enforcement, boycotting state-sanctioned commerce, destroying govt property, forming unauthorized political bodies, & rejecting govt. authority

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@BravoKiloActual @ProseNKahn Obstruction requires physical force. He was shoved, grabbed, and raised his hand to shield his face. None of that is force. The only force was imparted by the “agents.”

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@harry_b90388 @dd_chip @BravoKiloActual The word GUN was spoken in this context: an agent confirmed “I HAVE THE GUN”. Kinda changes your analysis.

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@BravoKiloActual @_kak___ @StoneyTeej SCOTUS & federal courts have spoken. Cohen v. California (1971): Emotional, offensive expression is protected. Porter v. Martinez, (9th Cir. 2023): horn honking is protected. United States v. Doe, (D.C. Cir. 1992): nonverbal sounds (incl.whistles) are expressive conduct.

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@NRA @realDonaldTrump Tell your dementia-riddled leader that his refusal to allow states to regulate AI is the reason we don’t have regulations around AI. Oh, and also, the White House gets what they give.

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@Franklin_Graham They told her to keep moving. Then they told her to get out. Then they shot her. There is no “clear directive” nor “time to comply•

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@TomiLahren She left her only child. At school. Because it’s a school day. And she exercised her constitutional right to travel through her own neighborhood. To get back home.

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@MAGAVoice Kirby v. Duva, 530 F.3d 475 (6th Cir. 2008)
Officer stepped into the path of a slow-moving vehicle & fired.
Holding:
Deadly force was unreasonable where the officer could have moved out of the way.
An officer may not create a deadly threat by positioning himself in front of a car

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@LauraLoomer Kirby v. Duva, 530 F.3d 475 (6th Cir. 2008)
Officer stepped into the path of a slow-moving vehicle & fired.
Holding:
Deadly force was unreasonable where the officer could have moved out of the way.
An officer may not create a deadly threat by positioning himself in front of a car

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@EricLDaugh Completely baseless BS. This was her street. She lived here. She was coming home from school dropoff. There weren’t even protests at this hour of the day. Where is your proof?

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@KennethFCrowe1 @WHLeavitt @Chesschick01 She was a single mom in her way home from school dropoff. There were no protesters at that time of day. She was not a target nor an agitator. And it is legal to protest in the US.

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@StandUpForTrmp E

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@SUBRATA30016572 Kirby v. Duva, 530 F.3d 475 (6th Cir. 2008)
Officer stepped into the path of a slow-moving vehicle & fired.
Holding:
Deadly force was unreasonable where the officer could have moved out of the way.
An officer may not create a deadly threat by positioning himself in front of a car

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@SUBRATA30016572 Estate of Starks v. Enyart, 5 F.3d 230 (7th Cir. 1993)
Officer stepped in front of a moving car and shot the driver.
Court Holding:
If an officer places himself in danger, he cannot rely on that danger to justify deadly force.

[Nikki Merson @NikkiMerson]

@wholesome_X1 @JDVance The US keeps databases on political ideology of mass shooters whose political motivations are clear. 57% are right wing/conservative extremists. 25% are left wing extremists. The remainder are Muslim/non-American political ideologies. The right does this 2X as often as the left.